If someone subscribes to the "I can do better than nature" philosophy (keeping lights on 24 hours to maximize growth relative to time), I'd advise them to look into LED "flower initiators." Hitting plants with 720nm (far red, I forget if it's 720 or 730) puts them into the hormone-producing state faster, allowing you to run something like 14 hours on in flower. More light, more growth, or faster finish.24/0 for veg. some will argue 18/6 is better and that the plants need to rest. not true. MJ is one of the few plants that can photosynthesize 24/7.
not to nitpick, but 18/6 is not what happens in nature either. summer solstice in most parts of the US is at most 15hrs daylight.If someone subscribes to the "I can do better than nature" philosophy (keeping lights on 24 hours to maximize growth relative to time), I'd advise them to look into LED "flower initiators." Hitting plants with 720nm (far red, I forget if it's 720 or 730) puts them into the hormone-producing state faster, allowing you to run something like 14 hours on in flower. More light, more growth, or faster finish.
I'm happy with the results of 18/6 and 12/12. Haven't been tempted to use more electricity to see what I get. I tend to gravitate toward how to use less.
how come the full moon doesn't mess up outdoor? the sky is pretty bright at night out in the boontoolies even without a full moon.and when you do go to 12/12, it has to be absolutely dark. watch out for small LEDs on power strips, etc. it will mess up your flowering.
ahhh ... thnxIt is the difference in light hours that is important. Not the totality of darkness during flowering. In other words it is not fatal for there to be a bit of light leakage during flowering. Hope that helps shed light on the question...
Good luck, BigSteve.