Palin faking birth of her new baby

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
No I'm not. You're alluding to the possibility that he was fucked up when he came to me because of his upbringing by his parents. I still know his parents and they're good people...especially his father. James made his choices...I corrected them.

i'm not "alluding" to anything. this is why i asked. :roll:


done.:blsmoke:
 

FLoJo

Well-Known Member
I do agree that no matter what kids are going to have sex.. education for both abstinence and contraception are both equally important. Now mistakes do happen, but in my opinion you would me much more likely to get an std than to get preggers this day in age.. i have been sexually active since i was in 8th grade and my parents made it painfully clear why i want to use a condom every time.. and guess what it works.. as much as people want to say kids at that age are independent thinkers and make their own decisions the fact is that children are a reflection of their parents.

dave even if your kid drinks smokes whatever that is natural experimentation that everyone does and obviously you taught him to be smart and use a condom.. he could go out and bang every wet pussy that let him slide in and hes gonna get one preggers but obviously something you taught him rubbed off and he made smart decisions.. and i commend him for defending our freedoms.

that being said parents can be bad no matter how old or young they are but i think that in this day in age 99 percent of kids that get pregnant are just being stupid and not using protection thinking oh it could never happen to me blah blah...

while some will sympathize with their situation i think a good portion of people will look down upon her parenting skills and ableness to educate kids effectively..

FLo
 

FLoJo

Well-Known Member
You still here? You'll figure out soon enough I'm not reading your gibberish. That's just too much to expect from an idiot.

Thanks for doing all that research, though.

Black coffee, no sugar.
I wouldnt expect you to respond considering you cant contest it. Its the facts, and you incriminated yourself. i also do give you a little pity because i understand that most of the words and concepts used are probably way over your head.

Good to see your spine has finally fallen out when backed into a corner.. i laid it out in black and white to you and everyone else that you NEVER HAD A VALID ARGUMENT. keep pulling shit out of your ass, its not coffee.

Ive said my piece... suck it

FLo
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
I wouldnt expect you to respond considering you cant contest it. Its the facts, and you incriminated yourself. i also do give you a little pity because i understand that most of the words and concepts used are probably way over your head.

Good to see your spine has finally fallen out when backed into a corner.. i laid it out in black and white to you and everyone else that you NEVER HAD A VALID ARGUMENT. keep pulling shit out of your ass, its not coffee.

Ive said my piece... suck it

FLo
Boy am I shamed. LOL!

Okay you did not delete the insult. Mea culpa.

I'm not gonna argue with you about the argument. People can read for themselves. However, your sophistry is quite tiresome.

Keep on cryin'. It suits you. :hump:
 

ccodiane

New Member
Explicit Sex Education Is Opposed by Most Parents in Survey - New York Time

The survey found that while most parents approved of their children being taught about using condoms and contraceptives to avoid pregnancy and disease, they did not want them being taught about masturbation, sexual fantasies and homosexuality and did not want middle schools' teaching children how to unroll condoms, all subjects in the sex education guidelines.




Palin backed abstinence-only education - First Read - msnbc.com

In an Eagle Forum Alaska questionnaire, Palin gave this response to the following question: Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?

Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/levi-johnston-bristol-pal_n_123089.html

Bristol Palin's baby daddy has been revealed to be 18 year-old Levi Johnston. Sarah Palin announced that her 17 year-old daughter is five months pregnant Monday. Read More at HuffPost's Sarah Palin big news pag
 

misshestermoffitt

New Member
Explicit Sex Education Is Opposed by Most Parents in Survey - New York Time

The survey found that while most parents approved of their children being taught about using condoms and contraceptives to avoid pregnancy and disease, they did not want them being taught about masturbation, sexual fantasies and homosexuality and did not want middle schools' teaching children how to unroll condoms, all subjects in the sex education guidelines.




Palin backed abstinence-only education - First Read - msnbc.com

In an Eagle Forum Alaska questionnaire, Palin gave this response to the following question: Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?

Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.




Levi Johnston: Bristol Palin's Baby Daddy Revealed (PHOTOS)

Bristol Palin's baby daddy has been revealed to be 18 year-old Levi Johnston. Sarah Palin announced that her 17 year-old daughter is five months pregnant Monday. Read More at HuffPost's Sarah Palin big news pag

I guess it is beyond you that abstinince only education is this "sex don't to it".

She only supports funding for abstinince only education. It was WIDELY reported on CNN headline hews this morning.

That means only schools who teach abstinince receive the government funding. School that teach "condoms , use them" don't receive any funding.

I wonder what their annual welfare cost is? All those pregnant teenagers.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Is it too far fetched for some of you to fathom that sex education is the personal responsiblity of parents and not government schools?

Vi
 

misshestermoffitt

New Member
Is it too far fetched for some of you to fathom that sex education is the personal responsiblity of parents and not government schools?

Vi

I dealt with sex ed for my own kids. Mine are adults and there have been no pregnancies. Most parents do NOT talk to their kids about sex. Most parents barely talk to their kids at all.

We are paying schools to educate. Sex education is very important. How about this, lets not tell kids about sex, then they'll just never know it exists. Right?

It doesn't seem that approach worked for Palin. I"m sure her daughters sex talk was "sex is evil, don't do it", then the girl put on her shoes and ran down to mom's office and banged one of her aides. She needed to see for herself about the evils of sex. That in itself is proof that abstinence only education does NOT work.

There are already an obscene number of pregnant teens, teens with babies and baby daddy's running from girl to girl impregnating them. Eventually we're going to have to stop sticking our heads in the sand and deal with it. Like or not, todays preganant teens are tomorrows leaders.
 

Stoney McFried

Well-Known Member
That's right, it is.But it should be an elective class.Parents can give permission for kids to attend or not.There.Everyone is happy.:mrgreen:
Is it too far fetched for some of you to fathom that sex education is the personal responsiblity of parents and not government schools?

Vi
 

medicineman

New Member
You speak of yourself. Things were going pretty good for me then, just as they are now. Your unprovoked passive/aggressive cheap shots only betray desperation on your part.

I respond in kind to your inane attempts at insult, but I am the hypocrite? LOL! That's funny. Not ha ha funny. Sad funny.

Mine was a response to your statement, Professor. Remember this?

Don't presume to lecture me on internet etiquette. You don't have a leg to stand on.
Big words from the internet professor. You're probably a 4'10" weasel with a shriveled up pee-pee and an attitude, I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
 

medicineman

New Member
Wow and you would applaud lying to the public to soften the reaction of the real story:clap:.................whatever it takes to "win" right
__________________
This is clearly the republican way, the way you like it Johnny.
 

ccodiane

New Member
I suppose we could call the pregnant 17 year old of hers a source. I would think that if that girl had received some sex education she might not be pregnant in the first place. I'm also thinking that the Aide of Palin's that got her pregnant is another source. Had he had some sex education he might not be know as Baby daddy.

If she is so on top of contraception, why didn't her daughter have any contraception?
Palins aid, huh? Let's forget about all the things you've gotten wrong so far. What have you gotten right, that's the question.bongsmilie
 

ccodiane

New Member
I dealt with sex ed for my own kids. Mine are adults and there have been no pregnancies. Most parents do NOT talk to their kids about sex. Most parents barely talk to their kids at all.

We are paying schools to educate. Sex education is very important. How about this, lets not tell kids about sex, then they'll just never know it exists. Right?

It doesn't seem that approach worked for Palin. I"m sure her daughters sex talk was "sex is evil, don't do it", then the girl put on her shoes and ran down to mom's office and banged one of her aides. She needed to see for herself about the evils of sex. That in itself is proof that abstinence only education does NOT work.

There are already an obscene number of pregnant teens, teens with babies and baby daddy's running from girl to girl impregnating them. Eventually we're going to have to stop sticking our heads in the sand and deal with it. Like or not, todays preganant teens are tomorrows leaders.
Todays aborted children could have been tomorrows leaders.:roll:
 
Top