Kingrow1
Well-Known Member
No need to apologize. I knew you were not trying to pick a fight.
In my early days on the internet I used a confrontational, put-down style on message boards. The tone of my answers contained the hidden message that the original poster had no idea of what they were talking about and most of what they had to say was just plain stupid. It took me a while to realize that that approach was totally counter productive. While it might make me feel good that I showed how smart I was and/or how dumb the other guy was, no real knowledge transfer took place. A discussion that would have benefited both of us quickly degraded into a pissing contest where there were no winners.
Now days, I use a very pedantic, teacher-like tone when answering questions. If my answer does not seem to resonate with the questioner I try to figure out where I went wrong and restate the answer to cover what I missed or give an example that hopefully makes a complicated point more clear. In other words, now I'm the stupid one for not providing an understandable answer.
There is no shortage of people looking for a fight. I just don't continue the conversation and they look for a fight somewhere else.
Enough of the warm fuzzies, in answer to your question.
Being even more pedantic than usual, 'monoecious' describes plants that bear separate male and female reproductive structures on the same plant. Examples are: melons, grasses and walnut. 'Dioecious' describes plants that bear male and female reproductive structures on different individuals. Examples are: cannabis, holly and asparagus. There is a third category, 'perfect' where male and female reproductive structures are contained in each individual flower. Examples are: petunia, magnolia and tomato.
I take these meanings to apply to the species in the wild. So, while a Cannabis hermaphrodite produces separate male and female reproductive structures, I think the proper terminology is to call Cannabis dioecious. In other words, I think for Cannabis as we cultivate it, the terminology is not sufficient to describe the various forms of the plant. I consider monoecious cannabis to be a dioecious plant with seriously screwed up growth regulators. Joking aside, it is probably possible to breed for spontaneous hermaphroditism in females and produce what is essentially a monoecious strain of cannabis.
This is my personal opinion, I'm not sure if mainstream Botany takes a different view.
Its not the transfer of knowledge thats the problem its getting ot all in one place, standardizing it and making it mainstream, somehow that gets lost in translation but it is what it is.
Ive not yet seen a feminized strain that promises no hermie traits whatsoever, seeds grow out just fine. Ive always assumed similar genetics produce similar crosses. Different strain crosses make me think more dominant traits will show through in the dominant XY over the recessive xy.
Marijuana inbreeds more stable crosses than the outbreed crosses imo just the outbreed croses might be more interesting. It is thought that marijuana was very prone to inbreeding in the wild