Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

[714steadyeddie]

You don't hear scientists back flat earth for the same reasons you don't hear doctors talk about the cure for cancer even tho it exists and the US government has patented the rights to it


Its all curropt starting from the top. Flat Earthers will never go away because more people are becoming Aware.

It's the new age and the elite ruling class knows that times are changing

 

[714steadyeddie]

To qualify as proof, it must be a primary reference, not a YouTube vid.

Why can't you just watch it. It clearly brings to proof and you can cross check the work on our own computer

What you scared

 

[714steadyeddie]

Free masons
Zionest
Statist
Elite
1%

It's all deeper than anyone can imagine

 

[tangerinegreen555]

Its all curropt

Wow

 

[bizfactory]

lol pure entertainment

 

[SunnyJim]

Flat Earthers will never go away because more people are becoming Aware.

 

[curious2garden]

You don't hear scientists back flat earth for the same reasons you don't hear doctors talk about the cure for cancer even tho it exists and the US government has patented the rights to it


Its all curropt starting from the top. Flat Earthers will never go away because more people are becoming Aware.

It's the new age and the elite ruling class knows that times are changing

LOL cancer is all one type huh? Bro do you even histopathology? Flat earthers won't go away because

 

[cannabineer]

Why can't you just watch it. It clearly brings to proof and you can cross check the work on our own computer

What you scared

 

[curious2garden]

Wow

With extra cur

 

[Mellowman2112]

Then articulate your theory.

(A theory is a numerically precise statement of WHAT happens. Theories do not cover the WHY)

From which your equation of "theory" with "my unbacked but passionately held OPINION" simply does not compete. I don't want your OPINION. You say you have a theory? Make with it. Be quantitative.

Odd that you accuse Tyler of saying "I believe because they told me" but are fine with "My opinion is truth". Hmmmm.

We were discussing the theory of gravity. Gravity is not necessary on a non moving plane. Why would it be necessary on a non moving plane? If density has the same results due to not being a ball, there is no need for gravity.

 

[Mellowman2112]

@UncleBuck here ya go he tests antisemite positive


If that's what you learned in the trades you missed the point there too.

Prof. Walter Kotschnig told Holyoke College students to keep their minds open—“but not so open that your brains fall out.”

Why is a statment of fact anitsemetic? They own the media, they own the so called private federal reserve, they own the politicians.

 

[cannabineer]

We were discussing the theory of gravity. Gravity is not necessary on a non moving plane. Why would it be necessary on a non moving plane? If density has the same results due to not being a ball, there is no need for gravity.

 

[Suspire Knowledge]

Our atmosphere is quite constant in composition through its thickness. The forces of diffusion and convection are much to strong at our temperatures and pressures to cause stratification by component density.

True, over time equilibrium is reached. But the point I was making was in regards to him using smoke to disprove gravity. On a short time scale the particles in smoke and air immediately around it expand, becomes less dense, and rise essentially due to convection and thus gravitational force having less of an effect for a short period of time? I very well could be mistaken in my understanding of this process. So please don't take my response as argumentative, or disrespectful. If I am mistaken I would like to know, and you seem very reasonable as well as knowledgeable.

 

[eye exaggerate]

ROTFLMAO...

sorry...couldn't get past the 1st line...

Just trying to keep it (bending) light in here

 

[reddan1981]

 

[reddan1981]

 

[SunnyJim]

Why is a statment of fact anitsemetic? They own the media, they own the so called private federal reserve, they own the politicians.

"They?" Who, exactly?

 

[reddan1981]

 

[curious2garden]

True, over time equilibrium is reached. But the point I was making was in regards to him using smoke to disprove gravity. On a short time scale the particles in smoke and air immediately around it expand, becomes less dense, and rise essentially due to convection and thus gravitational force having less of an effect for a short period of time? I very well could be mistaken in my understanding of this process. So please don't take my response as argumentative, or disrespectful. If I am mistaken I would like to know, and you seem very reasonable as well as knowledgeable.

Gravitational force is constant

 

[cannabineer]

True, over time equilibrium is reached. But the point I was making was in regards to him using smoke to disprove gravity. On a short time scale the particles in smoke and air immediately around it expand, becomes less dense, and rise essentially due to convection and thus gravitational force having less of an effect for a short period of time? I very well could be mistaken in my understanding of this process. So please don't take my response as argumentative, or disrespectful. If I am mistaken I would like to know, and you seem very reasonable as well as knowledgeable.

I'm not sure if I understand precisely what you are saying. If you are saying that in a warmer gas, the particles make themselves more room ... yes. Bulk density goes down, and that parcel of gas becomes somewhat buoyant. But gravitational force stays constant; the mass of the particles is invariant and thus their weight.