Student Loan Debt Now Surpasses Credit Card and Auto Loan Debt

Toda's eugenicists are more subtle. They've learned, through experience, that openly gassing entire populations doesn't win over the hearts and minds of the public. So they've developed covert methods of accomplishing the same thing. These coverts methods include convincing people to eat genetically modified foods -- which promote infertility -- to drink fluoride, take vaccines, use synthetic chemicals, increase abortions and pursue other actions that either kill people outright or drastically reduce rates of reproduction.

The idea behind these is that, first off, the culling of the human race can now be accomplished without all the horrifying images of Nazi Germany's gas chambers. While the Jews in World War II had to be forcibly lined up and herded into railroad cars, today's eugenics victims willfully line up at pharmacies to be injected with flu vaccines containing stealth cancer viruses that accomplish the same thing: Death.

Death by vaccines is just slower and more covert than death by Zyklon B.

Importantly, the genocidal properties of vaccines, GMOs, chemical food additives, medications and other synthetic chemicals function as a sort of intelligence test for the population. Those who routinely take vaccines are, of course, stupid. Removing the stupid people -- the "useless eaters" -- from the gene pool is one of the goals of the global controllers. Thus, vaccine propaganda serves as the perfect filter for removing "stupid genes" from the human gene pool. This is no doubt why globalists so aggressively push vaccines on low-income families -- they equate "low income" with "not qualified to reproduce."

Importantly, vaccines contain stealth cancer viruses that are passed along through multiple generations. The SV40 viruses introduced to the population through polio vaccines in the 1950's still exists today in the grandchildren of those who were first vaccinated. This is openly admitted by top scientists who helped develop these vaccines (http://www.naturalnews.com/033584_Dr_Maurice...).

Meanwhile, the efficacy of these vaccines is completely and utterly fabricated, as has been exposed by two whistleblower scientists who blew the lid on scientific fraud taking place at Merck (http://www.naturalnews.com/036328_Merck_mump...).

Many pharmaceuticals directly cause infertility, by the way. Propecia, a Merck baldness drug, has now been linked to infertility and ejaculation disorders (http://www.naturalnews.com/035568_male_baldn...).
 
No they worked for there life time they added by paying taxes most of there lifes TBH they did more then the next generation will and are retired but its ok for the us Government to take the retirement funds and spend it , with a promise to repay it all back interesting huh

What you do not think the Government is playing some role in making people in fertile ??? simple flu shots containing viruses that in time cause you more harm then good .chlorine flouride in water causing same thing ,, think about it really i mean how many people you see trying to have a kid hey 25 40 years ago was fuck all to knock up someone not today right ????
Bill Gates, in particular, happily funds infertility technologies, vaccines and GMOs, all of which are purposely designed to cause infertility and halt new baby births, thereby sharply contracting the human population.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, for example provided significant funding to the University of North Carolina to develop ultrasound infertility technology that could render human sperm unviable for up to six months. Reported by the BBC, this technology was proven effective on rats, and it's only one of 78 different research projects the Gates Foundation has funded under the guise of "global health programs."
http://www.naturalnews.com/034834_Bill_Gates...

Bill Gates famously explained his depopulation agenda through the use of vaccines

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036756_depopulation_agenda_eugenics_survivor.html#ixzz3r9djIqjU
That this is the desire of the global controllers is no secret. It's not debated. This is what today's politicians, bureaucrats and even some misinformed activists of the "environmental" movement wish to achieve -- the reduction of world population to under one billion people. To them, humanity is seen as a threat to the planet and even to itself.

From one point of view, this analysis may actually be correct. It's difficult to see how today's mindless masses of dumbed-down consumers -- steeped in video games, television and junk food -- can offer any meaningful contributions to the future of human civilization. So, from the point of view of the global controllers, "culling the herd" of humanity is actually a good thing. It makes humanity stronger, they say, in much the same way that culling the weaklings from a herd of wild animals improves the aggregate gene pool of the targeted species as a whole.

The globalists argue that today's human gene pool is stalled. The weak and the stupid reproduce just as much as everybody else -- if not more so. The human gene pool is actually devolving, they say, and the only way to bring it back to a point where we have a species capable of reaching for the stars is to eliminate those who aren't smart enough to deserve a spot in the human gene pool.

The word for this is, of course, eugenics. Adolf Hitler pursued the same philosophy: Improve the human race through genocide. Eliminate the weak, the ugly, the stupid. Fire up the incinerators, disarm the target race to be exterminated, and herd them into gas chambers or open pits.
cKnExbt.gif
 
If our country spends more on prisons than education, then a strong argument could be made for the idea that our country WANTS more people to be a menace to society!


If government education is forcibly funded and attendance is compulsory, then a strong argument could be made that public schools are a form of a prison.
 
If government education is forcibly funded and attendance is compulsory, then a strong argument could be made that public schools are a form of a prison.
It sure felt that way when I was attending

But here I am, 10 years later, and thank the federally funded "prison" I "had to" attend as a kid!

You know where I'd (and many others would) be without an education? Back in 1850.

Taxes, and by association, education, is not "forcibly funded". It's funded by your agreement to inhabit the lands claimed by the United States government. If you wish to not pay the taxes incurred upon you by said government, you have every right to pick up shop and vacate the premises. Why should I let you stay in my land without paying the rent? Would you let me stay in your house without paying rent? Do you believe you hold some right to the land owned by the government? What authority gives you this right?
 
It sure felt that way when I was attending

But here I am, 10 years later, and thank the federally funded "prison" I "had to" attend as a kid!

You know where I'd (and many others would) be without an education? Back in 1850.

Taxes, and by association, education, is not "forcibly funded". It's funded by your agreement to inhabit the lands claimed by the United States government. If you wish to not pay the taxes incurred upon you by said government, you have every right to pick up shop and vacate the premises. Why should I let you stay in my land without paying the rent? Would you let me stay in your house without paying rent? Do you believe you hold some right to the land owned by the government? What authority gives you this right?


Stockholm Syndrome.

You have confused education with indoctrination.

Rights don't come from a dictatorial person or organization, you've confused rights with permission.

Agreements to be real and valid should not be unilateral, they should be mutual.

Now go stand in the corner.
 
Stockholm Syndrome.

You have confused education with indoctrination.

Rights don't come from a dictatorial person or organization, you've confused rights with permission.

Agreements to be real and valid should not be unilateral, they should be mutual.

Now go stand in the corner.
There's nothing 'dictatorial' about the arrangement. You want to live on my property and use my utilities rent free. You wouldn't let someone off the streets do that with the things you own and operate, so tell me why you expect you should be afforded those things without having to pay for them? Simply because you occupy the land? What about squatters who occupy empty buildings? Should they be afforded water, electricity, gas and trash just because they currently occupy the residence? How is your libertarian situation any different?

You don't have the right to occupy the things I own. You do have the right to challenge claim of ownership, and I welcome that in a court of law.

For you to sit there and say "____ is mine because of ____, established in XXXX, justified by ____, reinterpreted by ____, published by ____, in the federally appointed newspaper of ____..." is as invalid as a motherfuckin' crackerjack box...


What I think you seem to be confusing is what you believe should be with what is.

I'm not at all, not even a little bit, interested in what you believe should be


I'm interested in what is

If you want to argue what you think should be, go find a college support group, I'm sure there are tons of them out there
 
There's nothing 'dictatorial' about the arrangement. You want to live on my property and use my utilities rent free. You wouldn't let someone off the streets do that with the things you own and operate, so tell me why you expect you should be afforded those things without having to pay for them? Simply because you occupy the land? What about squatters who occupy empty buildings? Should they be afforded water, electricity, gas and trash just because they currently occupy the residence? How is your libertarian situation any different?

You don't have the right to occupy the things I own. You do have the right to challenge claim of ownership, and I welcome that in a court of law.

For you to sit there and say "____ is mine because of ____, established in XXXX, justified by ____, reinterpreted by ____, published by ____, in the federally appointed newspaper of ____..." is as invalid as a motherfuckin' crackerjack box...

What I think you seem to be confusing is what you believe should be with what is.

I'm not at all, not even a little bit, interested in what you believe should be


I'm interested in what is

If you want to argue what you think should be, go find a college support group, I'm sure there are tons of them out there


If you were really viewing what is,accurately, you would realize it's wrong and wouldn't continue to do it or turn a blind rationalizing eye to it when others do it.

Property tax = oxymoronic. Something cannot be both owned by one person and controlled by another without creating a contradiction.
 
If you were really viewing what is,accurately, you would realize it's wrong and wouldn't continue to do it or turn a blind rationalizing eye to it when others do it.

Property tax = oxymoronic. Something cannot be both owned by one person and controlled by another without creating a contradiction.
Why is it wrong to insist you pay me rent to live on my property or pay for the utilities you use?

You don't own the land your property is on, you own the property. The tax is to allow you to park it on my property. Why do you think I should let you live on my property without paying rent?

Why do you feel you are entitled to live on my property rent free?
 
Why is it wrong to insist you pay me rent to live on my property or pay for the utilities you use?

You don't own the land your property is on, you own the property. The tax is to allow you to park it on my property. Why do you think I should let you live on my property without paying rent?

Why do you feel you are entitled to live on my property rent free?


I have solar panels and burn wood that I chop from my land. When I had other utilities, I paid for the portion I used.

I am entitled to be left alone as long as I leave others alone...everyone is. If you believe that, you go against your beliefs when you practice otherwise. Government as an institution runs contrary to that belief though. I am also steadfast in my belief that you and only you own yourself.

The construct of a nation bound together by involuntary and forcible means assures that there will always be resistance to it.
 
I have solar panels and burn wood that I chop from my land. When I had other utilities, I paid for the portion I used.

I am entitled to be left alone as long as I leave others alone...everyone is. If you believe that, you go against your beliefs when you practice otherwise. Government as an institution runs contrary to that belief though. I am also steadfast in my belief that you and only you own yourself.

The construct of a nation bound together by involuntary and forcible means assures that there will always be resistance to it.
You chop wood from my land. How are you "leaving me alone" by occupying the land I own without paying rent? Am I "leaving you alone" by living in your bedroom rent free? Hey man, I'm just living here without paying you rent, what the fuck is the problem? Leave me alone!

Nobody is bound here involuntarily or forcibly. Where the fuck is the gate keeping you in? Who's occupying it? Seems to me only Trump is talking about walls, maybe your gripe stems with him?
 
You chop wood from my land. How are you "leaving me alone" by occupying the land I own without paying rent? Am I "leaving you alone" by living in your bedroom rent free? Hey man, I'm just living here without paying you rent, what the fuck is the problem? Leave me alone!

Nobody is bound here involuntarily or forcibly. Where the fuck is the gate keeping you in? Who's occupying it? Seems to me only Trump is talking about walls, maybe your gripe stems with him?


th
 
And round we go back to fantasy land of "what I wish" instead of "what is"

Natives don't own the land, if they did, none of us would be here. So, back in reality, the US government owns the land, and you wish to occupy it rent free


The United States government is a scam created to extract wealth from people and has done a good job of killing people and jailing them.

The principles of free association insist that any government which holds power over people via threats of force or actual force rather than thru voluntary association, is a government which employs rapist tactics.

The coffee is good, the weed is divine.
 
First off, being mentally ill is not a crime. Funding mental health is more preferable/desireable than housing a gang banger, rapist or child molestor.

Back about 20 or so years ago, it was about 25-30K to house a prisoner. I suspect it's doubled that by now. At any rate, think of it this way, bump off one of those dudes and Sky could finish school. Those guys already made their beds let them lay in them.

Life is about choices; why invest any more in a loosing cause when there are those much more deserving?




Hey, I hear you. Don't get me started.

Yet in order to get the 25-30 K to be used to house a prisoner or to fund Sky's layabout lifestyle, somebody has to STEAL the money in the first place.

Discussing how the loot should be spent conveniently (and wrongfully) ignores the initial theft.

It's theft when we forcibly "invest" other peoples money.
 
College is simply another corporate money grab. Another profoundly well endowed tax-free industry like hospitals

Just another way to get your cash


College is just another tool to add to your tool kit of life. It's what you make of it. If you don't need it, don't use it. Lot's of people never figure it out.
 
What gives the Government the right to claim it as there land ???? panda shouldn't it be your Gods land lol ..
since when do we rely on one entity to decide our fate,,
this is how a Government should be picked @ age 30 every citizen in the USA name gets put into a pot shaken and who ever comes out is the president ..
2 year terms
as for schooling where the fuck is all the tax money going that is being also collected extra for every home owner
For instance there is 35.6 milion people in canada 70 percent of that is home owners that pay
its bad enough that 42 percent of taxes eat up the average person WTF 42 percent this is in Canada
Not sure if its the same in the states but all home owners pay a school tax even if you do not have a fucking kid in school ...
what about the states ?? your telling me 318.9 million @ 43 percent tax where the fuck is the money going ??? your telling me that USA could not pay for schooling
like i posted before education is the foundation to your future its a no brainer i remember obamwit talk about it in one of his speaches
Schooling is the building blocks of every person we learn more in school then at home with most parents fighting over bills and getting divorces etc ..
now far as i am concerned its crooked everywhere where ever there is a chance to make big money sure n the fuck some slime fuck gets in there and does just that rapes everyone
Wait 10 years when you buy water like GAS with a fucking tax but being deemed ilegal in many states to collect rain water is only the hook line an sinker..
Not only do they own the land your on they own the water , the air the rain that falls from the sky
WTF
problem is they push couple inches forward every year taking away more n more of your rights haha they give you legalization of MJ yet behind the curtain took something way more valuable your Dignity
pretty soon your going to drive across some check point and you better have all your paper work in order cause if not then you fucked ,
schooling should be free all of it for the ones that got the grade score not the FREE loaders hanging on for the ride
 

Attachments

  • 12011288_10153043109131087_5419645817243566690_n.jpg
    12011288_10153043109131087_5419645817243566690_n.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 2
Back
Top