unclebuck

looks like you got it dead right!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/08/republicans-abortion_n_6438522.html?1420753570

Republicans Introduce Five Anti-Abortion Bills In First Days Of New Congress



because freedom!


Buck.

I think the republicans are just trying to save some future democratic voters, and you should be supportive for it. If it were me I would help every democrat I could to relieve them of there problem, like free 24/7 abortion clinic in every city above 10,000. And a law that gave full fucking funding all the time.
 
Are you addressing me as gangbanger? or finishing your statement of yourself with the word gangbanger?what's wrong with you?
I run solo bro
no hood
 
It is plain Engish you have trouble with? Sound it out. Pronounce each word correctly.

My IQ? Oh my! You think no-snitching is some code of bandits or something. I am for Order.

And apparently you have some challenges with IQ I can't make heads or tails of this bro
 
It is plain Engish you have trouble with? Sound it out. Pronounce each word correctly.

My IQ? Oh my! You think no-snitching is some code of bandits or something. I am for Order.
So you were tardedly addressing me not describing yourself
 
And you know what, you are such a buzz kill you didn't even get the joke.
No I got the part of the "joke" like you know you think it's really funny that you're pointing out the fact that he made the thread about himself...

...so you think you're clever ...


...:) ok?!?!
 
You must be really young Because I can remember a time when marijuana itself growing it, consuming it was a criminal act what was the silly phrase you used "banditry"
 
Summoning them buzzkill ass mods places

what a stupid joke to summon a mod somewhere

That's like being at a party and trying to show off yer party joke like
"Check it out guys I'm going to call the cops"
 
Last edited:
An abortion performed for any whimsical reason imaginable, or no reason whatever, i.e. "just because I want one".

The OP trotted out a Republican proposal to ban abortion beyond 20 weeks gestation and claimed that was a limit on women's freedom. I admit that I don't know the details of the proposed legislation but I support a ban on elective abortions past 20 weeks gestation. If government has any useful purpose it must be to protect the least among us from harm. There is none among us more vulnerable than a baby, and none more deserving of protection.

Read that paragraph again... E L E C T I V E abortions.


Setting aside the specifics of the legislation, the fact that the Republican party can't get beyond this issue provides fodder for the Dems.

Libertarians got it right; keep this a personal choice and the government out. It makes no sense to argue against government funding for like choices and then claim government regulation is appropriate.

One would hope, adults are capable of thoughtful decisions but we know full well that idiots abound; allowing them to exist is the price of freedom.
 
Setting aside the specifics of the legislation, the fact that the Republican party can't get beyond this issue provides fodder for the Dems.

Libertarians got it right; keep this a personal choice and the government out. It makes no sense to argue against government funding for like choices and then claim government regulation is appropriate.

One would hope, adults are capable of thoughtful decisions but we know full well that idiots abound; allowing them to exist is the price of freedom.

Libertarians are as divided on the issue of abortion as everybody else. At some point a developing fetus is a person and deserves the protection of the law: there is no right to a personal choice to murder somebody. I doubt you will find a single libertarian who believes murdering another person is simply a personal choice, such a position is contrary to the non-aggression principle.

I am a libertarian and I support elective abortion up to a point. Twenty weeks gestation is somewhat arbitrary but it seems a reasonable arbitrary point. Personally, I would prefer 16 weeks or even 12 weeks to be the limit; again just an arbitrary point. Four and half months is plenty of time for a woman to get an abortion if she wants one.

Some on RIU, all self-admitted progressives, argue that elective abortion at any point is totally fine. I enjoy drawing them out on this point and coaxing them to just say they are completely fine with killing a baby at 40 weeks as long as that baby is still in the womb, to display their ghoulishness for all to see. Some self-admitted progressives, Sky for example, have expressed abhorrence at the notion of elective abortion beyond 20 weeks.

A majority of Americans support abortion limits beyond 20 weeks. I am one of those Americans.
 
Last edited:
Libertarians are as divided on the issue of abortion as everybody else. At some point a developing fetus is a person and deserves the protection of the law: there is no right to a personal choice to murder somebody. I doubt you will find a single libertarian who believes murdering another person is simply a personal choice, such a position is contrary to the non-aggression principle.

I am a libertarian and I support elective abortion up to a point. Twenty weeks gestation is somewhat arbitrary but it seems a reasonable arbitrary point. Personally, I would prefer 16 weeks or even 12 weeks to be the limit; again just an arbitrary point. Four and half months is plenty of time for a woman to get an abortion if she wants one.

Some on RIU, all self-admitted progressives, argue that elective abortion at any point is totally fine. I enjoy drawing them out on this point and coaxing them to just say they are completely fine with killing a baby at 40 weeks as long as that baby is still in the womb, to display their ghoulishness for all to see. Some self-admitted progressives, Sky for example, have expressed abhorrence at the notion of elective abortion beyond 20 weeks.

A majority of Americans support abortion limits beyond 20 weeks. I am one of those Americans.


Well now you're getting into this squishy ground of defining "person hood".

And then there's the question of "whose rights trumps whose"; the incubator or the parasite ... and on it goes.

I prefer to stick with the stated Libertarian position.
 
Libertarians are as divided on the issue of abortion as everybody else. At some point a developing fetus is a person and deserves the protection of the law: there is no right to a personal choice to murder somebody. I doubt you will find a single libertarian who believes murdering another person is simply a personal choice, such a position is contrary to the non-aggression principle.

I am a libertarian and I support elective abortion up to a point. Twenty weeks gestation is somewhat arbitrary but it seems a reasonable arbitrary point. Personally, I would prefer 16 weeks or even 12 weeks to be the limit; again just an arbitrary point. Four and half months is plenty of time for a woman to get an abortion if she wants one.

Some on RIU, all self-admitted progressives, argue that elective abortion at any point is totally fine. I enjoy drawing them out on this point and coaxing them to just say they are completely fine with killing a baby at 40 weeks as long as that baby is still in the womb, to display their ghoulishness for all to see. Some self-admitted progressives, Sky for example, have expressed abhorrence at the notion of elective abortion beyond 20 weeks.

A majority of Americans support abortion limits beyond 20 weeks. I am one of those Americans.
You ARE NOT a libertarian
 
Back
Top