Child predator gets busted

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I get it. However, I can't help but notice this new argument was made for the 1st time today by Cannabineer, and repeated by you.

If posts that violate the TOS can never be seen, why wouldn't many of the posts in this thread disappear, along with a large percentage of posts in TNT and other forums?
I have been advancing that argument for three days if you check. It was Annie who named it from the elements of logic.

Which posts here violate the TOS?
And what will happen to them the moment they are highlighted as such?
Sunni and GWN are very efficient mods. But they cannot be everywhere at once 24/7. Once they are apprised, they take care of matters quickly.

This underlines the ephemeral nature of the critical data.
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
I get it. However, I can't help but notice this new argument was made for the 1st time today by Cannabineer, and repeated by you.
Actually CN made it days ago but did not name it, I didn't remember the name until SM brought me back to Philosophy 101 at which point I realized Pad was playing a first year logic class game.

One question all scientists have to ask of their putative hypothesis is, "Is it falsifiable?" if it can not be proven or repeated then it is not a scientifically provable hypothesis and not worthy of study and pad is claiming he is nothing if not scientific.

If posts that violate the TOS can never be seen, why wouldn't many of the posts in this thread disappear, along with a large percentage of posts in TNT and other forums?
I did not say they could never been seen. I said their existence was ephemeral and contrary to the laws/rules of this domain in which we post.


......... sorry had to remove the extra R my Shock Top contributed
 
Last edited:

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
Actually CN made it days ago but did not name it, I didn't remember the name until SM brought me back to Philosophy 101 at which point I realized Pad was playing a first year logic class game.

One question all scientists have to ask of their putative hypothesis is, "Is it falsifiable?" if it can not be proven or repeated then it is not a scientifically provable hypothesis and not worthy of study and pad is claiming he is nothing if not scientific.


I did not say they could never been seen. I said their existence was ephemeral and contrary to the laws/rules of this domain in which we post.


......... sorry had to remove the extra R my Shock Top contributed
i just tried a schock top twisted pretzel, a bit too yeasty for my tastes.. i did find their belgian white a bit more to my liking though..
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
i just tried a schock top twisted pretzel, a bit too yeasty for my tastes.. i did find their belgian white a bit more to my liking though..
Belgian White for the win!! OMG I am so racist, nice to see you here. Well anywhere actually.

I thought we were playing pedo/rapist trump cards
my pedo trump card wins
 

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
I have been advancing that argument for three days if you check. It was Annie who named it from the elements of logic.

Which posts here violate the TOS?
And what will happen to them the moment they are highlighted as such?
Sunni and GWN are very efficient mods. But they cannot be everywhere at once 24/7. Once they are apprised, they take care of matters quickly.

This underlines the ephemeral nature of the critical data.
Ok. I see you blamed the posts removal because of "biased mods". Not the same thing tho.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Ok. I see you blamed the posts removal because of "biased mods". Not the same thing tho.
I agree. Biased mods was the wrong thing to say. I was thinking of Pad's mod buddies, but now I think it is simpler explained by an honest invocation of the TOS by mods working objectively.

The facts should not exist in the specified domain. Once they are seen, they will be removed. So I amend my statement on that topic.
 

skunkd0c

Well-Known Member

This girl above says she was raped by 110 men in 22 hours
"In a memoir of her heart-stopping experiences - Bought & Sold
Stephens, 25, recalled how she was regularly made to sleep with up to 50 men a day
Once, she was forced to have sex with 110 men in 22 hours."

to save you guys opening your calculator apps on your eyephones i worked out this gives each man 12 minutes if they share the time fairly among themselves

did she increase the numbers to help sell her book ?
 

RainbowBrite86

Well-Known Member
i can go with that, but where does this guy below fit in to the trump pecking order ?

this man is a child rapist that was raped and stabbed in prison by 20 men
View attachment 3650712
You know....I can't stand what people do to each other. Even when I feel it's...somewhat justified. Yes, child rapists do terrible things. But I wish people would just shoot them in the head and be done with it. It's a terrible, inhumane, sick thing to rape a child. But...turning yourself into a terrible, inhumane, sick person just to try to correct their wrong doesn't seem like it does much good either.
 

ClaytonBigsby

Well-Known Member
Clayton wants your information, not me. That's not a quote, that's a link to his thread - 'How can I get Personal Info on Someone?' (<--click that)

So why does Clayton want to know how to get people's personal information?






Clearly that thread I started (in support) was mocking you. I planted that seed a long time ago waiting for you to find it and use it. The fucking sweet irony is that it was about you.

What;s it like always being five steps behind me?

The comparison of you to Sheldon Cooper is ridiculous. It;s like comparing Jeffrey Dahmer to Wolfgang Puck.

You should be wondering how I know your thoughts so well.




You bore me.

 
Top