You Have The "Religious Liberty" To Suck Baby Dicks

londonfog

Well-Known Member
the parents choose their rabbi, ir's not like orthodox rabbis are running wild doing this to random kids.

it's not fellatio either, so let's not use dishonest terminology like righties do.

the only difference, which you correctly identified, is the safety aspect. which is my only objection as well.
Ok UB I have to admit that I'm clueless as to how and why it is done, but if some man is actually putting his mouth on a babies penis and call it a religious practice, then I'm done with that religion.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
the parents choose their rabbi, ir's not like orthodox rabbis are running wild doing this to random kids.

it's not fellatio either, so let's not use dishonest terminology like righties do.

the only difference, which you correctly identified, is the safety aspect. which is my only objection as well.
I disagree, this is only performed by rabbis who perform this, there are only so many to choose from. Most Jewish people do not practice this antiquated form of Babylonian Talmud.

I disagree. Even a hasty scan of the Talmud reveals some quite disturbing sexual practice not seen even in most other religious texts. Taken in this context, I would not be in the slightest doubt that it is stimulating for the "spiritual leader". The object of the mouth to penis contact is not simply to clean the baby's penis, but to extend the foreskin. This is achieved through physical arousal which by definition is fellatio, even if the cocksucker claims it's innocent.

We do agree on the final point however.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ok UB I have to admit that I'm clueless as to how and why it is done, but if some man is actually putting his mouth on a babies penis and call it a religious practice, then I'm done with that religion.
it's an ancient method. it draws blood away from the cut when doing a circumcision. and jews are kinda known for carrying on traditions. hence why we still sit down once a year and do a seder, or fast for 24 hours once a year.

most jews gave up this tradition for good reason, but uptra orthodox is ultra orthodox. they keep traditions going even to the extreme, hence the goofy looking sideburns and all.
 

unwine99

Well-Known Member
The Aztecs used to rip the still-beating hearts out of still-conscious sacrificial humans. Fortunately, times change, and so do silly and meaningless traditions.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Hahahaha I love the word cunt.
I actually wasn't being a cunt in my eyes my cunt is what I fuck with literally. I was being chill about It. I was totally amused.
You amuse me! If I showed my bitch skills I'd start talking about how you must have gotten yours sucked if you feel so strongly about it, and are taking such offense to reference bathing children etc... Uncle Buck sounds like a baby fucker name BTW. Peace and Love honey!! Enjoy your night ❤❤ I won't give another response to your stupid ass no matter what shit you type. Anyone that argues baby dick sucking is a wacko!!!! Religious or not. Buh Byebongsmilie
Goddamn, what a mistake you've made..

Please let the bolded be true
 

god1

Well-Known Member
Hahahaha I love the word cunt.
I actually wasn't being a cunt in my eyes my cunt is what I fuck with literally. I was being chill about It. I was totally amused.
You amuse me! If I showed my bitch skills I'd start talking about how you must have gotten yours sucked if you feel so strongly about it, and are taking such offense to reference bathing children etc... Uncle Buck sounds like a baby fucker name BTW. Peace and Love honey!! Enjoy your night ❤❤ I won't give another response to your stupid ass no matter what shit you type. Anyone that argues baby dick sucking is a wacko!!!! Religious or not. Buh Byebongsmilie

Yeah, you're right, he is a "whack-o". He's the center of the "whack-o" unvierse for a bunch of these guys.

He's also "vulgar", a "racist", a "liar" and not very bright.

He projects his short comings on to anybody that disagrees with him.

Just the facts.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Yeah, you're right, he is a "whack-o". He's the center of the "whack-o" unvierse for a bunch of these guys.

He's also "vulgar", a "racist", a "liar" and not very bright.

He projects his short comings on to anybody that disagrees with him.

Just the facts.
Hmm, I just had a disagreement with him in this very thread and no such projection occurred. He hates racist shitstains though, so maybe that has something to do with the meltdown you had after your exchange with him.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Hmm, I just had a disagreement with him in this very thread and no such projection occurred. He hates racist shitstains though, so maybe that has something to do with the meltdown you had after your exchange with him.
Same here, so weird, right..?
i was gonna say, we were all being pretty civil in our disagreement, trying to define the terms of our debate, so on and so forth.

i don't recall labeling you guys as anything though. so odd.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
The fact yous are even discussing this rather than condemning it is a sign your nation needs to purified in nuclear fire.

Just saying...
 
Top