Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
and you believe bucky's crazy non-quote meme dumps.
you really are herping your way to derptown.
U.S. right wing extremists more deadly than jihadists
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
you really are herping your way to derptown.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
When you inject yourself you don't stimulate anything. things tend to inflate.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
actually it's called satire, mr. white-supremacy-defender.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what's funny is that your views on multiculturalism are exactly the same as the people who recite those 14 words.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
when you pretend bucky's hysterical race-baiting and insane accusations, you demonstrate how ignorant you really are.
had you simply googled those words + "ron paul quote" you would have gotten nothing but the comment section of the daily kos, and other rabid lefty middenheaps, yet not a single reliable source attributing those words to ron paul.
but that would have required thinking
if you avoid looking for yourself, and credulously take bucky's sterling word for it, you can then "honestly" repeat those lies "in good faith" all around the lefty echo-chamber.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
go away. there's a good idiot
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
according to you, this is not racist.
We believe that America’s Judeo-Christian heritage and European identity must be defended. Today, our glorious Western civilization is under assault from many directions. Three such threats will be discussed at this conference. First, the massive influx to the United States and Europe of Third-World immigrants who do not share our fundamental political and cultural values. Second, the threat from Islam, a militant ideology that is hostile to our society and, in principle, committed to destroying it. Third, because of the persistent disappointing performance of blacks (which many whites mistakenly blame on themselves) many whites have guilt feelings that undermine Western morale and deter us from dealing sensibly with the other threats.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
Protip: if you dont make yourself look like a fool, you wont have to get all whiney and butthurt.
killemsoftly
Well-Known Member
not whiny. not butthurt. you"re a child. go play in the park...like a good idiot
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Rawn Pawl can't say that he didn't know that was Don Black (former kkk grand wizard) when he posed for that photo with him. He must have known him since he not only refused to give back a campaign contribution from him. The fact that he was served a subpoena to testify at Don Black's trial thoroughly disproved the notion that he didn't know who his buddy was.
Then you face the fact that he had so many racist articles written for his newsletter.
AND OPPOSES THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT!
Rawn Pawl is racist as fuck.
Then you face the fact that he had so many racist articles written for his newsletter.
AND OPPOSES THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT!
Rawn Pawl is racist as fuck.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
don't forget that rawn and rend are still coordinating with white supremacists like jamie kelso from A3P.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
even if one concedes the point (which i do not) ron paul being a racist doesnt mitigate the left's rampant use of bullshit fake quotes, slander libel and calumny against him.
if you want to show he is racist, then DO SO.
making up lies "to get the message out" and slinging bullshit "for the greater good" is still all the left has in their playbook
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
MidwesternGro
Well-Known Member
Ron Paul is a racist who voted against MLK Jr day.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/96-1979/h578
He also said it was a national day to hate whitey in his racist newsletter.
MidwesternGro
Well-Known Member
Content of Ron Paul's racist newsletters:
"The newsletters drew attention for controversial content when raised as a campaign issue by Paul's opponent in the 1996 Congressional election, Charles "Lefty" Morris.[7]
Several articles in these newsletters contained statements that were criticized as racist or homophobic, such as, "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."[8][9][10][11]
An October 1992 article said, "even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense.... for the animals are coming."[12] Another newsletter suggested that black activists who wanted to rename New York City after Martin Luther King Jr. rename it "Welfaria," "Zooville," "Rapetown," "Dirtburg," or "Lazyopolis."[2]
An article titled "The Pink House" said "I miss the closet. Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities."[2][13][14] Another newsletter asserted that HIV-positive homosexuals "enjoy the pity and attention that comes with being sick" and approved of the slogan "Sodomy=Death."[2]
A number of the newsletters criticized civil rights activist Martin Luther King, Jr., calling him a pedophile and "lying socialist satyr".[2][15] These articles told readers that Paul had voted against making Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday a federal public holiday, saying "Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."[2][16][17] During the 2008 and 2012 presidential election campaigns, Paul and his supporters said that the passages denouncing King were not a reflection of Paul's own views because he considers King a "hero".[18][19][20]
In a January 2008 article in The New Republic, James Kirchick wrote that the newsletters "reveal decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays".[2][21] Kirchick said the newsletters made bigoted comments about Jews, citing its defense of chess champion Bobby Fisher, who Kirchick described as a Holocaust denier, was "politically incorrect on Jewish questions, for which he will never be forgiven, even though he is a Jew."[21] The newsletters also criticized the state of Israel. One investment letter called Israel “an aggressive, national socialist state”; a 1990 newsletter discussed the “tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to wok [sic] for the Mossad in their area of expertise”; one quoted a "Jewish friend" who said the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was a "setup by the Israeli Mossad".[2]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul_newsletters#Controversial_content
"During the 1996 reelection campaign Paul did not deny writing the newsletters,[22] and defended their content, saying that he opposed racism and his remarks about blacks had been taken out of context.[8][23][9]"
Yeah right.
"The newsletters drew attention for controversial content when raised as a campaign issue by Paul's opponent in the 1996 Congressional election, Charles "Lefty" Morris.[7]
Several articles in these newsletters contained statements that were criticized as racist or homophobic, such as, "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."[8][9][10][11]
An October 1992 article said, "even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense.... for the animals are coming."[12] Another newsletter suggested that black activists who wanted to rename New York City after Martin Luther King Jr. rename it "Welfaria," "Zooville," "Rapetown," "Dirtburg," or "Lazyopolis."[2]
An article titled "The Pink House" said "I miss the closet. Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities."[2][13][14] Another newsletter asserted that HIV-positive homosexuals "enjoy the pity and attention that comes with being sick" and approved of the slogan "Sodomy=Death."[2]
A number of the newsletters criticized civil rights activist Martin Luther King, Jr., calling him a pedophile and "lying socialist satyr".[2][15] These articles told readers that Paul had voted against making Martin Luther King, Jr.'s birthday a federal public holiday, saying "Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."[2][16][17] During the 2008 and 2012 presidential election campaigns, Paul and his supporters said that the passages denouncing King were not a reflection of Paul's own views because he considers King a "hero".[18][19][20]
In a January 2008 article in The New Republic, James Kirchick wrote that the newsletters "reveal decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays".[2][21] Kirchick said the newsletters made bigoted comments about Jews, citing its defense of chess champion Bobby Fisher, who Kirchick described as a Holocaust denier, was "politically incorrect on Jewish questions, for which he will never be forgiven, even though he is a Jew."[21] The newsletters also criticized the state of Israel. One investment letter called Israel “an aggressive, national socialist state”; a 1990 newsletter discussed the “tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to wok [sic] for the Mossad in their area of expertise”; one quoted a "Jewish friend" who said the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was a "setup by the Israeli Mossad".[2]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul_newsletters#Controversial_content
"During the 1996 reelection campaign Paul did not deny writing the newsletters,[22] and defended their content, saying that he opposed racism and his remarks about blacks had been taken out of context.[8][23][9]"
Yeah right.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
houston chronicle, may 23rd 1996, section A, page 29 for anyone who is interested in verifying that^^^^
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
so he voted against something, so he is racist.
if voting against something you like is racist, we shouldnt have votes at all, we should just do whatever you say and be happy that we can all bask in your munificence
the rest is all unsourced, citationless blather.
if you had the quote you would have supplied it, but you didnt.
Last edited:
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
meaningless copy/paste from some unknown asshole's OPINION about what was in the ron paul newsletters, and his OPINION that since ron paul didnt answer a charge that was never leveled, he must therefore be guilty.
wikiwisdom doesnt impress, nor does it educate. wikipedia is crowdsourced opinion, and in case you didnt know, the crowd is a bunch of idiots.
to whit:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
as midwestern pointed out, rawn pawl vited himself as the author of his own newsletters.
houston chronicle, may 23rd 1996, section A, page 29.
you're not a bat, no need to act like one.