Yesterday's Mass Shooting.

nuskool89

Well-Known Member
Oh look

A perfect example or right wing confirmation bias.

I know it means something to somebody who clings to the false idea that they are safer with a gun. Reality is that there are tens of thousands dead due to gun homicides each year and maybe a handful of times the good guy with a gun prevented anything. Not to mention that when the mass murderer is white and they kill scores of black people, cops buy him a meal at McDonalds.

That said, I'm glad for the lives saved. It reminds me of the time a right wing white terrorist was stopped after he "only killed on person and wounded three others" at a BLM protest rally in Portland this spring. It happens sometimes. The few times the bad guy is stopped is not really worth liberal gun laws.

Your response to this thwarted shooting could have used at least three more random right-wing-white-fear-porn ramblings really make your point.

Why this example of a “good guy with a gun” from just three days ago (posted in response to the msnbc actor’s linked video) elicits a right-wing-white-fear-porn response from you seems way out of left field (no pun intended) even for you.

It’s like youre in this constant state of rage about “prejudice and hate” while full on dishing out prejudice and hate in like four different flavors.


Many of your fellow riu members who align closely with your beliefs, and you regularly converse with, in fact own firearms. I was actually surprised to see some of the members collections as I’d formed assumptions based off their other posts.

Gun ownership, murderers, good people, bad people, and gun laws are not about right wing white people. All sorts of people for all different reasons own guns, use guns, and carry guns. A lot of bad sh*t happens. You’re not going to take away peoples guns, because all sorts of Americans of many different colors and beliefs would refuse to give them up at this point in history. I’m sure the woman who shot the active shooter at the graduation party in the article I linked, was super hung up on right wing talking points and had a NRA poster on her wall :roll:

The reality is it’s impossible to ensure 100% of illegal firearms would vanish, or 100% of the bad people who choose to harm people would cease to exist, if you waved your magic internet wand and banned firearms. Little Ms. Mary who is African American, grandpa Eduardo who is latino, business owner Pham who is Asian, and saleswoman Susan who is white…..would all tell you to get bent if you tried to explain away their right to defend themselves with your silly opinions that are not based in reality and offer no plausible solutions
 
Last edited:

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
i would be willing to give up a couple of my guns if it would help get the situation under control. i really only need one, if i actually NEED any...my shotgun would probably be the best choice to keep, they're very versatile, with different ammo and different chokes you can both feed and protect yourself, slugs to self protect and take down larger game, birdshot for smaller game....
That’s why I bought a shotgun as my first purchase and it was probably 15 years before I bought a rifle (had a 22 given to me by grandfather and still have it). I am a bit of a collector though but all are older classics like a model 12 3” mag and 1894 25-20 lever action for example. I think I have around 27 now lol. Hopefully when the kids sell them they’ll have a bit of money for things they like to do ;).
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
That’s why I bought a shotgun as my first purchase and it was probably 15 years before I bought a rifle (had a 22 given to me by grandfather and still have it). I am a bit of a collector though but all are older classics like a model 12 3” mag and 1894 25-20 lever action for example. I think I have around 27 now lol. Hopefully when the kids sell them they’ll have a bit of money for things they like to do ;).
We will have sensible gun laws in Canada, in America, one day they will be having robocop knocking on their door...
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Your response to this thwarted shooting could have used at least three more random right-wing-white-fear-porn ramblings really make your point.

Why this example of a “good guy with a gun” from just three days ago (posted in response to the msnbc actor’s linked video) elicits a right-wing-white-fear-porn response from you seems way out of left field (no pun intended) even for you.

It’s like youre in this constant state of rage about “prejudice and hate” while full on dishing out prejudice and hate in like four different flavors.


Many of your fellow riu members who align closely with your beliefs, and you regularly converse with, in fact own firearms. I was actually surprised to see some of the members collections as I’d formed assumptions based off their other posts.

Gun ownership, murderers, good people, bad people, and gun laws are not about right wing white people. All sorts of people for all different reasons own guns, use guns, and carry guns. A lot of bad sh*t happens. You’re not going to take away peoples guns, because all sorts of Americans of many different colors and beliefs would refuse to give them up at this point in history. I’m sure the woman who shot the active shooter at the graduation party in the article I linked, was super hung up on right wing talking points and had a NRA poster on her wall :roll:

The reality is it’s impossible to ensure 100% of illegal firearms would vanish, or 100% of the bad people who choose to harm people would cease to exist, if you waved your magic internet wand and banned firearms. Little Ms. Mary who is African American, grandpa Eduardo who is latino, business owner Pham who is Asian, and saleswoman Susan who is white…..would all tell you to get bent if you tried to explain away their right to defend themselves with your silly opinions that arnt based in reality and offer no plausible solutions
I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Texas Republicans EXPOSED after Failed Uvalde Cover Up Attempt
61,264 views May 28, 2022 Texas Republicans like Greg Abbott, Ted Cruz and Ken Paxton are doing everything to deflect and hide the truth about the events in Uvalde.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

'Falling flat': Acosta breaks down GOP lawmaker's pro-gun talking points
52,679 views May 28, 2022 CNN's Jim Acosta breaks down the pro-gun talking points from some GOP members and examines the potential reasons the US leads in number of mass shootings compared to other countries.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
It's not a problem in the states that kids don't hunt, they are hunted on the streets and in the schools, so it keeps em on their toes! Make it a part of PE class and hold completions of them kids dodging paint balls, it could replace football and would be a useful survival skill. Ya gotta adapt to circumstances ya can't change I say...
Kids are hunted in the states.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
What are the licensing arrangements?
Free range I'm afraid, no permits or licenses required, just a gun and they are easy to get.

I wanna see the 2nd challenged about grenades and rockets too, it says arms, not guns, I would have though a logical literalist like you would see that and run with it! They had all three back when the second was written and it was written for military purposes, so arms means grenades and rockets too. :lol:

The big federal guberment has no right to regulate guns in DC, DC ain't no state and the 2nd is for the states only! Washington DC should be open carry! The federal guberment has no business regulating guns, it's unconstitutional and regulations on machine guns and howitzers should be struck down. If some good citizen in DC wants to own a howitzer, it is his God given right to do so and to shoot it from his backyard too! Freedumb! :lol:
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Free range I'm afraid, no permits or licenses required, just a gun and they are easy to get.

I wanna see the 2nd challenged about grenades and rockets too, it says arms, not guns, I would have though a logical literalist like you would see that and run with it! They had all three back when the second was written and it was written for military purposes, so arms means grenades and rockets too. :lol:

The big federal guberment has no right to regulate guns in DC, DC ain't no state and the 2nd is for the states only! Washington DC should be open carry! The federal guberment has no business regulating guns, it's unconstitutional and regulations on machine guns and howitzers should be struck down. If some good citizen in DC wants to own a howitzer, it is his God given right to do so and to shoot it from his backyard too! Freedumb! :lol:
I do not believe that the 2nd addresses destructive devices you describe. I believe the focus is on firearms of the century.
 

natureboygrower

Well-Known Member
Maybe my posts make you think and that makes you mad?
Quit flattering yourself. Goddamn you think a lot yourself dont you? How fucking enlightened. Quite clear with the rambling, masturbatory, violent scenarios you like to post, you're doing it for your own pleasure.
You must have been taught by Bhajan. Fraud
 
Top