You have refused to reply to my request for your "reason". You just ignore mine while denigrating it without bothering to watch the videos. I easily poked holes in your historical data while, again, you seem reluctant to address that which I provided. Historical data actually shows the folly of the co2 argument. Maybe describe for me why if the temp goes up and years later the co2 follows suit...how can the co2 rise be the cause of the temp rise? Logic is certainly ignored with this scenario.
Concerning not listening to contradictory arguments..that is certainly lefty projection as YOU continue to ignore the arguments that started this.
And you're shifting the burden of proof which is an informal logical fallacy. We can cite papers all day long, but you'll still say "That doesn't prove anything until you prove me wrong," which has to be one of the epitomes of an idiotic argument.
Historical data actually shows the folly of the co2 argument? No, it really doesn't.
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/ice_core_co2.html
The highest pre-industrial value recorded in 800,000 years of ice-core record was 298.6 ppmv, in the Vostok core, around 330,000 years ago. Atmospheric CO2 levels have increased markedly in industrial times; measurements in year 2010 at Cape Grim Tasmania and the South Pole both indicated values of 386 ppmv, and are currently increasing at about 2 ppmv/year.
Moreover is CO2 the
only driver of climate change? No, it isn't.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=77
" "the geologic record contains a treasure trove of 'alternative Earths' that allow scientists to study how the various components of the Earth system respond to a range of climatic forcings." Past periods of higher CO2 do not contradict the notion that CO2 warms global temperatures. On the contrary, they confirm the close coupling between CO2 and climate."
And here's a video from Thomas Stocker who's a climate scientist from Switzerland. He's also going to be the next chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
