Which Candidate has imploded more rapidly?

[desert dude]

No there isnt.
And Unwanted babies usually grow up to vote Democratic. I am surprised you are for unwanted babies but against amnesty

I am not for unwanted babies. I am against the killing of babies. Even if every baby born in America from now on grew up to be a Democrat, I would still oppose murdering them. Do you support murdering babies that will likely grow up to be Republicans?

Amnesty for illegal aliens, I presume, is a totally different topic.

 

[UncleBuck]

What a woman does with her body is her business. There is a third person in the calculus of abortion.

more loaded language. a person and a fetus are two different things.

keep arguing to limit liberty, you libertarian you.

 

[UncleBuck]

I am against the killing of babies.

that makes two of us.

a fetus, however, is much different from a person.

Amnesty for illegal aliens, I presume, is a totally different topic.

which you no doubt have a whole bunch of racist, anti-liberty views to express about.

 

[desert dude]

more loaded language. a person and a fetus are two different things.

keep arguing to limit liberty, you libertarian you.

Isn't that the excuse most mass murderers make: "That's not a person, that's a Jew..."

 

[Pinworm]

Isn't that the excuse most mass murderers make: "That's not a person, that's a Jew..."

I hear someone mumbling. I can't make out what he's saying. It sounds like he has a huge uncircumcised penis in his mouth.

 

[UncleBuck]

Isn't that the excuse most mass murderers make: "That's not a person, that's a Jew..."

so you're comparing a woman struggling with one of the toughest decisions she will ever have to live with to a psychopathic mass murdering anti-semite?

how about some perspective, sistah?

 

[Pinworm]

apparently, worrying and fretting about your own health and ability to commit the next 18+ years of your life is akin to bringing a high powered, semi-automatic gun with a high capacity magazine into a school and wiping out a classroom full of kindergarteners.

[video=youtube;igtHi47B6JU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igtHi47B6JU[/video]

Apparently so. Shoot the kids at school, and rock the 40 oz.

 

[ChesusRice]

I am not for unwanted babies. I am against the killing of babies. Even if every baby born in America from now on grew up to be a Democrat, I would still oppose murdering them. Do you support murdering babies that will likely grow up to be Republicans?

Amnesty for illegal aliens, I presume, is a totally different topic.

But abortion doesnt kill babies
So you have no argument

 

[desert dude]

But abortion doesnt kill babies
So you have no argument

The distinction between a fetus at 40 weeks and a baby born four weeks premature is that one can be vacuumed away with no legal consequences while the other is a "person" and must, by law, be cared for and nurtured. Is that about right?

 

[ChesusRice]

The distinction between a fetus at 40 weeks and a baby born four weeks premature is that one can be vacuumed away with no legal consequences while the other is a "person" and must, by law, be cared for and nurtured. Is that about right?

One is born and is wanted
The other is a parasitic organism that is up to the host to decide

 

[Pinworm]

Is that about right?

Negative.....................

 

[UncleBuck]

 

[heckler73]

The distinction between a fetus at 40 weeks and a baby born four weeks premature is that one can be vacuumed away with no legal consequences while the other is a "person" and must, by law, be cared for and nurtured. Is that about right?

That must be one helluva vacuum.
Is it made by Dyson?

 

[desert dude]

What's with all you misogynists opposing what a majority of women want. Pinhead, these women have fully functional vaginas, hence their opinion is valid. If you were post-op, you would be allowed to have an opinion, well, maybe half of a valid opinion.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ho-likes-the-gops-20-week-abortion-ban-women/

A new Quinnipiac poll shows 60 percent of women prefer allowing unrestricted abortions for only the first 20 weeks of pregnancy rather than the Supreme Court-prescribed 24 weeks. Among men, 50 percent support the 20-week law — a 10-point gap.


A Washington Post-ABC News poll showed the gap at seven points, while two other polls (from NBC/Wall Street Journal and National Journal) showed it at six and four, respectively.
And those numbers may actually understate support among women for the new restrictions.


In the Post-ABC poll, rather than choosing between a 20-week ban and the current 24 weeks, 8 percent of women volunteered that abortion should never be legal, and 3 percent volunteered that the window should be smaller than 20 weeks. If you add them to the 60 percent of women who support the 20-week abortion ban, then 71 percent of women would seem to support the effort to increase abortion restrictions.


The Quinnipiac poll, meanwhile, shows 60 percent of women support the 20-week ban and 8 percent volunteer that it should never be legal, which again suggests that two-thirds of women could be supportive.


Support in the other two polls does not show quite as much support among women, but in each case, there are more women who support the ban than oppose it.

Taken as a whole, it's pretty clear that women are broadly supportive of the ban — and they support it in bigger numbers than men.

 

[ChesusRice]

pretty damn hot

 

[UncleBuck]

What's with all you misogynists opposing what a majority of women want. Pinhead, these women have fully functional vaginas, hence their opinion is valid. If you were post-op, you would be allowed to have an opinion, well, maybe half of a valid opinion.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ho-likes-the-gops-20-week-abortion-ban-women/

A new Quinnipiac poll shows 60 percent of women prefer allowing unrestricted abortions for only the first 20 weeks of pregnancy rather than the Supreme Court-prescribed 24 weeks. Among men, 50 percent support the 20-week law — a 10-point gap.


A Washington Post-ABC News poll showed the gap at seven points, while two other polls (from NBC/Wall Street Journal and National Journal) showed it at six and four, respectively.
And those numbers may actually understate support among women for the new restrictions.


In the Post-ABC poll, rather than choosing between a 20-week ban and the current 24 weeks, 8 percent of women volunteered that abortion should never be legal, and 3 percent volunteered that the window should be smaller than 20 weeks. If you add them to the 60 percent of women who support the 20-week abortion ban, then 71 percent of women would seem to support the effort to increase abortion restrictions.


The Quinnipiac poll, meanwhile, shows 60 percent of women support the 20-week ban and 8 percent volunteer that it should never be legal, which again suggests that two-thirds of women could be supportive.


Support in the other two polls does not show quite as much support among women, but in each case, there are more women who support the ban than oppose it.

Taken as a whole, it's pretty clear that women are broadly supportive of the ban — and they support it in bigger numbers than men.

90% of people support universal background checks. two thirds support a national registry. 60% support a limit on magazine capacities. more than 50% support an assault rifle ban.

i'm glad to know we have your support on this, desert dud.

 

[desert dude]

90% of people support universal background checks. two thirds support a national registry. 60% support a limit on magazine capacities. more than 50% support an assault rifle ban.

i'm glad to know we have your support on this, desert dud.

The constitution is a check on the tyranny of the majority, and on the power of would be tyrants, so it does not matter if 1% or 99% of the population supports something that is factually unconstitutional.

The constitution is silent on abortion, it is a hard pill to swallow but true. The declaration of independence embraces "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".

It's OK. I would not expect a progressive to know these things, and if he did I would expect him to denigrate them.

 

[UncleBuck]

The constitution is a check on the tyranny of the majority, and on the power of would be tyrants, so it does not matter if 1% or 99% of the population supports something that is factually unconstitutional.

thanks for making the argument that your polls are meaningless in the face of roe v. wade then.

by the way, none of the gun control measures i mentioned were inconsistent with the second, as per the heller decision.

so go cry now.

Pinhead prefers dicks. See his multiple posts of his buddy's engorged penis. If you look closely, you can see Pinhead's lip print around the shaft.

homophobia is a nice addition to the misogyny and racism i normally see coming from you.

 

[Doer]

The constitution is a check on the tyranny of the majority, and on the power of would be tyrants, so it does not matter if 1% or 99% of the population supports something that is factually unconstitutional.

The constitution is silent on abortion, it is a hard pill to swallow but true. The declaration of independence embraces "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".

It's OK. I would not expect a progressive to know these things, and if he did I would expect him to denigrate them.

99% is way more than plenty to change the Constitution to anything WE want.

 

[desert dude]

99% is way more than plenty to change the Constitution to anything WE want.

I agree. First though, you have to change it using the legal, constitutional method. You don't get to take a poll and then pass a law that soothes the idiot masses if that law is unconstitutional. When we do that, we no longer have a constitutional republic, we have rule by whim. Today's whim of violating the second amendment pleases many progressive idiots. Tomorrow's whim probably will outrage the progressive idiots.

SCOTUS has bent and tortured the constitution. As a result many people have simply said, "fuck you" to the government. The drug war is a prime example of the federal government entering territory where it is excluded by the constitution. Abortion is another. Both of those issues are rightly left to the states.