Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dr.Pecker

Well-Known Member
so rocks hitting the moon somehow make it round, what are they chipping bits off like a 3 d lathe or adding so much more rock that the oblateness goes? moon is very round indeed but maybe its very slow axial spin of one rotaion per month is the explanation more than some meteor moulding/lathing
Clearly I said the moon was square with round edges.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Another feeble ad hominem attack. Prove your self styled genius and refute me with logic and scientific proof rather than insist I am uneducated. That seems to be your only defense here.

I'll make another appeal to common sense: That is why I call it magical. It's ''proportional effect.'' Gravity has a size sensor? BULLSHIT.
Not a size sensor, a mass sensor. You can easily test this yourself with common household items. I'll use a gym example: They have 5 pound and 10 pound dumbbells, can you feel the extra force it takes to lift the ten pounder? That's gravity acting on double the mass of the five pounder. It's pulling harder on the dumbbell with more mass, that's gravity's magical, proportional effect. For the record, I did not use the dumbbell example as an ad hominem...
 

Mellowman2112

Well-Known Member
Not a size sensor, a mass sensor. You can easily test this yourself with common household items. I'll use a gym example: They have 5 pound and 10 pound dumbbells, can you feel the extra force it takes to lift the ten pounder? That's gravity acting on double the mass of the five pounder. It's pulling harder on the dumbbell with more mass, that's gravity's magical, proportional effect. For the record, I did not use the dumbbell example as an ad hominem...
Silly rabbit, it's because the dumbbell weighs double. It really is that simple.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Another feeble ad hominem attack. Prove your self styled genius and refute me with logic and scientific proof rather than insist I am uneducated. That seems to be your only defense here.

I'll make another appeal to common sense: That is why I call it magical. It's ''proportional effect.'' Gravity has a size sensor? BULLSHIT.
I'm systematically schooling you with both science and logic. The ad hominems are merely for color...

Silly rabbit, it's because the dumbbell weighs double. It really is that simple.
Very good. That's what WEIGHT is, the pull of gravity on an object. How have you managed to live this long???
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
I hope you're beginning to see how out of your depth you are, and your major errors in comprehension that are right in front of your face...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight


In science and engineering, the weight of an object is usually taken to be the force on the object due to gravity.[1][2] Weight is a vector whose magnitude (a scalar quantity), often denoted by an italic letter W, is the product of the mass m of the object and the magnitude of the local gravitational acceleration g;[3] thus: W = mg. The unit of measurement for weight is that of force, which in the International System of Units (SI) is the newton. For example, an object with a mass of one kilogram has a weight of about 9.8 newtons on the surface of the Earth, and about one-sixth as much on the Moon. In this sense of weight, a body can be weightless only if it is far away (in principle infinitely far away) from any other mass. Although weight and mass are scientifically distinct quantities, the terms are often confused with each other in everyday use.[4]
 

Mellowman2112

Well-Known Member
I'm systematically schooling you with both science and logic. The ad hominems are merely for color...




Very good. That's what WEIGHT is, the pull of gravity on an object. How have you managed to live this long???


What you are describing is density. So if you are correct, a 777 should have to have X times the engine power of a 737 in order to defeat this magical force called gravity.

I'm in a search for the truth, I found this, which doesn't help my argument but for sciences sake here it is.

The standard CFM56-3 jet engines on a 737-500 generate 18,500 pounds of thrust; x 2= 37000 pounds of thrust
takeoff Weight, 52.390 kg

777 Boeing 777-300ER = 775,000 lb (350,678 kg) engine thrust--It is powered by the GE90-115Bturbofan, the most powerful jet engine with a maximum thrust of 115,300 lbf (513 kN). x 2 230,000 lbs of thrust.

The 777 is seven times heavier its engines should have to have much more than 7 times the power of the 737

Due to the much larger mass yet the numbers don't show this to be the case.
 
Last edited:

Mellowman2112

Well-Known Member
I hope you're beginning to see how out of your depth you are, and your major errors in comprehension that are right in front of your face...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight


In science and engineering, the weight of an object is usually taken to be the force on the object due to gravity.[1][2] Weight is a vector whose magnitude (a scalar quantity), often denoted by an italic letter W, is the product of the mass m of the object and the magnitude of the local gravitational acceleration g;[3] thus: W = mg. The unit of measurement for weight is that of force, which in the International System of Units (SI) is the newton. For example, an object with a mass of one kilogram has a weight of about 9.8 newtons on the surface of the Earth, and about one-sixth as much on the Moon. In this sense of weight, a body can be weightless only if it is far away (in principle infinitely far away) from any other mass. Although weight and mass are scientifically distinct quantities, the terms are often confused with each other in everyday use.[4]

A spade will always be a spade no matter in what psuedo scientific terms it is couched. A pig is a pig no matter how much lipstick you might paint on it.
 

714steadyeddie

Well-Known Member
I hope you're beginning to see how out of your depth you are, and your major errors in comprehension that are right in front of your face...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight


In science and engineering, the weight of an object is usually taken to be the force on the object due to gravity.[1][2] Weight is a vector whose magnitude (a scalar quantity), often denoted by an italic letter W, is the product of the mass m of the object and the magnitude of the local gravitational acceleration g;[3] thus: W = mg. The unit of measurement for weight is that of force, which in the International System of Units (SI) is the newton. For example, an object with a mass of one kilogram has a weight of about 9.8 newtons on the surface of the Earth, and about one-sixth as much on the Moon. In this sense of weight, a body can be weightless only if it is far away (in principle infinitely far away) from any other mass. Although weight and mass are scientifically distinct quantities, the terms are often confused with each other in everyday use.[4]

I love how it's called the THEORY of gravity not fact


Please explain why can balloons float away? Hot air, helium.

I'm an idiot who needs to be spoon fed
 

714steadyeddie

Well-Known Member
They say there are thousands of satellites, how come I only get computer generated images when i search for photographs of the earth. There should be millions by now.
Ya and how there's so many satellites yet we never hear any of them crashing into eachother or falling down. Why isn't there a job as a satellite repair man yet?
 

Mellowman2112

Well-Known Member
I love how it's called the THEORY of gravity not fact


Please explain why can balloons float away? Hot air, helium.

I'm an idiot who needs to be spoon fed
If it is powerfull enough to hold the oceans in around a 7500 mile curve of the earth while spinning at 1000 miles an hour and nothing sloshes out, it would make goo of humans not to mention other life on earth.
 

714steadyeddie

Well-Known Member


Go fast rocket hits dome...


Intrestesing enough there's a guy who broke down that go fast rocket lunch (broke the record for highest amateur rocket launched) once the video shows the moon the guy tracked it down the position and time of day and the moon shouldn't have been there
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top