oddish
Well-Known Member
Have you been following the rules at all? No offense, but they've changed them a handful of times already. Amendments, adjustments and changing the way they enforce wording.
MMPR Grow op: Small Scale
- Thread starter maximum
- Start date
Princess of Pot
Well-Known Member
I have been keeping an eye on the amendments and I have also been speaking with a lawyer. From what I understand, rejecting your application bc they have changed the rules of the game after you have applied is not really allowed. whether or not rejected applicants will be hiring legal council to sue for damages in another thing.
Princess of Pot
Well-Known Member
Can you post your letter or at least the part of the letter that requests the 500m radius from a house?
WHATFG
Well-Known Member
And somehow you think they care about lawsuits? Look at their track record. They are making it up on the fly.
rnr "
I got some news for ya RDR
We're gonna kick HC's ass right back to where they thought up this BS deal in the first place. Things will stay the same as they are now until HC can think up something that will work for the patient. They won't. They don't care remember?
To much money to worry about the 'little things'.
They'll let the wee ones slide. Mark my words
rdr rnr funny
You think? lol
I got some news for ya RDR
We're gonna kick HC's ass right back to where they thought up this BS deal in the first place. Things will stay the same as they are now until HC can think up something that will work for the patient. They won't. They don't care remember?
To much money to worry about the 'little things'.
They'll let the wee ones slide. Mark my words
rdr rnr funny
Devil Lettuce
Well-Known Member
It may or may not be going the way HC wants it to, but HC does not control the courts or what they will rule in Feb.
oddish
Well-Known Member
I agree with this and I believe in our courts system. That said, I've seen some glimmers of actual intelligence coming from HC and it scares me to think they might actually be in control of the situation.
CannaReview
Well-Known Member
I think the next set of court session will be some cool history making. At this time I can't see a judge not slapping HC silly with all the Kelowna stuff and the crap that has been sold as "medicine" so far. Also when it comes to real charter of rights issues the courts always seem to side with the citizen right vs the government.
leaffan
Well-Known Member
True, but they sure as hell know how to manipulate the system.
Princess of Pot
Well-Known Member
I don't think they do care - I just think that there will be a way to get damages when this whole system falls apart
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
I agree totally. From what I've seen there are some pretty good arguments that it worked better for the patients the other way. I'm not gonna point out all the examples but we have all seen them described here. I think HC has a lot to answer too...like these very high prices. That's what a lot of this was about. and the LP's are bolstering that argument very well. I'd say they proved the argument already with just prices alone. What are they ever gonna drop below 5 bucks a gram...doubt it? They won't make any money then. And as they say they are there to make money. You see the two points of view oppose each other and PRICE will a big consideration.
It's a bloody juxtaposition !!
ya of course what they are doing is semy wrong by changing the rules.
you wont hear anything about the new rules as in 500 m from a house. if they have it in there books, then it don't matter, and there is already people suing for these reasons! do you really think they will win or it wont take years and a lot of $$$?
regulations can be changed anytime to suite the system.
this has been made to fail. they don't want this to happen and they don't want a boat load of work to do babysitting and new rules and bs.
we might see anymore lp for a year, then they might allow other larger ones.
the 20k ruling is similar, they don't have a rule, they have a # to go by, if your under it gives them cause to put u in the shit pile. or over 20ksqft is the $$ pile. a few large sites is all we will prob see until harpers out.
if JT gets in, buddy says 4yrs min before its actually up and running for legalization. then pc could be voted back in, then what????
Then what ?
lol
by then the government will learn not to fux with sick people who have legit arguments to back themselves up and show the courts just how HC could care less about patients.
They care about Money. lol and is why they will leave patients alone, they're just to much of a pain in their assets lol Tee hee
lol
by then the government will learn not to fux with sick people who have legit arguments to back themselves up and show the courts just how HC could care less about patients.
They care about Money. lol and is why they will leave patients alone, they're just to much of a pain in their assets lol Tee hee
They didn't state that it had to be 500m from a house, just that we needed to include a aerial photo that shows a 500m radius around the site. This was on a blue checklist that they sent back with our application. What is interesting is that we did not receive such a checklist showing the deficiencies on our first submission (Back in August), they just asked for the missing information (or to elaborate on anything). They also told me that I needed to include sample record forms, even though it explicitly states on the application that this is optional. Perhaps what was most interesting was that some sections of my application that had made it through the review phase the first time were on the check list as needing to be completed (I suspect that this was a formatting issue, but they have obviously changed the process).
Anyway, after receiving the checklist stating that I needed to include the image with the 500 m radius, I sent an e-mail basically asking what this is used for and if there is anything I should know about it before resubmitting and this is what they said:
"Thank you for your interest in becoming a licensed producer under the Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations (MMPR).
The information provided within the application such as the recent aerial view of the proposed site showing adjacent lots within a radius of 500 meters from your proposed site; the building location survey prepared and certified by a qualified surveyor and the legal zoning of the proposed site and adjacent lots are all taken into consideration when assessing the risk of the proposed site."
The "prepared and certified" part has me a little concerned as well...