Are there any LP's worth trying, or are they all total crap?

I think I recall seeing some pictures that looked tumbled or sifted. Do you guys think that's what is going on?
I don't know how you can really tell from a pic...maybe some weed is, maybe some isn't.
No way to tell unless your one did this to it. They usually do it after they lace it with more expensive products LOL
Any weed I've gotten from LCS looked NOT stripped to me. I'd say from direct observational and smoking experience with them the answer is NO. But I have no real clue to what goes on anywhere else.
Anyone who would do this to a product and then sell it pure scum imo
 
I don't know how you can really tell from a pic...maybe some weed is, maybe some isn't.
No way to tell unless your one did this to it. They usually do it after they lace it with more expensive products LOL
Any weed I've gotten from LCS looked NOT stripped to me. I'd say from direct observational and smoking experience with them the answer is NO. But I have no real clue to what goes on anywhere else.
Anyone who would do this to a product and then sell it pure scum imo
Hippy, I'm not trying to pick a fight or say that LP weed is good. I am simply saying that the London product in Yessica's photos clearly shows that the glandular heads of the trichomes are missing. I am not implying in any way that someone did something wrong. I am not insulting any club or group. I am simply saying that some problem has either produced cannabis with no glandular trichome heads or some process has removed them.

You seem so intent on supporting this particular club that you appear to not be able to actually look at the picture. Are you sure you don't work for them?
 
Hippy, I'm not trying to pick a fight or say that LP weed is good. I am simply saying that the London product in Yessica's photos clearly shows that the glandular heads of the trichomes are missing. I am not implying in any way that someone did something wrong. I am not insulting any club or group. I am simply saying that some problem has either produced cannabis with no glandular trichome heads or some process has removed them.

You seem so intent on supporting this particular club that you appear to not be able to actually look at the picture. Are you sure you don't work for them?
I was showing the Til Swhag actually. Not Yessicas.
he's not supporting them so much as he is stating that they have a supply...and don't run out...and they have a set price...they dont hold you over a couch ...unlike LP's
 
I was showing the Til Swhag actually. Not Yessicas.
he's not supporting them so much as he is stating that they have a supply...and don't run out...and they have a set price...they dont hold you over a couch ...unlike LP's
Thanks gb, the Hippy is talking about the difference between ccs and lps. I was referring to the stuff that Yessica posted, not the pic you posted, although it also shows a lack of trichome heads. I agree with you that that is what the Hippy is saying, but that has nothing to do with the point that the weed in Yessica's pics has no trichome heads.
 
Hippy, I'm not trying to pick a fight or say that LP weed is good. I am simply saying that the London product in Yessica's photos clearly shows that the glandular heads of the trichomes are missing. I am not implying in any way that someone did something wrong. I am not insulting any club or group. I am simply saying that some problem has either produced cannabis with no glandular trichome heads or some process has removed them.

You seem so intent on supporting this particular club that you appear to not be able to actually look at the picture. Are you sure you don't work for them?
Oh God no. I work for me, I have no job. Now they are nice folks from what I know of them I can say. They are the closest LP to me So I occasionally go there 3 or 4 time a year.
Pics of weed are like buying a car from photo's....impossible to tell the real story. But in this case I've had that product and she's all good. Join, buy....then see Marie. Buy the Blueberry 93...not super potent but very nice all the same. As I have said they have some strains I would not repeat on. I wish I was in Vancouver with the choice to shop all those store fronts....sounds like fun. But I have a low income and can afford much. Producing your own is the best way to go. Patients should be able to shop all avenues of access. LP's, CC's, BM, DG or your own. And not be limited or corralled into any one method.
Also realize that ALL MJ loose trichs the minute it is handle. The loss is negligible. In this case I speak of all weed. LP, Home Grown Bm or CC. not necessarily nefarious activities...just physics. Folks who worry about the natural loos of a few trichs need a real life and something more important to worry about. It all evens out.
 
Thanks gb, the Hippy is talking about the difference between ccs and lps. I was referring to the stuff that Yessica posted, not the pic you posted, although it also shows a lack of trichome heads. I agree with you that that is what the Hippy is saying, but that has nothing to do with the point that the weed in Yessica's pics has no trichome heads.
If you flatten out or compress weed it looks like that, but the heads are still there...stop lookin at the pics only. You being a nurse, you wouldn't diagnose a patient from a photo alone would you. I have said this about LP weed too, a pic isn't the only story.
Nurse you need to come hang out with me and I'll educate you. First we smoke, then there will be no lies between us. You might even like me. I'm a lot of fun.
You need a LOT more exposure to weed. and after a weekend with " The Hippy " the light will shine. I'll show you some amazing un-fucked with bud. None of this commercial CC or LP weed. I'm talking the kind that doesn't get into the hands of most folks......connoisseur Honey. You like to drive fast ? Do you like oil ? We'll have a blast. Where do you live ?
 
Back
Top