Zimmerman shot in face.

londonfog

Well-Known Member
OJ murdered two people. Isn't it obvious that Zimmerman is guilty of murder?

The stupid. It burns!
OJ did not murder anyone remember. OJ was found not guilty.:roll:
Casey Anthony had nothing to do with the death of her child even if she lied about her whereabouts.:roll: The jury has spoken.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
OJ did not murder anyone remember. OJ was found not guilty.:roll:
Casey Anthony had nothing to do with the death of her child even if she lied about her whereabouts.:roll: The jury has spoken.
And neither case has anything to do with the other.

Self defense. It's a universal human right.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So you think Neighborhood Watch should be banned?
zimmerman was not acting as part of neighborhood watch when he murdered the unarmed black kid though.

neighborhood watch is supposed to watch, not follow harass and stalk without identifying yourself. also, no guns. zimmy went out there with two flashlights and a loaded gun, safety off because he was tired of "these assholes [who] always get away".

thanks for being dumb though red.

i know you can't help yourself when it comes to idolizing people who shoot unarmed black kids.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No, Trayvon attacked Zimmerman.
there's no evidence of that.

in fact, zimmerman himself said martin ran away. as did jeantel.

the only evidence that we do have is that zimmerman went out into the dark with two flashlights and a loaded handgun, was looking for an address where non existed, and didn't know where he wanted dispatch to meet him because he was gonna be out hunting this kid down with his handgun.

all that evidence would lead anyone who is not a klan member to believe that zimmerman was on the offense, and the unarmed black kid who ran away was simply trying to protect himself.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Self defense. It's a universal human right.
i agree.

if i were martin, and i had a creepy stranger following me home in the dark with a loaded handgun without identifying himself, i'd have every right to shoot that fucker dead.

but self defense does not include getting out of your car with two flashlights and a gun and chasing down unarmed black kids, now does it?
 

NewtoMJ

Well-Known Member
"could blind someone", "I didn't know"? Where is the information?
Where is what information? The information that broken glass can blind someone? Or the post where I said I didn't know the extent of his injury? Page three is my post. If broken glass can send someone to a hospital, surely it can damage an eye. Or is that beyond your ability to understand?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Two flashlights! Two. TWO!!

How many flashlights does one man need? Somebody could be blinded, for God's sake. Think of the children!!!

LULZ
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
zimmerman was not acting as part of neighborhood watch when he murdered the unarmed black kid though.

neighborhood watch is supposed to watch, not follow harass and stalk without identifying yourself. also, no guns. zimmy went out there with two flashlights and a loaded gun, safety off because he was tired of "these assholes [who] always get away".

thanks for being dumb though red.

i know you can't help yourself when it comes to idolizing people who shoot unarmed black kids.
Come on, Buck. We all know you would just fill your diaper and cry.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Come on, Buck. We all know you would just fill your diaper and cry.
why do you ignore my questions pertaining to your rhetoric, and its exact similarities to white supremacy rhetoric i have cited?

did you arrive at your white supremacy rhetoric independently and by coincidence, or are you a follower who soaks up white supremacy rhetoric and then just repeats it?

it has to be one or the other, why are you too cowardly to answer such a simple question?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I drove a bug so far up the pooper's ass, he doesn't know whether to shit or go blind. Buck, you're my bitch, admit it.
why are you too cowardly to answer questions about the eerie similarities between your rhetoric and that of non-cowardly, admitted white supremacists?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Zimmerman had a Kel-Tec PF9 pistol
It has an internal hammer block safety that cannot be turned off, ever, by anyone. Turning it off would require that you destroy the pistol.
so no safety at all then, bullet chambered, getting out of his car and running after an unarmed black kid without identifying himself is self defense?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
so you just pull the trigger and it fires, no need to do anything else, no need to flip the safety?

yep, that's what i thought.

next thing you know you'll be telling me that getting out of your car with your loaded gun to chase an unarmed black kid who is running away qualifies as self defense.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
so you just pull the trigger and it fires, no need to do anything else, no need to flip the safety?

yep, that's what i thought.

next thing you know you'll be telling me that getting out of your car with your loaded gun to chase an unarmed black kid who is running away qualifies as self defense.
Why would you want a gun to not fire when you pull the trigger? The reason you are pulling the trigger is so that you can fire the gun.
Triggers cannot pull themselves, only someone who is delusional thinks that could happen and then justify a external safety that makes it impossible to pull the trigger.

You know so very little about firearms other than they fire a bullet out of them, that is the extent of your knowledge.

Can a single action revolver fire all of its rounds off just by pulling the trigger?
Can a double action revolver fire all of its rounds off simply by pulling the trigger?
Can a single action pistol fire all of its rounds off simply by pulling the trigger?
Can a double action pistol fire off all of its rounds off simply by pulling the trigger?

You won't be able to answer a single one of these questions correctly because you are ignorant of anything about firearms and how they work. You have already demonstrated this clearly, but your hole digging does amuse me.
 

god1

Well-Known Member
Why would you want a gun to not fire when you pull the trigger? The reason you are pulling the trigger is so that you can fire the gun.
Triggers cannot pull themselves, only someone who is delusional thinks that could happen and then justify a external safety that makes it impossible to pull the trigger.

You know so very little about firearms other than they fire a bullet out of them, that is the extent of your knowledge.

Can a single action revolver fire all of its rounds off just by pulling the trigger?
Can a double action revolver fire all of its rounds off simply by pulling the trigger?
Can a single action pistol fire all of its rounds off simply by pulling the trigger?
Can a double action pistol fire off all of its rounds off simply by pulling the trigger?

You won't be able to answer a single one of these questions correctly because you are ignorant of anything about firearms and how they work. You have already demonstrated this clearly, but your hole digging does amuse me.

You're going to confuse him, you used the terms "pistol and revolver" --- thank goodness you didn't use "auto".
He's not alone, there's some really dumb shit's in here with regard to life in general, and how stuff works.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Why would you want a gun to not fire when you pull the trigger?
for safety reasons, hence why you would want a safety on a gun.

you have any idea how many kids have killed themselves or their parents or their friends this year alone?

Triggers cannot pull themselves, only someone who is delusional thinks that could happen and then justify a external safety that makes it impossible to pull the trigger.
so how many dead kids are you OK with so that you don't have to be bothered taking a small fraction of time to flip a safety?
 
Top