Your thoughts on Ram Dass and WHY LSD is illegal

Rodart Cockburn

New Member
And you said it earlier that there really isn't a connection between "everything is illusory" and "lets kill others". I mean if everything was illusory then others wouldn't exist making that act of killing them ultimately a fallacy.

This person is not a good example to use.

Peace
 

Puffer Fish

Well-Known Member
I love your brains .... and the thought process generated in this conversation.

This thread is about
Ram Dass (divergence of science/religion)
And LSD.

The question at hand ... why is is illegal ?

Lets 'home' on what we can calculate and observe ...
as also evaluate our personal experiences ...
in synthesis of a theory ?

Why is LSD illegal !
 

EyeZ

Member
This is a very interesting thread; however, from my personal viewpoint, I feel that such things like LSD allow people to transcend past language. We don't need other people to learn the truth of the world, this could in theory be deciphered without any help. However, two heads are better than one right? See, the thing with language, and communication in general, is not that a word is meant to mean something. Words are meant to represent a feeling, thought, object, etc.

While I may say the word 'table', if you were raised for the word 'table' to mean 'chair', you would believe me to be talking about the chair, not the table. There is no real way to prove this communication failure ever occurred in most situations. What LSD does, is rather and having to communicate with intellect, and words, it allows people to make abstract connections to things words cannot represent.

A word can never truly represent an emotion. I might say, "I hate this", but hate is something made up from personal experience. For one, hate could mean a desire to kill. For another, a desire to run, and for yet another, a desire to understand. And for the most part, it is intensely more complex than that -- past experiences, combined with current judgment, result in a positive or negative attitude toward something. When you say, " I love you ", that could be a sexual desire, or even just familiarity. However... thoughts exist without language. LSD is the manipulation of the mind and thoughts, and therefor allowing one to make a logical (or, I suppose, illogical) connection to something words could never express. Now, if I were to attempt to describe my trip to you, there is a very, very very slim chance of you understanding what I'm speaking. The reason? Words cannot convey emotion. Every thought we have, is centered on emotion.

I could make a new word, based on existing words that convey existing emotions or thoughts, but already this is skewed as our emotions are not properly conveyed by words, and therefor you would STILL understand my word as only what you interpret it to be. By nature, communication is flawed. Yet, a person can recognize emotion without speech. We can recognize animal emotions, can we not?

LSD, on the other hand, allows us to connect WHY we feel these emotions, in a matter of seconds. To go through, and explain this in english, well that would be days, weeks, months, if we could even manage to remember every small event that added up to something.

I feel like I'm rambling, and I gotta go eat, so I'm gonna stop here, but just some food for thought... (Pun intended, haha)


Note : By my own theory, I realize by writing this I kinda make my whole idea fall apart, but realize I am talking extremes. Obviously, some communication is possible, or we wouldn't be where we are today. But what I mean to point out, is while we are communicating, how do we communicate understanding of what is trying to be communicated? It is logically impossible, as to communicate understanding is to be communicating more, and again, how would we know we are understanding this second level of communication?
 

Rodart Cockburn

New Member
I would have to guess it is because of the people who use it, or what the people who use it tend to believe/realize while they are on it. In fact heres a quote from someone:

"Its sort of a paradox, to end the drug war we need to accept a new way for understanding, using drugs will tend to precipitate the exact experience we need to understand." -Don't know who.

Then why its illegal is either because of what it turns people into, or what people use it. Obviously making people bad-shit nuts is specious because there isn't a real concern of thats; and absolutely functioning and benign people do use it(and increasingly so I tend to notice) and remain functioning and benign afterward.

It could be the common emotionality people will sense which could be the end of power for the elite. Or it could just be as was said by eyez, it help connect abstract ideas creating a form of intelligence that could be the end to power for the elite.

This is proven by the fact that people being scared like an elusive boogey man that it is, and its still illegal. Its a power structure that would crumble because of individual thought.

Peace
 

Tenner

Well-Known Member
Sorry I must be missing what your trying to say. Are you saying science is not reason? Reason is only possible through discussion between parties, language is absolutely necessary to make a reasonable assessment of the world. Its a way for more than a individual to compile common information that they haven't directly observed and weed out disinformation or naivety.

Just because our word language doesn't have ideal structure to convey truths, doesn't mean universal truths don't exist. Unless I missed a memo? Like pi for example, that is a universal truth. From what we can sense gravity is also universal. The reason truth must be decided on is so the content of a language is consistent. Rather than having eight words that mean snow, we can define it as the material H2O being subject to a lowered temperature while rendering its H-bonding nearly ineffective and its energetic movement to a dull humm.

What science tries to do is make as few assumptions as possible, and only make an assumption if that assumption can lead to prove another idea while adhering to the 'known' truths. Thats not to say what we know as truths haven't evolved into what we know and aren't going to evolve further. My point was that math is a much more concise and accurate way of knowing the world.

It just seems your entire ideal hinges on relativism, sort of a thought up metaphysical world(please correct me if I'm incorrect). I prefer a world that each can test themselves, the objective and falsifiable, and the only proof hinges on ones desire to dissect what 'is'.

That book sort of sounds like plato's allegory of the cave, and science is in complete consonance with that. And commonsense would say that what people believe is inevitably a result of its experiences(its experiences could include scientific meandering).

I really don't know if I got that right.

Peace
Yes, I`m saying science isn`t reason. Scientific and philosophical, even logical thinking leads to a chaotic sequence of questioning reality. Science works by questioning things and getting the answer. You are however, thinking of science to be something which will answer our reason of existence, this is not possible. Why is it not possible? I explained earlier. Scienc and logic will keep asking, why? And for every question there has to be an answer and reason. What will happen in the end, infinite questioning and infinite answers? It just CANT give us a logical answer.... I mean oh yea, religgeon can do that by telling people asking questions that god made them and to stop questioning his existence and have faith, therefore allowing them to be ignorant. Don`t be confused by what logic and science actually give us, they will never give us reason, they will give us benefits. The ability to manipulate everything around us to our own benefit and compare things around us.

If you think of some electronical part, e.g logical comparator in electronics which compares 2 signals to tell which of them is bigger. Thats the function of that electronic part part, the function of our brains are to keep us alive and reproducing... Do you think evolution gives a damn about finding an answer even if it is possible? So just like the Comparator, (its called an OPAMP actually) we can compare things and weight up odds, we can say a rock just hurt our leg and we could hurt someone else with it, realise that fire works.

Don`t let our advancement in science, we are still comparing and making analogys and this will never change. Even if you know there is an electron or somethings gaining or losing electrons in chemistry this isn`t universal at all. Its your notation of an phenomenon in our universe and everyone will look at that phenomenon with a different perspective. What you are doing, is making note of this phenomenon and its properties and how to use it, you cannot move beyond that. Thats what our brains are ment to do, as a specie what will knowing why we exist really do for us anyway, would it make a difference if you knew or not?

Like pi for example, that is a universal truth : Pi is in our own notation, I don`t have to remind you numbers don`t actually exist they are our notation of a phenomenon. If you drew a picture of a tree would that be universal for all the entities on planet earth? What about something with a different perspective, like a bat for example. It will see with sound and therefore disagree with you.

Look at it this way, we are in a massive soup of a universe full of strange phenomena... Pi is not a universal truth, it is a tool to obtain what we want from the strangeness around us. So is toilet paper, but neither are universal.


And commonsense would say that what people believe is inevitably a result of its experiences(its experiences could include scientific meandering). : You do inspire a lot of thought in me, that is true but your missing something important. There aren`t many people whoose lives will change when they discover Pi, Internal combustion engine or solar panels. Well, life might change in a way of pride, finance etc.. But that won`t change the way you look at. An experience comes through your senses and is thought over by your mind. A life changing experience is something which contradicts our previous understanding of things. For example now, I`m kinda thinking my parents will always be around for me and I think I`ll father a child. However when these things happen, they will change the way I think about things. It doesn`t matter if I discover cold fusion, when my mother or brother dies I`m going to be very deeply effected by that depending on the circumstances.

So what your saying is true in theory, however:

"Our ability (or inability) to imbue our observed word with meaning will always be influenced by the experiences that we have participated in prior to the point in time at which the interpretation takes place., both in our own lives, and within the context of accumulated knowledge through our species existence,"

Pay attention to the last bit of the sentence, context of accumulated knowledge through our species existence. Those are your building very basic building blocks and you have unconciously absorbed all of this from the time your parents were telling you off and teaching you how to speak this language. If I was to raise you telling you that in our religgeon, you had to invent a cure for AIDS to transcend or something and you found that cure, it would change your life. It would be a climax. However this change of mood and climax is very relative to what you have been taught, and as you realise things like a scientific break through can only change peoples lifes which we call "nerds" if it can I guess...

And if we are to say that our experiences effect us also upoun our basic habitats such as ego, jelousy, pride etc etc.. we just aren`t a reliable source for universal information of any sorts.... The only thing universal is what is around, not our thoughts and not what we think about whats around us. Just what is right in front of you and what is which you are made of.

Vaping DMT really helped me to get a further unbiased looks at life and it cannot be described, just like everything else. Its just there and you view it with your senses and process it with your thoughts and the result is an illusion.

Did you know when some humans which have arms or legs amputated on (amputee`s), can feel pain in nonexistant limbs just as if they were still there and it feels as real as real can be for the human being. If you have noticed, when we go to the dentist and are administered a local anaesthetic our lips go numb and feel swollen. They arent swollen at all, our brain is such an amazing computer that it is computing a "feeling" to replace the one which we lost from the lip by the anesthetic. Its not quite the best fit, its slightly bigger than normal but it feels real to us. Can you even imagine what virtual reality is capable of?

So in the future, I can imagine no use for drugs anymore when we create biological computers and make connections to our brain like in the matrix. These highly recreational devices will have to be banned for the future of humanity. I studied electronics for 6 years and I can just imagine our brain as a closed loop system with this other computer living a completely different reality from the illusion we previously called reality, we may be able to create new senses by re-wring our brain. During doing this we will realise we can think or feel anything and there is an infinate variety of pleasures in the universe. This is the ultimate point hedonism can get to and it will do eventually.

But this example proves a lot of points. This drove me a bit insane when I was first thinking like this, lol I didn`t retaliate with rebellion and violence however...

+Rep Rodart, you don`t speak bullshit when you type!
 

Tenner

Well-Known Member
And you said it earlier that there really isn't a connection between "everything is illusory" and "lets kill others". I mean if everything was illusory then others wouldn't exist making that act of killing them ultimately a fallacy.

This person is not a good example to use.

Peace
I`m not using the person, I`m using the way he thought not that of killing, but of illusions and shit. Just remove the killer bit and look at his thought pattern before that. Imagine things the way he did lol
 

Puffer Fish

Well-Known Member
I would have to guess it is because of the people who use it, or what the people who use it tend to believe/realize while they are on it. In fact heres a quote from someone:

"Its sort of a paradox, to end the drug war we need to accept a new way for understanding, using drugs will tend to precipitate the exact experience we need to understand." -Don't know who.

Then why its illegal is either because of what it turns people into, or what people use it. Obviously making people bad-shit nuts is specious because there isn't a real concern of thats; and absolutely functioning and benign people do use it(and increasingly so I tend to notice) and remain functioning and benign afterward.

It could be the common emotionality people will sense which could be the end of power for the elite. Or it could just be as was said by eyez, it help connect abstract ideas creating a form of intelligence that could be the end to power for the elite.

This is proven by the fact that people being scared like an elusive boogey man that it is, and its still illegal. Its a power structure that would crumble because of individual thought.

Peace
I echo you in thoughts here ... my friend.
Building on this way of thinking .... can you imagine ... a direct
impact of LSD in different fields ... as per proper study/use/application.
Withing a context used by ... 'people of healthy mind'. ?
 

Rodart Cockburn

New Member
I gotta say Tenner, lots of this is filled with non-sequiturs so I am going to show you the fuck up!

Yes, I`m saying science isn`t reason. Scientific and philosophical, even logical thinking leads to a chaoticnot so sequence of questioning reality. Science works by questioning things and getting the answer. You are however, thinking of science to be something which will answer our reason of existence, this is not possible. Why is it not possible? I explained earlier. Scienc and logic will keep asking, why? And for every question there has to be an answer and reason. What will happen in the end, infinite questioning and infinite answers?No, the ideal of science is to refute an infinite regress. There cannot be an infinite sequence of event meaning that we could find conclusion(just because we haven't doesn't mean anything) It just CANT give us a logical answer.... I mean oh yea, religgeon can do that by telling people asking questions that god made them and to stop questioning his existence and have faith, therefore allowing them to be ignorant. Don`t be confused by what logic and science actually give us, they will never give us reason, they will give us benefits. The ability to manipulate everything around us to our own benefit and compare things around us.I as well recognize that all logic requires faith, just as Kant has proven. And just so, true knowledge can never exist but that doesn't mean a logical evaluation can't give us reason(we just need a language like math).

If you think of some electronical part, e.g logical comparator in electronics which compares 2 signals to tell which of them is bigger. Thats the function of that electronic part part, the function of our brains are to keep us alive and reproducing... Do you think evolution gives a damn about finding an answer even if it is possible? So just like the Comparator, (its called an OPAMP actually) we can compare things and weight up odds, we can say a rock just hurt our leg and we could hurt someone else with it, realise that fire works.I have no fucking clue. Is this supposed to prove something? Science agrees, things are.

Don`t let our advancement in science, we are still comparing and making analogys and this will never change. Even if you know there is an electron or somethings gaining or losing electrons in chemistry this isn`t universal at all. Its your notation of an phenomenon in our universe and everyone will look at that phenomenon with a different perspective. What you are doing, is making note of this phenomenon and its properties and how to use it, you cannot move beyond that. Thats what our brains are ment to do, as a specie what will knowing why we exist really do for us anyway, would it make a difference if you knew or not?I am not saying by understanding how the world works we will turn into ethereal pan dimensional all knowing beings, but we could use science to instill comfort for people and even apply it to political practice.

Like pi for example, that is a universal truth : Pi is in our own notation, I don`t have to remind you numbers don`t actually exist they are our notation of a phenomenon. If you drew a picture of a tree would that be universal for all the entities on planet earth? What about something with a different perspective, like a bat for example. It will see with sound and therefore disagree with you. If you don't know, Pi is the ratio of the area of circle to the area of a square the same length as the circles diameter. This will be the same no matter what size of circle you use(3.14). And lets be clear, many things in our mathematics require it.

Look at it this way, we are in a massive soup of a universe full of strange phenomena... Pi is not a universal truth, it is a tool to obtain what we want from the strangeness around us. So is toilet paper, but neither are universal.I'm not arguing that someone needs to use pi or know how to find it, but regardless there is no other pi if that makes sense. Pi will always be pi( unless its named something else but the notion still exists.


And commonsense would say that what people believe is inevitably a result of its experiences(its experiences could include scientific meandering). : You do inspire a lot of thought in me, that is true but your missing something important. There aren`t many people whoose lives will change when they discover Pi, Internal combustion engine or solar panels. Have you ever invented those things? I myself would be pretty ecstatic, I'm sure other intellectuals of the time were too. Well, life might change in a way of pride, finance etc.. But that won`t change the way you look at.Einstein fought tooth and nail against quantum physics because of spooky action, by the end of his life he had reformed his opinions making room for the new age. An experience comes through your senses and is thought over by your mind. A life changing experience is something which contradicts our previous understanding of things. For example now, I`m kinda thinking my parents will always be around for me and I think I`ll father a child. However when these things happen, they will change the way I think about things. It doesn`t matter if I discover cold fusion, when my mother or brother dies I`m going to be very deeply effected by that depending on the circumstances. I really don't know what that has to do with anything, maybe cause science is cold and impersonal? Can you reason why you would feel sad, other than the cliche 'I love them'?

So what your saying is true in theory, however:

"Our ability (or inability) to imbue our observed word with meaning will always be influenced by the experiences that we have participated in prior to the point in time at which the interpretation takes place., both in our own lives, and within the context of accumulated knowledge through our species existence,"This is true only to the extent that language is the accumulated knowledge, language itself being a tool to relay thoughts.

Pay attention to the last bit of the sentence, context of accumulated knowledge through our species existence. Those are your building very basic building blocks and you have unconciously absorbed all of this from the time your parents were telling you off and teaching you how to speak this language.Everything you think about is spoken to yourself using the language you were taught, the limitation of the language will limit your view on reality. If I was to raise you telling you that in our religgeon, you had to invent a cure for AIDS to transcend or something and you found that cure, it would change your life. It would be a climax. However this change of mood and climax is very relative to what you have been taught, and as you realise things like a scientific break through can only change peoples lifes which we call "nerds" if it can I guess... So your saying everything is relative to the person and no real truths lie out in the universe?

And if we are to say that our experiences effect us also upoun our basic habitats such as ego, jelousy, pride etc etc.. we just aren`t a reliable source for universal information of any sorts.... The only thing universal is what is around, not our thoughts and not what we think about whats around us. Just what is right in front of you and what is which you are made of. Does science not seek to discover this?

Vaping DMT really helped me to get a further unbiased looks at life and it cannot be described, just like everything else. Its just there and you view it with your senses and process it with your thoughts and the result is an illusion. But I don't get your point, science agree's and tries to quantify it.....Just like the english your using. And sure just leaving it be may make someone happier, but that doesn't mean science is not logical.

Did you know when some humans which have arms or legs amputated on (amputee`s), can feel pain in nonexistant limbs just as if they were still there and it feels as real as real can be for the human being. If you have noticed, when we go to the dentist and are administered a local anaesthetic our lips go numb and feel swollen. They arent swollen at all, our brain is such an amazing computer that it is computing a "feeling" to replace the one which we lost from the lip by the anesthetic. Its not quite the best fit, its slightly bigger than normal but it feels real to us.And what does that have to do with maths ability to quantify things? In that video "the secret life of chaos" they make the point that even with their most accurate equations nuances appear making chaos. This is because we haven't been given the information to make an accurate picture. We would need the whole picture, which just isn't in the cards right now. Can you even imagine what virtual reality is capable of? Only possible because of math I should point out.

So in the future, I can imagine no use for drugs anymore when we create biological computers and make connections to our brain like in the matrix. These highly recreational devices will have to be banned for the future of humanity. I studied electronics for 6 years and I can just imagine our brain as a closed loop system with this other computer living a completely different reality from the illusion we previously called reality, we may be able to create new senses by re-wring our brain. During doing this we will realise we can think or feel anything and there is an infinate variety of pleasures in the universe. This is the ultimate point hedonism can get to and it will do eventually.

But this example proves a lot of points. This drove me a bit insane when I was first thinking like this, lol I didn`t retaliate with rebellion and violence however...

+Rep Rodart, you don`t speak bullshit when you type!
I really don't know what to say. To argue science has no reason, then say only the human experience has reason, then say that humans are not reliable agents because they are dependent on the past, then say that we should use science to change our 'illusory' experience.

It seems you yourself are not able to resist sounding profound. You circle back on yourself, if you can't feel the dissonance I would take a break from using drugs for a while.

Peace
 

Rodart Cockburn

New Member
I am pretty sure there have been studies before where the creative aspect is almost conclusive, and creativity can be applied from anything from computer design, to chair design, to equation design. Just like eyez said, its able to connect abstract consistently. When I was on it once, I had the underling notion that what I was experiencing was the movement of an electric impulse down a neuron insofar as I was the electric current and as it was subjected to the coding inside each neuron it would elicit a perceptual response. This being so each consecutive frame was built on top of itself, and then looped over and over again. I know its hard to explain with you not being me and all.

I have used it to create storylines like you wouldn't imagine. And jokes are fucking awesome to create, mind you have to have a jokey kind of mind or else it feels fairly forced. Most of my jokes fly right over the heads of most people especially my parents. And they aren't really punchliney jokey-jokes either, more like extended observations interspersed with running gags and embarrassment. I digress, it could be used by anyone of sound mind desiring of it. We would need to educate the population on the real LSD.

Peace
 

Tenner

Well-Known Member
I gotta say Tenner, lots of this is filled with non-sequiturs so I am going to show you the fuck up!



I really don't know what to say. To argue science has no reason, then say only the human experience has reason, then say that humans are not reliable agents because they are dependent on the past, then say that we should use science to change our 'illusory' experience.

It seems you yourself are not able to resist sounding profound. You circle back on yourself, if you can't feel the dissonance I would take a break from using drugs for a while.

Peace
I don`t feel shown up at all. I said science can provide a more unbiased view than normal beliefs, which by I mean science is still our creation and still is a part of humanity therefore has its own limits. And I do know what Pi is, I use it everyday.

I don`t think your imagining things the way im doing. I was trying to explain how unreliable our reality was and things arent the way we think they are. I cant argue with what you are saying as its true in your level of reality.

My question is will you ever be able to think unlike a human
 

Puffer Fish

Well-Known Member
My question is will you ever be able to think unlike a human
Brother, this is the essence of 'what it is'
What is it that makes u human or him ... alien to your perception of reality ?
Perhaps most humans these days are 'distracted' by the wrong things ?'
In order to be able to tap into what 'human thought' is ?

Ask yourself ... what drives ....what we do .....perhaps profit/greed or survival through surplus .... ?
Perhaps at this stage ... most brains are not advanced enough to think of 'WE' first .... ?

Some might be able to tap into this .... through the use of mind enhancers/meditation ... lsd.
The ones distracted will remain distracted ...

[video=youtube;O2QJvc_SxFQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2QJvc_SxFQ&feature=player_embedded[/video]

:)
 

Rodart Cockburn

New Member
I don`t feel shown up at all. I said science can provide a more unbiased view than normal beliefs, which by I mean science is still our creation and still is a part of humanity therefore has its own limits. And I do know what Pi is, I use it everyday.

I don`t think your imagining things the way im doing. I was trying to explain how unreliable our reality was and things arent the way we think they are. I cant argue with what you are saying as its true in your level of reality.

My question is will you ever be able to think unlike a human
Well clearly the is all a misunderstanding based on the use of the word reality. Reality means the world in the state as it exists, not the idealistic or notional parts. You may argue that that is simply the relative mind of ones personality and experience, I would argue that the entire universe exists while acknowledging the internal world created by the universal.

I would also state there can't be different 'levels' of reality. Reality is one and indivisible.

Peace
 

Tenner

Well-Known Member
I would also state there can't be different 'levels' of reality. Reality is one and indivisible.

Peace
I agree with most of what you said in this topic but some opinions differ.

Well, I call this reality as its the only one which makes sense and works for me, however, for other beings things or states of mind reality is radically different than what we know it as.

I guess we have evolved to make pretty good sense of whats around is in our normal state of mind so its pretty reliable even though we are seeing a fraction of the big picture.
 

Rodart Cockburn

New Member
I'm not even saying that we can sense the real world. But logically there has to be candlelights within our reference that we can use to elucidate a more accurate picture of reality. If there wasn't then this chaotic mess would seem much more chaotic. I mean we sense time moving forward but certain theorems would argue that time can't exist as we sense it.

Good exchange, I admit what you were saying certainly had kernels I could follow all the way through, and I do get what your saying.

Peace
 

EyeZ

Member
I disagree; reality is not one and indivisible. Reality is, by definition, based upon perspective. Therefor, there is millions of realities. There is a baseline, some things that just are, as we know them, however, go to another planet or universe and all of these things may no longer 'just be'. For example, Keplers law of universal gravitation. This law works for all planets we have tested it on. However, if we were to leave our universe, is it guaranteed to be the same ? Most definitely not.

So while gravity is a reality for us, it does not mean it is a reality everywhere else! The fact that objects remain rooted to the planet by a mysterious force based upon mass is not necessarily true on all planets, in all universes. Now, it's not necessarily not true, but there are many, many things that are like this. Science is a reality for us, but is it for monkeys? Or dolphins? Or other sentient beings?

As an example from a previous post, what do you think a bat perceives reality as ? It probably recognizes solid objects from non-solid objects, yes. So reality for a bat is something is solid, or not solid, not whether its blue or green. And reality for an amoeba? Or something else really, really, really small that could pass through most objects we consider solid? Obviously, if it can pass through a solid object, then its no longer solid, is it?

Perhaps existence in itself is one and indivisible, but existence is merely one section of reality.

Edit: To add to this, technically we cannot call anything visual reality because what we see is simply the work of light refracting within our eyes : some people cannot see, some people see green, some people see the same thing as blue. In reality, what would it be? One would say nothing, for he cannot see it, one would say green, for he sees green, and one would see blue, for he see blue. This applies to thoughts, as well,
 

Rodart Cockburn

New Member
No, because for a definition of reality is has to take all nuances into account. Like how it is possible that so many people can have different perspectives, how it is possible that gravity doesn't work in other universes. The very fact you accept the notion of other universes means that its part of your/reality.

I am not talking about visual reality, but mental reality; a mental reality that allows languages and math to arise. This includes the way we perceive things inherently or else reality wouldn't be able to exist, "Cogito Ergo Sum"-Descartes, this is why we have a medium of consensus between us.

Existence is reality, the clearly apparent is that you exist in some form or another.

Peace
 

EyeZ

Member
But how can we define reality as "reality" when we don't know all nuances ourselves? Like I said, we don't know what is and isn't in other universes... we've gathered brief glimpses, but is sentient life forms on another planet "reality"? I understand your point, but by your logic, then if god exists, then god is a reality too right ? But what is god ? If I define god as existence, then yes, god is a reality. But, if you define god as a all-powerful sentient being, and god really does exist, then could god not change any of our "reality" into non-existence, therefor making it not reality?

Mentally, there are things that are not the same among everyone. If one man claims to have, and completely and utterly believes with all his heart, that he has met god, or an alien, then that is reality to him, but to you, or me, it may not be. So, if one man experiences one reality, but another experiences a completely different reality, does that mean that two realities are a single reality?

If so, how is that possible? As I said before, language is made possible through similar thought patterns that are portrayed by a word that we have made. However, a persons interpretations of anothers words can be as different as english as english is different from chinese. There is a baseline, and I believe that to be existence. The properties of those existences, however, is infinitely different. Even mentally, without language, an object of any sort can be viewed differently among others. While we might be able to say that our own minds exist, and we may be able to logically say that our bodies exist, what is the medium of consensus between us when referring to the unknown?
 

Rodart Cockburn

New Member
But how can we define reality as "reality" when we don't know all nuances ourselves? Like I said, we don't know what is and isn't in other universes... we've gathered brief glimpses, but is sentient life forms on another planet "reality"? I understand your point, but by your logic, then if god exists, then god is a reality too right ? But what is god ? If I define god as existence, then yes, god is a reality. But, if you define god as a all-powerful sentient being, and god really does exist, then could god not change any of our "reality" into non-existence, therefor making it not reality? Ok, yes I get what your saying, but we have a common understanding between participants how this individual sense of reality can arise, we each have different brains and different experiences(in fact no two experiences are the same), by this mode each experience we all have different concerns and ideals. But by moving past that to things that occur uniformly across our perceptions we can idealize on the objective world. Like the time it takes for a ball to fall from a tower, or the movement of heavenly bodies.

Mentally, there are things that are not the same among everyone. If one man claims to have, and completely and utterly believes with all his heart, that he has met god, or an alien, then that is reality to him, but to you, or me, it may not be. So, if one man experiences one reality, but another experiences a completely different reality, does that mean that two realities are a single reality? of course, either it did or didn't happen, unfortunately we don't have all the variables, but it doesn't me we couldn't.

If so, how is that possible? As I said before, language is made possible through similar thought patterns that are portrayed by a word that we have made. However, a persons interpretations of anothers words can be as different as english as english is different from chinese. There is a baseline, and I believe that to be existence. The properties of those existences, however, is infinitely different. Even mentally, without language, an object of any sort can be viewed differently among others. While we might be able to say that our own minds exist, and we may be able to logically say that our bodies exist, what is the medium of consensus between us when referring to the unknown?
Like I pointed out, if we are to use reason it must be based on faith making true knowledge impossible. However inability to accept things that can be objectively confirmed is referred to as a paradoxical skepticism because the skeptic would act to prove.

Peace
 
Top