Yes or no ? Freedom or slavery ?

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Nope, not OK at all. People shouldn't do it, but I would bet that thousands (millions?) do every day safely. How about prescription drugs? Should we be allowed to drive on our daily dose of government approved intoxication?
You can't drive on ANY medication that may have you impaired..all ready a law
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
You can't drive on ANY medication that may have you impaired..all ready a law
If you say so...

You think a cop can tell that the 50 year old grandma is on anti-depressants that has her lethargic and in a general don't give a shit mood? Or are we just going by your definition of impaired?

Would you be for road side drug testing?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
If I leave you alone to live in peace, should I be left alone too ? Can you provide an example of where this isn't a good policy?

London Fog....I hear crickets....chirp chirp chirp....but I DON'T hear your answer....scared?
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
question was answered...sorry if you did not like the answer. Why do you think the world we be better with NO regulations
Was just wondering why you never answered whether or not I can marry my brother and can both of us marry the same person? Why do you want to regulate some marriages but not others? Seems like some conservatives I know.
 

Antidisestablishmentarian

Well-Known Member
Do you have an example of this
Just one? Ok.

"It seems to me it was a series of people taking shortcuts that accumulated on this particular day into what could have been much more catastrophic," said safety board member Kitty Higgins.

This article also has this:

Last August, FAA said it would fine American $7.1 million for continuing to fly airliners after safety problems were reported and for drug-testing violations. FAA said the Texas-based airline delayed repairs on two MD-80s -- a mid-sized airliner -- after problems were reported with their autopilot systems and flew them 58 times in violations of federal regulations. The airline is negotiating the fine with the agency.


http://blog.cleveland.com/business/2009/04/american_airlines_faulted_in_m.html
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
so you want to be able to marry your bother and then marry someone else ???
Not me personally, just like I personally wouldn't marry another man. I just don't feel I have the right to tell others who they can and can't marry. You do and I am wondering how you rectify this?

If two brothers wanted to marry each other as well as 20 women who all consent, I don't get why it's anyone's business.

Try to convince me using different arguments than those who are against gay marriage, should be fun.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Just one? Ok.

"It seems to me it was a series of people taking shortcuts that accumulated on this particular day into what could have been much more catastrophic," said safety board member Kitty Higgins.

This article also has this:

Last August, FAA said it would fine American $7.1 million for continuing to fly airliners after safety problems were reported and for drug-testing violations. FAA said the Texas-based airline delayed repairs on two MD-80s -- a mid-sized airliner -- after problems were reported with their autopilot systems and flew them 58 times in violations of federal regulations. The airline is negotiating the fine with the agency.


http://blog.cleveland.com/business/2009/04/american_airlines_faulted_in_m.html
I'm sorry I thought you were speaking of companies that actually were doing this and getting away with it. Now imagine what they would do if with ZERO penalties
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Not me personally, just like I personally wouldn't marry another man. I just don't feel I have the right to tell others who they can and can't marry. You do and I am wondering how you rectify this?
I would fight for you to marry your brother ( let me know when you two set the date ). I would be against you marring your sister due to the risk of birth defects because you share many of the same recessive traits that can cause problems. So yes to your bro and congratulations. No to your sister. No retarded kids if that can be avoided.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
I would fight for you to marry your brother ( let me know when you two set the date ). I would be against you marring your sister due to the risk of birth defects because you share many of the same recessive traits that can cause problems. So yes to your bro and congratulations. No to your sister. No retarded kids if that can be avoided.
So you feel it's OK to regulate SOME marriages between consenting adults but not others....

Are you coming around yet?

Oh, my brother says thanks, my sister says what's up? we can adopt.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
So you feel it's OK to regulate SOME marriages but not others....

Are you coming around yet?
I feel some regulations are needed. What is so hard to understand about that. I don't think a man should be able to marry a female dog either..no matter how much the dog loves the man
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
So you feel it's OK to regulate SOME marriages between consenting adults but not others....

Are you coming around yet?

Oh, my brother says thanks, my sister says what's up? we can adopt.
You and your sister would be fucking and that would mean you two could have a baby
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
I feel some regulations are needed. What is so hard to understand about that. I don't think a man should be able to marry a female dog either..no matter how much the dog loves the man
Well sure, that dog is not a consenting adult. That's a cop out answer.

Why do you feel you can regulate some marriages between consenting adults and not others? Why do you get to decide which ones are cool but when others like Clinton did it, you get mad?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Well sure, that dog is not a consenting adult. That's a cop out answer.

Why do you feel you can regulate some marriages between consenting adults and not others? Why do you get to decide which ones are cool but when others like Clinton did it, you get mad?
You are asking a question that has already been answered. If the marriage has the chance of producing offspring with birth defects due to sharing many of the same recessive traits...then NO. Your brother I'm not against ( creepy but go for it ). You sister..I'm against, reason already given
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
You and your sister would be fucking and that would mean you two could have a baby
What if she's on the pill? What if she's past menopause? What if we had healthy babies? What if we are both financially secure and can take of a little bucktard? What if we wanted to marry but decided it was open and we wouldn't do each other?

Again, why do you feel you get to regulate marriage, but when others do it you get angry?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
What if she's on the pill? What if she's past menopause? What if we had healthy babies? What if we are both financially secure and can take of a little bucktard? What if we wanted to marry but decided it was open and we wouldn't do each other?

Again, why do you feel you get to regulate marriage, but when others do it you get angry?
What if you both die and leave a little retarded baby for society to take care of ? Is it fair to the child to be born retarded when it could have been avoid all together ? Why do you think it's right to marry your mother or your sister. Is this a right you are willing to fight for
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
What if you both die and leave a little retarded baby for society to take care of ? Is it fair to the child to be born retarded when it could have been avoid all together ? Why do you think it's right to marry your mother or your sister. Is this a right you are willing to fight for
Retards have a right to live too. Should all parents of disabled kids be locked up for birthing them? Should the kids be put down for "the greater good"?

Why do you feel you have to the right to decide who can and can't marry but get mad when others do it? Are you going to answer this or should I quit asking?

Do you believe the number of incest babies would skyrocket without a law against it? Or did you really mean it when you said prohibition doesn't work?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
What if you both die and leave a little retarded baby for society to take care of ? Is it fair to the child to be born retarded when it could have been avoid all together ? Why do you think it's right to marry your mother or your sister. Is this a right you are willing to fight for
This is the dumbest fucking logic ever presented for evidence of your opinion.
 
Top