How do you feel about America bombing a hospital?

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Ridiculous. In what universe has this guy earned any semblance of trust from anyone paying any kind of attention?

Good lord.

The mental gymnastics people do.

Those ISIS members are being armed by your government and allies. Have fun with that.
She worships Bernie Sanders saying America is being run by facists and needs a change...

Supports said "facists" bombing a hospital.
 

althor

Well-Known Member
then i'm good with the hospital bombing and trust the president..he's privy to more than we.
Does Bernie trust the president?

You know what would be said if Assad bombed a hospital? Even if the hospital was a KNOWN ISIS hospital? But you know, if it is Obama, the libs all cheer and jump up and down and swear their warmonger alliegance....

The parties have switched again, Dems are back to being hatefilled warmongers and the Republicans are just drifting into losers.
 
Last edited:

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
Ridiculous. In what universe has this guy earned any semblance of trust from anyone paying any kind of attention?

Good lord.

The mental gymnastics people do.

Those ISIS members are being armed by your government and allies. Have fun with that.
You're the one cheering on Putin as some champion of Democracy when he runs a mafia state filled with oligarchs with worse corruption than the US, and rigged elections. Then you sit there and say "The US is funding ISIS! Look at your mental gymnastics. But the rebels in Eastern Ukraine? 100% Ukrainian." Look at the pot calling the kettle black.
 

Clockboy Orange

Well-Known Member
Does Bernie trust the president?

You know what would be said if Assad bombed a hospital? Even if the hospital was a KNOWN ISIS hospital? But you know, if it is Obama, the libs all cheer and jump up and down and swear their warmonger alliegance....

The parties have switched again, Dems are back to being hatefilled warmongers and the Republicans are just drifting into losers.
It is funny how politics always throws people into sections, them libs... them conservatives.

Actually I used to consider myself a republican on fiscal policies and a democrat on social issues. However both parties fail at both, so I am somewhere in the middle. I don't believe that bombing innocents is an effective way to fight terrorism, in fact I am sure some scholar out there can prove that it does the opposite.

Arming terrorists and then acting like we are fighting them is a pretty fucking incredible task. One for say... someone like.... The Wizard of Oz.

Even if the hospital was healing terrorists I wouldn't find it an appropriate use of a missile or cannon or whatever the fuck hit it. It is the fucking law that hospitals aren't supposed to be free game. Our country broke the law and if we are found guilty the only people to suffer are us. The tax paying middle-lower class citizens. If anyone here is a billionaire they will just shrug it off and make more investments on humanitary aid or more weapons and the money will come flowing back in.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Does Bernie trust the president?

You know what would be said if Assad bombed a hospital? Even if the hospital was a KNOWN ISIS hospital? But you know, if it is Obama, the libs all cheer and jump up and down and swear their warmonger alliegance....

The parties have switched again, Dems are back to being hatefilled warmongers and the Republicans are just drifting into losers.
1 Ron Paul Lost
2 who is cheering?

I hear Obama is the most divisive President ever by a bunch of tards who are being devisive
You one of them?
 

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
1 Ron Paul Lost
2 who is cheering?

I hear Obama is the most divisive President ever by a bunch of tards who are being devisive
You one of them?
It's the rallying cry of the Republicans and Conservatards while they foam at the mouth. "Obama! Obama! Immigrants! Benghazhi Benghazi Bergdahl Bergdahl! Bush bush bush! Obama! MUSLIMS! ISLAM! UH UH UH IMMIGRANTS CHINA. China china china. Mexico Benghazi. Fox News liberal bias! Bias Bergdahl? Bias Benghazi!"
 

Clockboy Orange

Well-Known Member
It's the rallying cry of the Republicans and Conservatards while they foam at the mouth. "Obama! Obama! Immigrants! Benghazhi Benghazi Bergdahl Bergdahl! Bush bush bush! Obama! MUSLIMS! ISLAM! UH UH UH IMMIGRANTS CHINA. China china china. Mexico Benghazi. Fox News liberal bias! Bias Bergdahl? Bias Benghazi!"
Yup, the worst part is the ones who actually TRY to find information about what is really going on get cast away like pieces of shit. Why is this? It isn't because we are libtards or conservicunts, it is because we don't support the main Agenda of mainstream media.
 

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
You're the one cheering on Putin as some champion of Democracy when he runs a mafia state filled with oligarchs with worse corruption than the US, and rigged elections. Then you sit there and say "The US is funding ISIS! Look at your mental gymnastics. But the rebels in Eastern Ukraine? 100% Ukrainian." Look at the pot calling the kettle black.
He's no champion of democracy - but he does keep his fucking nose out of other peoples business unlike your country unless provoked. The rebels in Eastern Ukraine are very unlikely 100% Ukrainian given the history of these things. Even the CFR published a long piece about how provocative the moves in Ukraine were and how completely justified Putin was in his response.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
He's no champion of democracy - but he does keep his fucking nose out of other peoples business unlike your country unless provoked. The rebels in Eastern Ukraine are very unlikely 100% Ukrainian given the history of these things. Even the CFR published a long piece about how provocative the moves in Ukraine were and how completely justified Putin was in his response.
In thought Putin said he was there to support ethnic Russians?
Which story is it?
 

hellmutt bones

Well-Known Member
So far it looks like the air strike was called in by the Afghan's because the Taliban was using the facility as a firing position.

Afghan Forces Requested Hospital Air Strike, U.S. Says
U.S. Army General John Campbell says a preliminary report is expected "very shortly."

By Yeganeh Torbati
Posted: 10/05/2015 11:01 AM EDT | Edited: 3 hours ago

WASHINGTON, Oct 5 (Reuters) - Afghan forces asked for U.S. air support while fighting the Taliban in Kunduz shortly before an air strike resulted in the deaths of civilians there, the American commander of international forces in Afghanistan said on Monday.

U.S. Army General John Campbell's comments fell short of squarely acknowledging U.S. responsibility for an air strike that killed 22 people in an Afghan hospital run by aid group Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) on Saturday.

"We have now learned that on October 3 Afghan forces advised that they were taking fire from enemy positions and asked for air support from U.S. forces," Campbell said in a briefing with reporters. "An air strike was then called to eliminate the Taliban threat, and several civilians were accidentally struck."

Campbell said U.S. forces were not under direct fire in the incident and the air strike had not been called on their behalf, contrary to previous statements from the U.S. military. He criticized the Taliban for fighting from within urban areas and putting civilians at risk.

"If errors were committed, we'll acknowledge them," Campbell said. "We'll hold those responsible accountable, and we'll take steps to ensure mistakes are not repeated."

U.S. Army Brigadier General Richard Kim is the senior investigator on the incident and is in Kunduz now, Campbell said. He said the U.S. military will ensure transparency in investigating the incident, and that NATO and Afghan officials would conduct their own investigations as well.

MSF, also known as Doctors Without Borders, has demanded an independent international probe into the strike, which it referred to as a "war crime." Campbell said there would be U.S., NATO, and Afghan investigations into the strike.

"If there's other investigations out there that need to go on, we'll make sure to coordinate those as well," Campbell said.

Campbell declined to comment on whether the United States had called a pause to air strikes, but said he had not suspended "train, advise, and assist" support from U.S. forces to the Afghans.

Campbell said he expected a preliminary report on the incident "very shortly, in the next couple of days."
Yeha sure! They also used some orphanage as the taliban headquarters..:wall:
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
We armed the ones we thought were good. They went over to the other side fir a variety of reasons including. ISIS was the winning team
I like that you admit they got it wrong.

But why did Obama authorise rearming them in the last day or so?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
I like that you admit they got it wrong.

But why did Obama authorise rearming them in the last day or so?
Congressional pressure from Republicans, and bad advice from people in his admin that said it was "possible"

Here is the right way to arm rebels
upload_2015-10-6_19-27-16.png

Air drop 10s of thousands of these in. They want better weapons they can get them themselves
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Congressional pressure from Republicans, and bad advice from people in his admin that said it was "possible"

Here is the right way to arm rebels
View attachment 3515869

Air drop 10s of thousands of these in. They want better weapons they can get them themselves
Islamic State is making over 800 million dollars a year from oil, etc...

They can afford the best shit.
 
Top