Child predator gets busted

Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
SunnyJim said:
I'm not trying to stoke the fire here, but I think that's a risky way to roll.

It implies that any women, or indeed ALL women regardless of circumstance, are better equipped to understand the psychological, emotional, or physical effects of physical or sexual abuse against women than ANY man. Is this a fair statement?

So could we extrapolate that to say "my sister has a deeper understanding of how rape affects women than, say, a leading male psychologist working for the WHO and therefore can/should reject all of his opinions on the matter?" That statement would be invalid, I can assure you.

Gender, race, religion, or creed doesn't supersede knowledge, in my view.

This invites such thinking as "a Christian, all Christians, are better versed in the matters of the history of Jesus Christ than ANY non-Christian" which, again, is invalid.



:peace:
Click to expand...
Wow. That interview.

Just wow.
 
SunnyJim

SunnyJim

Well-Known Member
Xiu said:
Good point, but I think you may have misread the quote.

I shall extinguish this fire before the curtains go ablaze. Fairly certain that Flamingpie was saying he was arguing with actual female members who had talked about their personal sexual assaults Not female members discussing assault in general.

A lack of emotion and tact was present in his interaction with that one female member from the thread. "Arguing" is up for interpretation.

Rather impressed how civil this has remained. I doff my cap.
Click to expand...
Thanks - it is entirely possible that I misinterpreted the quote and/or took it out of context. To compound issues, I'm lazy and haven't done much back-reading. I'm simply following what is quoted in this thread.
 
eye exaggerate

eye exaggerate

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I disagree. Much like the previous accusations, I don't believe things like asking for clarification or following logical conclusions is "combative" behavior. Science doesn't care about your feelings, science follow the evidence
Click to expand...
lol, dude.

You're not a scientist. Using science to talk down to people doesn't make you a scientist. Being cold like science doesn't make you a scientist. Having a scientific bent doesn't make you a scientist.

I spoke with science and science said stop being a dick when you talk to people about science.


tyler.durden said:
Click to expand...
Yes, but I'm sure they didn't go around saying "because science, bitch" while doing things outside of any scientific work.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
tyler.durden said:
Click to expand...
Yes

Give it to me. Let me test it. Let everybody see it for themselves!

This is how science is done

You did it? Show me!

You proved it? Post it, let me do the calculations myself!

You disproved it?... Let's see it!

I can't test your 'maybe'. Your 'maybe' is useless to me. Give me your 'YES!', show me your 'NOW!'. I'm not interested in your "could be's" or your "look's like's"

Fuck that! Fuck you!

Give me something I can test. If I can't test it, don't bring it. Because it's not science, it's bullshit. And bullshit doesn't fly
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
eye exaggerate said:
Not sure what that proves.
Click to expand...
It doesn't prove anything

It shows more evidence of the connection between who the people are who are accusing me of being some kind of rapist

I think it's kind of weird the only people making these accusations all reside within the little clique they've created behind the scenes. Surely the victims would come forward disclosing my horrible behavior! Wouldn't they?

Again, I've been around since 2006, if I'm a rapist, or if I've ever "insulted or threatened" anybody, PLEASE, post it here! How many times does a guy have to ask for the evidence against him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top