Bill Nye owns Heritage retard on climate change

Nutes and Nugs

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE="Padawanbater2, post: 10483431, member: 232653" Well then shut the fuck up because you can't speak to me right now in English. [/QUOTE]

Youre actually less scary than my girlfriend
that is suffering from PMS.
 

WORDZofWORDZCRAFT

Well-Known Member
So, if you make a 'rule' that says ruddy people have to be white, then I show you a picture of a ruddy non-white person, what does that mean?

I'll wait patiently.
it means you're pulling a picture off of google that is from a website where the article agrees with me that arabs can't be ruddy.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
On the bright side, it looks like it will be at least 8-12 years before we have to deal with any tangible "push" from the zealots to implement suicidal legislation based on this bullshit. And time is the Progressive's worst enemy, it exposes their lies...every time.

On the down side, we'll have to keep listening to these Eco-Loons hawking their gloom and doom predictions and castigating disbelievers for that same amount of time.

Watch what these fuckers do, not what they say. If their mouths are moving, you can bet they're lying.
 

Ceepea

Well-Known Member
it means you're pulling a picture off of google that is from a website where the article agrees with me that arabs can't be ruddy.
WORRRRDDDDZZZZZ isn't just dumb..... he's ILLLLLITTTERRAAAAATTTTEEEEEE......

The definition of ruddy is 'having a healthy reddish colour to the face", nothing about the complexion of the face, nothing about being white.

Your made up fictional definition isn't gonna fly no matter how many times you spam the same bullshit over, and over again.

The definition is here to stay, so suck it.

rud·dy
ˈrədē/
adjective
adjective: ruddy; comparative adjective: ruddier; superlative adjective: ruddiest
1
.
(of a person's face) having a healthy red color.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Meanwhile, 97% of publishing climate scientists in the entire fucking world are laughing in your face

Every single international science academy, world-fucking-wide accepts ACC

Yeah, it's safe to say my side is winning.

If this was boxing, this would be the match up;



v.

Me You

That's metaphorically an exact representation of the strength of each argument, yet you dummies keep putting money down on "the blue eyed killer" because his marketing team spent hundreds of millions lying about his record. The scientific community is trying to tell you there's no way this kid has 47 1st round knockouts while his agent and coaches are telling you he murdered 13 guys before they ever hit the mat and he's torn guys arms off and all this other shit you seem to fall for hook, line and sinker... As an unbiased spectator, I'll admit, I enjoy watching such destruction inside the ring, but at a certain point it's just sad.. Especially when your wife and family doesn't have any food to eat for the month because you bet this months wages on blue eyes...
It's much closer to this:

You



The vast majority



Keep telling yourself you're winning.
 

killemsoftly

Well-Known Member
That guys just overwhelmed by the stupidity of Fox News. His brain's oxygen starved from an overdose of bigotry and stupidity.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
Then like Bill Nye and the clip in the OP with the Heritage Foundation retard, you and I simply disagree on the facts. You believe your bullshit that goes against what 97% of leading climate scientists believe.

And you're joined by Sheskunk in that your defeatist attitude towards any valid scientific solutions encompass everything selfish about being a human being. Too stupid to know how, too arrogant to know why.
Some facts ...

I never denied climate change.

I do not feel defeated.

I live my life to it's fullest.

I have asked for your advice on what I can do to help.

All you want is to be right.



Things I can do to help ...
plant a garden
plant a tree
cut back on my consumption of fossil fuel
use public transportation
ride my bicycle to work
buy an eco friendly "smart car"
buy locally
avoid buying useless crap
eat less beef




I have agreed with you yet you are in such a rage you cannot see it. It seems your whole "argument" revolves around the fact that you simply want to be "right". You're right, but you offer no solutions. Even with all your education.

Not much more to say.
 

woody333333

Well-Known Member
Some facts ...

I never denied climate change.

I do not feel defeated.

I live my life to it's fullest.

I have asked for your advice on what I can do to help.

All you want is to be right.



Things I can do to help ...
plant a garden
plant a tree
cut back on my consumption of fossil fuel
use public transportation
ride my bicycle to work
buy an eco friendly "smart car"
buy locally
avoid buying useless crap
eat less beef




I have agreed with you yet you are in such a rage you cannot see it. It seems your whole "argument" revolves around the fact that you simply want to be "right". You're right, but you offer no solutions. Even with all your education.

Not much more to say.

unplug your computer.......
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
This subject has become such an emotional issue that way too many people are taking advantage of it. I'd like to see us take a different approach.

What we do now is give government funding for research that will be cut if / when viable solutions are found. The same people who want to increase even more funding are the same people that will tell us that evil drug companies don't look for cures because it would cut into their bottom line. Think of the billions we've spent already that increases exponentially yearly.

How bout this for a solution? If we picked 100 colleges across the country and gave each 10M to find a way to propel a semi from Cal to Fl without fossil fuel or a recharge. The first place prize could be a Billion with monetary prizes for top 5 or 10. This competition can be open to the private sector too. I think competition brings out the best in man (no participation trophies for you "that's not fair" pusses), and money and fame drive people.

My way spurs a solution. The present way, a solution would cut off funding. My cost was 2B+, , present cost is infinite.

Just a suggestion, whatchoo got Pad?
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
This subject has become such an emotional issue that way too many people are taking advantage of it. I'd like to see us take a different approach.

What we do now is give government funding for research that will be cut if / when viable solutions are found. The same people who want to increase even more funding are the same people that will tell us that evil drug companies don't look for cures because it would cut into their bottom line. Think of the billions we've spent already that increases exponentially yearly.

How bout this for a solution? If we picked 100 colleges across the country and gave each 10M to find a way to propel a semi from Cal to Fl without fossil fuel or a recharge. The first place prize could be a Billion with monetary prizes for top 5 or 10. This competition can be open to the private sector too. I think competition brings out the best in man (no participation trophies for you "that's not fair" pusses), and money and fame drive people.

My way spurs a solution. The present way, a solution would cut off funding. My cost was 2B+, , present cost is infinite.

Just a suggestion, whatchoo got Pad?
Holy shit...

Logic?

In an ACC debate?

On a slightly less serious note...

http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/2014/05/08/tip-of-the-iceberg-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg-reveals-science-expedition/
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
Yes, I read his post

The scientific consensus is not "well I guess we can't do anything about it.. so fuck it.."

What's where we disagree

I believe we can do something about it, and it's supremely selfish not to act now

You idiots say "well it doesn't affect me now" and fail to understand the implications of a process that takes longer than you can view in your lifetime. The same reason people like you don't accept the theory of evolution. Basically taking the "I can't see it, I don't believe it!" approach.. Beautiful! Did you ever see that alphabet be created? No? Well then shut the fuck up because you can't speak to me right now in English.
There is absolutely no point in the United states tying one arm behind its back, by doing something now to reduce carbon emissions by half even, if China and India do not agree to play by the same set of rules. There is no way for us to impose anything on china.

The west would need to sign very restrictive trade agreements where we would only trade with each other, and that might not be enough to convince China.

I don't have any kids, I don't give a fuck about the future of yours, I want a good economy to live in. It's gotta be shitty for someone, better your kids that me.
 

killemsoftly

Well-Known Member
There is absolutely no point in the United states tying one arm behind its back, by doing something now to reduce carbon emissions by half even, if China and India do not agree to play by the same set of rules. There is no way for us to impose anything on china.

The west would need to sign very restrictive trade agreements where we would only trade with each other, and that might not be enough to convince China.

I don't have any kids, I don't give a fuck about the future of yours, I want a good economy to live in. It's gotta be shitty for someone, better your kids that me.
China's going crazy damming rivers everywhere they can for hydroelectric. They know they have to phase out coal. They plan on it. No one has to force them. They're planning ahead.
I don't fear the Chinese. this dynasty will disintegrate like all the ones before it.
 
Top