the oregon-idaho border and minimum wage

[UncleBuck]

I said if you make it easier to get shit home, people buy more shit.

that 800 feet is really a killer.

thus spaketh "the one".

 

[Harrekin]

I'll give you a hint, "don't make your customers go to you, go to your customers".

You have no idea about the relevance of the term "Location, Location, Location".

You want your storefront in the area of highest population density.

Yes, and looking at it on the map isn't how they decide where to locate their store.

You think they throw a dart blindfolded at a map?

Or pick a line they think looks pretty on it?

They go where they can extract as much money, as cheaply as possible.

Denying this is like denying gravity, IGNORANCE.

Anyways, you've already made enough of a show of yourself, and I ain't even mad, just frustrated the same way anyone is trying to explain complex ideas to a childlike mind.

B============D ~~~~~~ Bucks wife's back-tits.

 

[Harrekin]

that 800 feet is really a killer.

thus spaketh "the one".

You not realising it is speaks volumes.

"Which store will I go to...? The nearest thats cheaper, or the one further away that has a 6% tax?

Hmmm...?"

Good night, back-tits.

 

[UncleBuck]

Yes, and looking at it on the map isn't how they decide where to locate their store.

location location location.

that extra 800 feet would move them too far away from the population center and make it tougher for people to get stuff back home.

that extra 800 feet would mean 40-50% of their business.

that was your original argument, "the one".

don't cry, that just makes my erection more bulbous and purple.

 

[UncleBuck]

... a 6% tax?

if you had just mentioned that from the beginning, i wouldn't be mocking you so much right now.

if you weren't trying to pretend like that;s what you meant from the start (while never mentioning it), i wouldn't have any ammo either.

but "the one" (that's you!) didn't do that. thus i laugh at your expense.

 

[Harrekin]

if you had just mentioned that from the beginning, i wouldn't be mocking you so much right now.

if you weren't trying to pretend like that;s what you meant from the start (while never mentioning it), i wouldn't have any ammo either.

but "the one" (that's you!) didn't do that. thus i laugh at your expense.

And everyone else is laughing at you.

Notice how not even your lefty friends chimed in to agree with you?

Who marries someone with more rolls than a French bread factory...??

 

[UncleBuck]

And everyone else is laughing at you.

you've got desertdude and nutes&nugs agreeing with you.

L.O.L.

 

[Harrekin]

you've got desertdude and nutes&nugs agreeing with you.

L.O.L.

Dont you gladly point out that theyre greedy Republicans?

Doesnt that make them more of an authority on how Corporations operate than some ignorant mudscuttle leftie who dries his weed over cat shit?

Again, even a stopped clock is correct twice a day and you cant even be correct once...

L.O.L.

Guess what Bucky, I can make more money than you, legally, in less time and for far less effort.

Stick that in your catshit pipe and smoke it.

 

[WORDZofWORDZCRAFT]

im pretty sure if they moved the walmart 800 ft to the east all the bread would get soggy.

 

[spandy]

grand opening october 30th, 2013.

That would be incorrect.

I found articles on an Ontario California Walmart Grand opening Oct 30th 2013, but the best I can tell is that the Walmart in Ontario Oregon was built decades ago, and must have been upgraded at some point to a super center.

 

[spandy]

im pretty sure if they moved the walmart 800 ft to the east all the bread would get soggy.

Everything would cost 6% more, because you'd now be in Idaho, paying sales tax.

And all the Oregon welfare recipients would be shopping elsewhere cause Oregon welfare no good in Idaho, and that community has a shit load of them.

 

[desert dude]

so you are "the one", yet made post after post after post trying to argue that they didn't set up in idaho, 800 feet away, because it wasn't close enough to the population center?

"they did a cost/benefit analysis!" - sparkling insight there, cue ball. dropping those gems of drunken irish wisdom.

the point of this thread is that the job creators are the ones spending money, people like you and me who drive aggregate demand.

secondary to this point is that significantly higher minimum wage is no impediment to job creation at all.

feel free to argue those points if you'd like, or you can just continue to bless us with your fine wisdom, "the one".

Dumber all the time. Switzerland disagrees with you. Economics contradicts your foolish assertion. Common sense is uncommon on the left.

 

[UncleBuck]

Dumber all the time. Switzerland disagrees with you. Economics contradicts your foolish assertion. Common sense is uncommon on the left.

so if significantly higher minimum wage is an impediment to job creation, as you claim, then why is australia's minimum wage double yet their unemployment rate is around 5-6% right now?

if minimum wage is an impediment to job creation, then why did walmart choose to set up in oregon instead of 800 feet in idaho, where min wage is almost $2 an hour less?

your rebuttal of "nuh uh! BULLSHIT!" is lacking.

 

[UncleBuck]

Dont you gladly point out that theyre greedy Republicans?

Doesnt that make them more of an authority on how Corporations operate than some ignorant mudscuttle leftie who dries his weed over cat shit?

Again, even a stopped clock is correct twice a day and you cant even be correct once...

L.O.L.

Guess what Bucky, I can make more money than you, legally, in less time and for far less effort.

Stick that in your catshit pipe and smoke it.

oh, you think republicans are actually smarter at something rather than just more willing to rebleat the dogma. there's your problem right there.

 

[desert dude]

so if significantly higher minimum wage is an impediment to job creation, as you claim, then why is australia's minimum wage double yet their unemployment rate is around 5-6% right now?

if minimum wage is an impediment to job creation, then why did walmart choose to set up in oregon instead of 800 feet in idaho, where min wage is almost $2 an hour less?

your rebuttal of "nuh uh! BULLSHIT!" is lacking.

 

[UncleBuck]

good job on answering nothing whatsoever.

you are a credit to your superior race, mein fuhrer.

 

[desert dude]

good job on answering nothing whatsoever.

you are a credit to your superior race, mein fuhrer.

http://quizlet.com/4855140/economics-unit-3-supply-and-demand-review-flash-cards/

 

[desert dude]

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand

Supply and demand is a model of microeconomics. It describes how a price is formed in a market economy. There are two determining factors on such a market, the number of things made available, called supply, and the number of things consumers want, called demand. Supply and demand shows how producers and consumers interact with each other. This relationship will fix the price for a certain type of good. In Perfect competition, the quantity demanded (demand) and the quantity supplied will be equal. This will fix the price. There will be economic equilibrium.


For normal goods, and a normal market, there are four basic laws that determine the change in the market, if either supply or demand changes:

• If the demand increases, and the supply remains the same, there will be a shortage. This will mean the price will increase.
• If the demand decreases, and the supply remains the same, there will be a surplus. This will mean the price will go down.
• If the supply increases, and the demand remains the same, there will be a surplus, and the price will go down.
• If the supply decreases, and the demand remains the same, there will be a shortage, and the price will increase.

 

[UncleBuck]

http://quizlet.com/4855140/economics-unit-3-supply-and-demand-review-flash-cards/

if minimum wage is an impediment to job creation, why is australia not swimming in unemployment with their $15 an hour minimum wage?

 

[desert dude]

Law of Demand


As we can see on the demand graph, there is an inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded. Economists call this the Law of Demand. If the price goes up, the quantity demanded goes down (but demand itself stays the same). If the price decreases, quantity demanded increases. This is the Law of Demand. On a graph, an inverse relationship is represented by a downward sloping line from left to right.