not only admissible, but thoroughly examined. intent and motive are key in murder cases.your character is admisable in court.
huge improvement over his first choice though.Zimmermans lawyer is not seeming to bright either, but we shall see
I guess its just the Zimm putting him in a compromising position. Having to go in front of the camera to try an explain why your client is an idiot and a liar with "its just a misunderstanding"huge improvement over his first choice though.
"No no, I stay, I clean..."did zimmy get plastic surgery?
give this guy some tits and let him clean hotel rooms!
Same response as last time.Trust more facts to come. Only fools and idiots really support the Zimman now.
translation:Same response as last time.
"You must join the lynch mob or we will say NI! to you a second time."
Let me translate what you said here.I guess it's ok to do if you have a gun cause you can shoot if you think they stepped out of line, eh?
So if you come up on someone who has a ccw and your in a SYG, MMD state it's ok to shoot em, not assault them?
I think this law has fucked this case. the people that perpertrate it are fucking shitbags, IMHO
shitheel said:Those murderers, rapists and thieves have every right to rape, murder and steal!!
no Hypocricy, but plenty of misinformation. Many Many Many Non Profits pay their directors VEry Very well. Some of the bigger non profits pay their directors $300,000+ per year. http://philanthropy.com/article/Chart-Nonprofit-Pay-Salary/64434/merely pointing out that buying luxury cars is not within the boundaries of running a non-profit.
no hypocrisy here,
Correct me Uncle Buck if I am mistaken but I believe UB's quote was saying only shady non profits would pay enough to have even the Director owning a rich car.NoDrama:7525024 said:no Hypocricy, but plenty of misinformation. Many Many Many Non Profits pay their directors VEry Very well. Some of the bigger non profits pay their directors $300,000+ per year. http://philanthropy.com/article/Chart-Nonprofit-Pay-Salary/64434/merely pointing out that buying luxury cars is not within the boundaries of running a non-profit.
no hypocrisy here,
Many times the director gets a percentage of all the money coming in, soooo If your non profit rakes in $50 million annually, you might be seeing pay of up to $500,000 a year or more.
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/salary-executive-director-nonprofit-percentage-budget-17944.html
Inspirational network's Director David Cerullo makes about $2 million a year directing that non profit.
http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/top_25_list/2012/05/inspirational-networks-cerullo.html
Can you buy a luxury car if you only make $200,000 a year?
You can push your narrative all you like and I will continue to point out every time you and the "gang" pronounce judgement based on conjecture. I still put it at 50/50 on which of them assaulted the other first, and I still believe that will determine the outcome of the trial. Everything else is window dressing.translation:
Lets see Zimmerman followed Trayvon----Zimmerman got out of his car to follow Trayvon---Zimmerman told not needed to follow----but yet you still have it 50/50... dude stop the BS and at least be a man and say you support Zimmerman 100%. We see you for what you are.You can push your narrative all you like and I will continue to point out every time you and the "gang" pronounce judgement based on conjecture. I still put it at 50/50 on which of them assaulted the other first, and I still believe that will determine the outcome of the trial. Everything else is window dressing.
So tell me genius, since you were there, you can say with absolute certainty that Martin didn't assault Zimmerman for following him? Shut the fuck up, you condescending little prick. Don't try to tell me what I think, you can barely articulate rational thoughts of your own on this forum. Just because you have your weak little mind made up, doesn't mean we all have to come to the same conclusion.Lets see Zimmerman followed Trayvon----Zimmerman got out of his car to follow Trayvon---Zimmerman told not needed to follow----but yet you still have it 50/50... dude stop the BS and at least be a man and say you support Zimmerman 100%. We see you for what you are.
guess I hit a nerve...lol. Stop trying to pretend...One difference between you and me.. I can stand up for mine, while you pretend to be non-bias. Dude again you see through. I can pretty much go back and read all your post and see just how you stand. You have not been yourself ever sense Obama became your President...LOLSo tell me genius, since you were there, you can say with absolute certainty that Martin didn't assault Zimmerman for following him? Shut the fuck up, you condescending little prick. Don't try to tell me what I think, you can barely articulate rational thoughts of your own on this forum. Just because you have your weak little mind made up, doesn't mean we all have to come to the same conclusion.
Let me repeat, for the dullards, I don't know or presume to guess who started the actual physical assault, and I firmly believe that will decide the outcome. If you have video or something OTHER than conjecture, I'll be glad to consider it. Sorry I'm not willing to jump on your little bandwagon and convict him because YOU say so.
What an idiot.