You Have The "Religious Liberty" To Suck Baby Dicks

desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
AlecTheGardener said:
I am sure both would be delicious in a sandwich. Unfortunately the top penis likely is less sensitive then the natural one.


Replace female with 'little baby boy:'
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation


In many African countries they force this upon their young women and girls, this sounds oddly familiar with curcumcising baby boys for non-medical reasons.
Click to expand...
Don't know about the sandwich part, but the rest is spot on.

Circumcision of male infants is a sexual ritual handed down for thousands of years. Buck defends it because it's a Jewish tradition and because he thinks "dead babies belong in the garbage can".

Lots of Christians do it too.
 
AlecTheGardener

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Don't know about the sandwich part, but the rest is spot on.

Circumcision of male infants is a sexual ritual handed down for thousands of years. Buck defends it because it's a Jewish tradition and because he thinks "dead babies belong in the garbage can".

Lots of Christians do it too.
Click to expand...
Sometimes religious rites should not be allowed, when it harms a creature that cannot consent this should true.

Why not alter things so that the child can 'choose' when they are older after indoctrination/religious education, at the very least they get to consent. Let the child do it when they are a young man. The Masai do that, if you make it through that you really are a man.

http://www.circlist.com/rites/maasai.html

Again, they are indoctrinated, etc, but at least you can choose to run off into the bush and live like a hermit with your foreskin intact should you so choose.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
AlecTheGardener said:
Sometimes religious rites should not be allowed, when it harms a creature that cannot consent this should true.

Why not alter things so that the child can 'choose' when they are older after indoctrination/religious education, at the very least they get to consent. Let the child do it when they are a young man. The Masai do that, if you make it through that you really are a man.

http://www.circlist.com/rites/maasai.html

Again, they are indoctrinated, etc, but at least you can choose to run off into the bush and live like a hermit with your foreskin intact should you so choose.
Click to expand...
I totally agree. A conscious, consenting adult can do whatever they like with their own penis. Nobody should be allowed to amputate a baby boy's healthy, normal foreskin.

Europe is WAY ahead of the US in this bit of prehistoric sadism.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Vincent Van Poo is a good one. The actual artist cut off his own ear. I wonder what Van Poo has severed?
Click to expand...
Its believed Van Gogh never actually cut his own ear off, but he actually lost it in a gentlemans dispute but didn't want to rat the dude out.
 
TBoneJack

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
Damn, I can't really believe we're not just all agreeing that it's so wrong for a man to put a child's dick in his mouth, and then cut part of it off.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Nobody should be allowed to amputate a baby boy's healthy, normal foreskin.
Click to expand...
you are aware that there is a difference between amputation and circumcision, right?

or are you one of those deluded rend pawl fanbois who refers to hepatitis B vaccinations, which are transmitted via a needle, as a "sexually transmitted disease"?

your dishonest language gives you away every time, skinhead rat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top