You are correct gb the heads have been blasted off the trichome stalks.Oh Mary, it surely has trichomes but
,,,,,,,,,,,,, there is definitely, no head!
I think that's delta 9 shwag that was posted by????
I don't know how you can really tell from a pic...maybe some weed is, maybe some isn't.I think I recall seeing some pictures that looked tumbled or sifted. Do you guys think that's what is going on?
Hippy, I'm not trying to pick a fight or say that LP weed is good. I am simply saying that the London product in Yessica's photos clearly shows that the glandular heads of the trichomes are missing. I am not implying in any way that someone did something wrong. I am not insulting any club or group. I am simply saying that some problem has either produced cannabis with no glandular trichome heads or some process has removed them.I don't know how you can really tell from a pic...maybe some weed is, maybe some isn't.
No way to tell unless your one did this to it. They usually do it after they lace it with more expensive products LOL
Any weed I've gotten from LCS looked NOT stripped to me. I'd say from direct observational and smoking experience with them the answer is NO. But I have no real clue to what goes on anywhere else.
Anyone who would do this to a product and then sell it pure scum imo
I was showing the Til Swhag actually. Not Yessicas.Hippy, I'm not trying to pick a fight or say that LP weed is good. I am simply saying that the London product in Yessica's photos clearly shows that the glandular heads of the trichomes are missing. I am not implying in any way that someone did something wrong. I am not insulting any club or group. I am simply saying that some problem has either produced cannabis with no glandular trichome heads or some process has removed them.
You seem so intent on supporting this particular club that you appear to not be able to actually look at the picture. Are you sure you don't work for them?
Thanks gb, the Hippy is talking about the difference between ccs and lps. I was referring to the stuff that Yessica posted, not the pic you posted, although it also shows a lack of trichome heads. I agree with you that that is what the Hippy is saying, but that has nothing to do with the point that the weed in Yessica's pics has no trichome heads.I was showing the Til Swhag actually. Not Yessicas.
he's not supporting them so much as he is stating that they have a supply...and don't run out...and they have a set price...they dont hold you over a couch ...unlike LP's
Oh God no. I work for me, I have no job. Now they are nice folks from what I know of them I can say. They are the closest LP to me So I occasionally go there 3 or 4 time a year.Hippy, I'm not trying to pick a fight or say that LP weed is good. I am simply saying that the London product in Yessica's photos clearly shows that the glandular heads of the trichomes are missing. I am not implying in any way that someone did something wrong. I am not insulting any club or group. I am simply saying that some problem has either produced cannabis with no glandular trichome heads or some process has removed them.
You seem so intent on supporting this particular club that you appear to not be able to actually look at the picture. Are you sure you don't work for them?
If you flatten out or compress weed it looks like that, but the heads are still there...stop lookin at the pics only. You being a nurse, you wouldn't diagnose a patient from a photo alone would you. I have said this about LP weed too, a pic isn't the only story.Thanks gb, the Hippy is talking about the difference between ccs and lps. I was referring to the stuff that Yessica posted, not the pic you posted, although it also shows a lack of trichome heads. I agree with you that that is what the Hippy is saying, but that has nothing to do with the point that the weed in Yessica's pics has no trichome heads.