100+ dead in France

[GardenGnome83]

Bullshit, you are the troll and you got caught.

You own more guns than me and your other positions are irrelevant.

I will not be holding my breath for an apology but maybe you should contemplate your actions and attitudes here.

Wonder how all excited you would be if suddenly you were in a group that was not allowed weapons. You would probably be all like... Ok, the government said I cant have guns so I am gonna give them up like a good citizen. Or maybe you have not bothered to think far enough to see yourself in that situation.

Do you understand you are no different than any other group that wants those 'other' people to not have guns. It is exactly what the liberals want, only the government having control of them and that doesnt mean you.

Congratulations on being in favor of the removal of your rights at government whim.

Lol, nice try! You're like the moron who gets in a word and shuffles his happy ass home to brag about it!
You are ALMOST believable. We all know that you likely have 10+ firearms.
You are really pathetic trying to project your weak little case against me.
Well, you obviously aren't a lawyer or a salesman, so it doesn't cut the mustard. I'm not in danger of losing my gun rights any time soon. Here are reasons why; I'm not a member of any clubs/gangs, I'm not a member of any religious sect/cult, I pay my taxes, I don't drink alcohol, I live in the woods and need protection from toothy things and rednecks, and I'm pretty sure there is no movement to take anyone's weapons. No one has come and taken any of mine! That's all in your head.
My rifle has been in it's case since my grandfather died and willed it to me, in 2002. I've owned the 1911 for a while though. I'm an expert shot too. Does that make me one of you????
So, how about you pick someone else to TRY to make look bad. You need some practice. Turd.

 

[NLXSK1]

Lol, nice try! You're like the moron who gets in a word and shuffles his happy ass home to brag about it!
You are ALMOST believable. We all know that you likely have 10+ firearms.
You are really pathetic trying to project your weak little case against me.
Well, you obviously aren't a lawyer or a salesman, so it doesn't cut the mustard. I'm not in danger of losing my gun rights any time soon. Here are reasons why; I'm not a member of any clubs/gangs, I'm not a member of any religious sect/cult, I pay my taxes, I don't drink alcohol, I live in the woods and need protection from toothy things and rednecks, and I'm pretty sure there is no movement to take anyone's weapons. No one has come and taken any of mine! That's all in your head.
My rifle has been in it's case since my grandfather died and willed it to me, in 2002. I've owned the 1911 for a while though. I'm an expert shot too. Does that make me one of you????
So, how about you pick someone else to TRY to make look bad. You need some practice. Turd.

I accept you for your word, and I ask the same respect from you.

I own 1 handgun, am not a member of the NRA. I am spiritual but do not believe in any defined religion. I dont drink and I am not sure why you think I am so different from you.

The government wants to let an unelected bureaucracy infringe upon my 2nd amendment rights without due process. That is against the constitution and another encroachment. You say that you dont fear the loss of your rights and that is fine. I do have concern about the encroachment of government on my rights.

Hillary Clinton wants to reinstate an assault weapons ban that humerously includes non-assault weapons that just look scary. She doesnt want to do it to make you safer, she wants to do it to make her safer. I guarantee you one of her body guards has an automatic assault weapon nearby.

I am not a gun nut, I am a gun rights nut. I will continuously protect my rights against the encroachment of the federal government above and beyond the constitution.

You are the one that started the conversation with accusations that turned out to be not true. I am not making you look like anything, that is what you have done to yourself through this conversation.

No one has come to take your weapons yet because people have defended your right to keep them. Stop being part of the problem.

 

[GardenGnome83]

I accept you for your word, and I ask the same respect from you.

I own 1 handgun, am not a member of the NRA. I am spiritual but do not believe in any defined religion. I dont drink and I am not sure why you think I am so different from you.

The government wants to let an unelected bureaucracy infringe upon my 2nd amendment rights without due process. That is against the constitution and another encroachment. You say that you dont fear the loss of your rights and that is fine. I do have concern about the encroachment of government on my rights.

Hillary Clinton wants to reinstate an assault weapons ban that humerously includes non-assault weapons that just look scary. She doesnt want to do it to make you safer, she wants to do it to make her safer. I guarantee you one of her body guards has an automatic assault weapon nearby.

I am not a gun nut, I am a gun rights nut. I will continuously protect my rights against the encroachment of the federal government above and beyond the constitution.

You are the one that started the conversation with accusations that turned out to be not true. I am not making you look like anything, that is what you have done to yourself through this conversation.

No one has come to take your weapons yet because people have defended your right to keep them. Stop being part of the problem.

Let me guess...
You thought Obama was going to take them too, right?
Hillary may just do it. She is the war candidate, and needs a passive electorate to get shit done. So we wait and see, I guess. I am liberal, meaning I care about others way more than I should, so I will never vote for that. I'll just write in Donald duck, and hope she keels over.
Look within yourself for the truth.
Don't be so Nugent, you look like a domestic terrorist hangin with badseed

 

[NLXSK1]

Let me guess...
You thought Obama was going to take them too, right?
Hillary may just do it. She is the war candidate, and needs a passive electorate to get shit done. So we wait and see, I guess. I am liberal, meaning I care about others way more than I should, so I will never vote for that. I'll just write in Donald duck, and hope she keels over.
Look within yourself for the truth.
Don't be so Nugent, you look like a domestic terrorist hangin with badseed

I think they all are going to take them. If you dont defend the constitution you lose it. I dont care which party is in power when they start saying that you have rights unless this government agency suddenly decides you dont. Because that means we have priviledges not rights. Driving is a priviledge granted when the government decides to give it to you, the ownership of firearms is not.

It is ok that you dont care about defending your rights but please dont spit or shit on those people that do defend them.

 

[cannabineer]

Lol, rifle team? Hahaha! That is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read about! A team of micro-penis having, gun-toting weirdos lol.
Do you drive a lifted pickup, with some type of cliché of a bumper sticker (come and take 'em!), and camo somewhere on it?
I bet you do!
"Come and see how educated I am about guns". Pussy, you would need a gun. Cowards do.

I was on a rifle team once, briefly.

My enormous hydraulic attribute interfered too much when firing from the prone position.

I will say the idea that gun ownership correlates with cowardice is not only false but fundamentally dishonest. I detect a social engineer wearing the flayed pelt of a social justice warrior. It is that sort that seeks to insinuate that guns are somehow intrinsically uncivilized.

Fact is, guns in society are a profoundly civilizing influence. Social butthurt doesn't change the fact, but it is surprisingly effective at masking it. You are dangerous to a free society, gnome saying?

 

[Flaming Pie]

 

[cannabineer]

Just shut up.
Gun ownership doesn't civilize anyone.
You are a moron. Gnome sayin?

By the rules of debate you just lost, Mr. Name-caller. Thanks for the effortless win.

Consider: widespread civilian gun carry would positively stop events like the "shooting massacres" of which our media are so gleefully enthralled. Including 9-11 itself.

For this reason and its cognates I expressly oppose the sort of social-comment cant that seeks to denigrate the full and free ownership and use of guns and other weapons of (personal and political) defense. It is dishonest social engineering at its core. I mean when a sitting Supreme Court justice states that the 2nd Amendment is not a right of the citizen but of the State, you lose every shot at a rational argument, since you just slashed the throat of the Bill of Rights' basic premise. The hypocrisy of anti-gun sentiment is laid bloody-bare at that point.

 

[bundee1]

So in your scenario a citizen stops a mass killing everyone once in a while but ends up shooting the asshole who cuts him off in traffic. On wait that sounds like the Police we have now.

 

[Flaming Pie]

By the rules of debate you just lost, Mr. Name-caller. Thanks for the effortless win.

Consider: widespread civilian gun carry would positively stop events like the "shooting massacres" of which our media are so gleefully enthralled. Including 9-11 itself.

For this reason and its cognates I expressly oppose the sort of social-comment cant that seeks to denigrate the full and free ownership and use of guns and other weapons of (personal and political) defense. It is dishonest social engineering at its core. I mean when a sitting Supreme Court justice states that the 2nd Amendment is not a right of the citizen but of the State, you lose every shot at a rational argument, since you just slashed the throat of the Bill of Rights' basic premise. The hypocrisy of anti-gun sentiment is laid bloody-bare at that point.

Arming pilots is hardly a new idea. For decades, up through the 1980s, some pilots carried guns on board--at first to protect the U.S. mail and then to combat hijackings. Although the practice petered out, the government did not formally ban it until July 2001.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/08/26/time.pilots/

Fucked up. Too many coincidences with the Bush and Clinton family. Fucking disgusting.

 

[NLXSK1]

So in your scenario a citizen stops a mass killing everyone once in a while but ends up shooting the asshole who cuts him off in traffic. On wait that sounds like the Police we have now.

What is your proposed solution? Only guns for non-assholes?

 

[cannabineer]

So in your scenario a citizen stops a mass killing everyone once in a while but ends up shooting the asshole who cuts him off in traffic. On wait that sounds like the Police we have now.

How many traffic-asshole shootings are therein the USA per annum? That should be an easy stat to find.

Compare with the number of times possessing a gun has stopped a violent crime. There is no way to get those data because we don't tally "the near misses".

 

[NLXSK1]

http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/08/26/time.pilots/

Fucked up. Too many coincidences with the Bush and Clinton family. Fucking disgusting.

What I find hilarious about that article is that the writer quotes a safety expert about the danger of putting a gun in the hands of a guy who has control of the entire aircraft.

He already has a deadly weapon loaded with fuel. When did pilots suddenly become untrustworthy?

 

[cannabineer]

Jesus, I'm not anti-gun. I just believe we need to keep guns out of the hands of extremists and gangsters. To start.
You win nothing.
Fuck off. It's so tiring dealing with turds like you.
I'm going fishing...

More win, Mr. Name-caller. Fwiw my name is neither Jesus nor turd.

You are plainly a gun ownership hater. You equated gun ownership with cowardice and being on a rifle team with microphallus and bro truck ownership. Your lie is exposed.

It is your breed of extremist and gangster who is the most scary of all ... the sort who co-opts the system and consumes it from within, like a Sphex larva. . Add a nature impervious to reason to the mix, and ~sigh~ now I remember why I left this subforum. It's dogma Fight Club. You have your religion; I have mine. I like mine better as it isn't a proselytizing faith.

 

[Flaming Pie]

What I find hilarious about that article is that the writer quotes a safety expert about the danger of putting a gun in the hands of a guy who has control of the entire aircraft.

He already has a deadly weapon loaded with fuel. When did pilots suddenly become untrustworthy?

Right? If they are safe enough to fly an airplane, then they should be safe enough to own a firearm on that airplane.

 

[Flaming Pie]

More win, Mr. Name-caller. Fwiw my name is neither Jesus nor turd.

You are plainly a gun ownership hater. You equated gun ownership with cowardice and being on a rifle team with microphallus and bro truck ownership. Your lie is exposed.

It is your breed of extremist and gangster who is the most scary of all ... the sort who co-opts the system and consumes it from within, like a Sphex larva. . Add a nature impervious to reason to the mix, and ~sigh~ now I remember why I left this subforum. It's dogma Fight Club. You have your religion; I have mine. I like mine better as it isn't a proselytizing faith.

Nah, you should stay and smack them around with your massive brain.

I will be googling Sphex larva.

Winter is coming. Polar bears are welcome.

 

[GardenGnome83]

More win, Mr. Name-caller. Fwiw my name is neither Jesus nor turd.

You are plainly a gun ownership hater. You equated gun ownership with cowardice and being on a rifle team with microphallus and bro truck ownership. Your lie is exposed.

It is your breed of extremist and gangster who is the most scary of all ... the sort who co-opts the system and consumes it from within, like a Sphex larva. . Add a nature impervious to reason to the mix, and ~sigh~ now I remember why I left this subforum. It's dogma Fight Club. You have your religion; I have mine. I like mine better as it isn't a proselytizing faith.

I love how you act so smart, but spew stupidity.
Lord of the idiots, you are.

 

[cannabineer]

Nah, you should stay and smack them around with your massive brain.

I will be googling Sphex larva.

Winter is coming. Polar bears are welcome.

It's that wasp that lays its egg in the (caterpillar, spider, not sure which right now) and the larva eats the host from the inside but in a manner that leaves it alive until the end.

As for brain, no ... that sounds messy. My brain is pretty scattered already.

 

[NLXSK1]

I love how you act so smart, but spew stupidity.
Lord of the idiots, you are.

If there was a maturity test for gun ownership you would have been on the no fly list a long time ago.

 

[GardenGnome83]

If there was a maturity test for gun ownership you would have been on the no fly list a long time ago.

Sure. Lol

 

[bundee1]

If there was a maturity test for gun ownership you would have been on the no fly list a long time ago.

But there are no tests and that is the point. The idiots arguing here and spitting racist bullshit everyday own guns too. All the fake ass gangsters, undercover cops, burnouts, junkies, and wannabes on this site can get one.