What does everyone think of this supposed Sandy Hook conspiracy?

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ive yet to find any evidence that actually proves anyone died... so w/e... with that said... idk why kids that shoot up schools do so... id say its more social related and psychological than actually a gun epidemic
You may aswell specifically say American children, cos I don't see many headlines for school shootings anywhere else...
 

DrRonPaul2012

Well-Known Member
Are you seriously a Ron Paul fan? Or a clever disguise of a sock? RP fans wouldn't ordinarily believe the Sandy Hook thing was a farce, seems incredulous.
yeah, but your right I don't fit into any general group... except being a stoner... but thats about it
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
And it was not a conspiracy.

The only coverup is how incompetent our government was in discovering and preventing the terrorist attack.
 

DrRonPaul2012

Well-Known Member
And it was not a conspiracy.

The only coverup is how incompetent our government was in discovering and preventing the terrorist attack.
ive heard FBI reports that paint a different tale... they were aware of there presence in the country but they were being moved before the fbi could actaully arrest them, which makes no sense until you understand the mossads role in the whole thing... but here i am wasting my time explaining something you don't care about

but jsut for shit and giggles i'll try to dig up the video the FBI agent interviews in

*edit* couldn't find it... so damn, which even tho it was a great interview im still surprised i can't find it because i could have sworn it was a corporate media interview...but idk. proof is everything
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ive heard FBI reports that paint a different tale... they were aware of there presence in the country but they were being moved before the fbi could actaully arrest them, which makes no sense until you understand the mossads role in the whole thing... but here i am wasting my time explaining something you don't care about

but jsut for shit and giggles i'll try to dig up the video the FBI agent interviews in

*edit* couldn't find it... so damn, which even tho it was a great interview im still surprised i can't find it because i could have sworn it was a corporate media interview...but idk. proof is everything
so you're saying israel did it?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
And it was not a conspiracy.

The only coverup is how incompetent our government was in discovering and preventing the terrorist attack.
It was a complete setup. Not conspiracy theory, conspiracy fact. There is no way the government, the military, and civilian security state was overcome by some backwards men with box cutters.

Temperatures from neither jet fuel nor office furniture can soften structural steel enough to make a collapse within 45 minutes. Building 7 my friend, building 7.
 

DrRonPaul2012

Well-Known Member
It was a complete setup. Not conspiracy theory, conspiracy fact. There is no way the government, the military, and civilian security state was overcome by some backwards men with box cutters.

Temperatures from neither jet fuel nor office furniture can soften structural steel enough to make a collapse within 45 minutes. Building 7 my friend, building 7.
even the towers were designed to be hit with fully loaded 737s... a 747 isn't THAT much different... even the empire state building was hit by a USAF bomber and didn't fall

and more importantly First responders HEARD and reported 'secondary and tertiary explosions'... i believe them more than our gov't officials or any other politicians
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
even the towers were designed to be hit with fully loaded 737s... a 747 isn't THAT much different... even the empire state building was hit by a USAF bomber

even First responders HEARD and reported 'secondary and tertiary explosions'... i believe them more than our gov't offical or any other politician
You know, the 2 towers almost, almost could be believable in a way, but not building 7, not by a long shot.
All of the unexplained anomalies.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
aww fuck.

more Troofer Bullshit.

the CIA NSA and FBI failed.

the NORAD response was also a failure, but one which can be understood, since 4 fucking planes were hijacked simultaneously, and nobody expected the hijackers to crash them into buildings.

the towers came down because they were not designed to take a direct strike at full throttle from 747's.

throwing a bullet at you has far less impact than shooting it at you from a gun.

and if that bullet weighed several tonnes, was full of kerosene, and hit a building full of combustible materials and power transformers the results would be spectacular.

youre right "jet fuel" (kerosene) doesnt burn hot enough in open air to melt steel.

but it wasnt burning in open air.

the building itself acted as a kiln, concentrating and amplifying the heat until the building failed.
coal also doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel, until you contain it in a forge

building 7 didnt fall "from fire alone" nor was it demolished by explosives. it fell because it was lit on fire by tonnes of flaming rubble falling from 1000 feet up which smashed the walls, broke the supports and lit shit on fire.

the "secondary explosions" were goddamned POWER TRANSFORMERS blowing out, which makes a loud ass boom and causes more fire.

accept it.

some primitive morons with a death wish jacked some planes, those who were supposed to protect us failed, the buildings couldnt take the damage they sustained, because buildings are not invulnerable monuments to human greatness, and now some people need a comforting story so they can sleep at night.
you are NOT safe.
nothing is perfect.
eventually everything falls apart
and eventually you, and everyone you know will be dead.

life's rough.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
aww fuck.

more Troofer Bullshit.

the CIA NSA and FBI failed.

the NORAD response was also a failure, but one which can be understood, since 4 fucking planes were hijacked simultaneously, and nobody expected the hijackers to crash them into buildings.

the towers came down because they were not designed to take a direct strike at full throttle from 747's.

throwing a bullet at you has far less impact than shooting it at you from a gun.

and if that bullet weighed several tonnes, was full of kerosene, and hit a building full of combustible materials and power transformers the results would be spectacular.

youre right "jet fuel" (kerosene) doesnt burn hot enough in open air to melt steel.

but it wasnt burning in open air.

the building itself acted as a kiln, concentrating and amplifying the heat until the building failed.
coal also doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel, until you contain it in a forge

building 7 didnt fall "from fire alone" nor was it demolished by explosives. it fell because it was lit on fire by tonnes of flaming rubble falling from 1000 feet up which smashed the walls, broke the supports and lit shit on fire.

the "secondary explosions" were goddamned POWER TRANSFORMERS blowing out, which makes a loud ass boom and causes more fire.

accept it.

some primitive morons with a death wish jacked some planes, those who were supposed to protect us failed, the buildings couldnt take the damage they sustained, because buildings are not invulnerable monuments to human greatness, and now some people need a comforting story so they can sleep at night.
you are NOT safe.
nothing is perfect.
eventually everything falls apart
and eventually you, and everyone you know will be dead.

life's rough.
Yeasssss....


Swallow that Bush pecker.

Get drunk on his retard spunk.
 

DrRonPaul2012

Well-Known Member
aww fuck.

more Troofer Bullshit.

the CIA NSA and FBI failed.

the NORAD response was also a failure, but one which can be understood, since 4 fucking planes were hijacked simultaneously, and nobody expected the hijackers to crash them into buildings.

the towers came down because they were not designed to take a direct strike at full throttle from 747's.

throwing a bullet at you has far less impact than shooting it at you from a gun.

and if that bullet weighed several tonnes, was full of kerosene, and hit a building full of combustible materials and power transformers the results would be spectacular.

youre right "jet fuel" (kerosene) doesnt burn hot enough in open air to melt steel.

but it wasnt burning in open air.

the building itself acted as a kiln, concentrating and amplifying the heat until the building failed.
coal also doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel, until you contain it in a forge

building 7 didnt fall "from fire alone" nor was it demolished by explosives. it fell because it was lit on fire by tonnes of flaming rubble falling from 1000 feet up which smashed the walls, broke the supports and lit shit on fire.

the "secondary explosions" were goddamned POWER TRANSFORMERS blowing out, which makes a loud ass boom and causes more fire.

accept it.

some primitive morons with a death wish jacked some planes, those who were supposed to protect us failed, the buildings couldnt take the damage they sustained, because buildings are not invulnerable monuments to human greatness, and now some people need a comforting story so they can sleep at night.
you are NOT safe.
nothing is perfect.
eventually everything falls apart
and eventually you, and everyone you know will be dead.

life's rough.
http://zankrank.com/Ranqings/Default.aspx?currentRanqing=yo mama's so statist jokes

STATIST ALERT.... LMFAO because the gov't has never lied... dude your not even worth a real response.... **ignored**
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member

DrRonPaul2012

Well-Known Member
aww fuck.

more Troofer Bullshit.

the CIA NSA and FBI failed.

the NORAD response was also a failure, but one which can be understood, since 4 fucking planes were hijacked simultaneously, and nobody expected the hijackers to crash them into buildings.

the towers came down because they were not designed to take a direct strike at full throttle from 747's.

throwing a bullet at you has far less impact than shooting it at you from a gun.

and if that bullet weighed several tonnes, was full of kerosene, and hit a building full of combustible materials and power transformers the results would be spectacular.

youre right "jet fuel" (kerosene) doesnt burn hot enough in open air to melt steel.

but it wasnt burning in open air.

the building itself acted as a kiln, concentrating and amplifying the heat until the building failed.
coal also doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel, until you contain it in a forge

building 7 didnt fall "from fire alone" nor was it demolished by explosives. it fell because it was lit on fire by tonnes of flaming rubble falling from 1000 feet up which smashed the walls, broke the supports and lit shit on fire.

the "secondary explosions" were goddamned POWER TRANSFORMERS blowing out, which makes a loud ass boom and causes more fire.

accept it.

some primitive morons with a death wish jacked some planes, those who were supposed to protect us failed, the buildings couldnt take the damage they sustained, because buildings are not invulnerable monuments to human greatness, and now some people need a comforting story so they can sleep at night.
you are NOT safe.
nothing is perfect.
eventually everything falls apart
and eventually you, and everyone you know will be dead.

life's rough.

WTC 7 'PULLED' the building...smh
 

DrRonPaul2012

Well-Known Member
Oh man don't ignore Kynes. One of the best writers by far on this site. You don't have to agree with him to appreciate the flowery prose.

I happen to agree with him more than not though, so you can take my opinion as that.
dude ive been watching his posts... if you agree with him so much that probably makes you a statist too... smh... are you a veteran? (most veterans are very obedient to the state) then obviously your going to agree with mr.foxnews_watcher#1 (or if you only watch mainstream corporate news and believe that to be the reality we live in)
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
dude ive been watching his posts... if you agree with him so much that probably makes you a statist too... smh... your a veteran? obviously then your going to agree with mr.foxnews_watcher#1
Nah, that's usually where we part views. I'm sure he thinks my libertarian views are crazy train too, but we find common ground.

We are similar in our economic understanding that you can't borrow your way out of debt and the keynesian measures have a bad grade.

He's also mo better versed in history than I am.

I also used to really enjoy conversing with a man named canndo here. Wish he'd come back. All of the cannas are missed here. He and I were almost polar opposites but there was no way I would ever put him on ignore because of it.

There are many here that I am in agreement with more than not, but there are none here that I agree with on everything.
 
Top