Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

[Indagrow]

The osuth pole is positive and the north pole is negative according to wikipidia.for what thats worth. Acknowledged a point for you.

If you acknowledge a point for that then you acknowledge the existence of poles and therefor a spherical earth.

There is no way you got a degree when you acknowledge Wikipedia as a credible source. Not scholarly in the least bit it's a peer submitted and reviewed source ...

 

[Douglas.Curtis]

The comment about "The world has 2 poles!" was hilarious. Yes. I mean, what kid never got to play with pole magnets as a kid? I guess this one?

Basic physics again. Same reason you see people smashing their faces and asses on facebook, complete lack of an awareness of basic reality. BRAVO!

Douglas
p.s. love a good laugh this early in the morning.

 

[evergreengardener]

Since the earth is rotating (see the “Foucault Pendulum” experiment for a definite proof, if you are doubtful), the consistent oval-shadow it produces in each and every lunar eclipse proves that the earth is not only round but spherical – absolutely, utterly, beyond a shadow of a doubt not flat

 

[Douglas.Curtis]

Still waiting for someone to explain the unsuited guy at 2 minutes into this spacewalk.

Get some glasses and a larger monitor. That's a mass of cables or hoses and then a f'ing KNEE in a spacesuit.

WOW! Talk about forging facts to fit your warped view of the world.

Douglas

 

[nobodies]

Get some glasses and a larger monitor. That's a mass of cables or hoses and then a f'ing KNEE in a spacesuit.

WOW! Talk about forging facts to fit your warped view of the world.

Douglas

Get a telescope, and look at every single other planet in our solar system. They are all round.

 

[Rrog]

Get some glasses and a larger monitor. That's a mass of cables or hoses and then a f'ing KNEE in a spacesuit.

WOW! Talk about forging facts to fit your warped view of the world.

Douglas

Exactly. JesusHChrist No naked man. Another astronaut in a space suit. Very, very clear.

All of these guys spout the same horsehit every 10 pages.

 

[Douglas.Curtis]

Get a telescope, and look at every single other planet in our solar system. They are all round.

Uh, I've used a 10" scope and I know they're round. Saturn looks freaking AWESOME with the naked eye through a scope. You're thinking of someone else in this thread who lacks awareness of physics. lol

Douglas

 

[Mellowman2112]

Since the earth is rotating (see the “Foucault Pendulum” experiment for a definite proof, if you are doubtful), the consistent oval-shadow it produces in each and every lunar eclipse proves that the earth is not only round but spherical – absolutely, utterly, beyond a shadow of a doubt not flat

No, because the same thing would happen as the moon and sun do not move at the same speeds, the sun on the flat earth model could easily be shining on the moon from 4000 miles up,

 

[Mellowman2112]

Uh, I've used a 10" scope and I know they're round. Saturn looks freaking AWESOME with the naked eye through a scope. You're thinking of someone else in this thread who lacks awareness of physics. lol

Douglas

Ok, let me get this straight. So they fake the moon-landing. They spent a fortune doing it. The best creative minds are devoted to getting everybody in the world to believe that they went to the moon....

But, they use something that looks like it was made as a grow tent to do it. Clearly, as you say, this thing could not get to the moon. So why would they use it? Why didn't they just make it look more substantial if their goal was to get people to believe?

The answer is, because it was sufficient to do the job! Because they did use it to land on the moon. Whatever your flawed sensory matrix tells you about how sturdy something has to be to do things in space, there are actual factual answers. When the engineers designed this thing, they did not give a fuck about how a tiny group of retards felt about how it looked. It just wasn't a consideration. Sorry. It was designed to actually land on the moon.

There is lots more evidence, look at the horizon 50 feet away. All the missions had the same short short horizon, as if they were in a studio. Look at the rover, no way they packed that thing onto the lander. the batteries alone weighed a ton in those days.

 

[Singlemalt]

Hey Mellow, did you ever explain why "the powers that be" would dedicate so much effort, obscene amounts of $$$$ and 1000's of years to perpetuate the spherical earth fraud?

 

[Douglas.Curtis]

There is lots more evidence, look at the horizon 50 feet away. All the missions had the same short short horizon, as if they were in a studio. Look at the rover, no way they packed that thing onto the lander. the batteries alone weighed a ton in those days.

I have had quite a few people hand me their "Fire" cannabis and I've not been able to choke it down, due to how horrible the quality is. You handing me 'facts' is pretty much the same experience. LOL

You make me believe you're doing this for sport, but I realize you're probably just 12 and on a phone under the covers. (would explain why you believe that's an unsuited face. lol)

Douglas

 

[Singlemalt]

I have had quite a few people hand me their "Fire" cannabis and I've not been able to choke it down, due to how horrible the quality is. You handing me 'facts' is pretty much the same experience. LOL

You make me believe you're doing this for sport, but I realize you're probably just 12 and on a phone under the covers. (would explain why you believe that's an unsuited face. lol)

Douglas

You are new here, he is doing this for sport and it's interspersed with Jew hating and white supremacy screeds. Note the time he came in today and check tonite, you'll see he spends the whole day here

 

[evergreengardener]

No, because the same thing would happen as the moon and sun do not move at the same speeds, the sun on the flat earth model could easily be shining on the moon from 4000 miles up,View attachment 3748485

Yea in theory it could but it wouldn't cast the curved shadows you see on the moon every night I tried to find the post that shows this but couldn't find it you've been shitted on in this thread for what seems like forever now.....

SERIOUSLY YOU ARE A PRIME EXAMPLE OF WHY YOU SHOULD STAY IN SCHOOL AND OFF OF DRUGS UNTIL YOUR ADULT YEARS

EDIT :changed the spelling of should dam touchscreens

 

[Rrog]

No, because the same thing would happen as the moon and sun do not move at the same speeds, the sun on the flat earth model could easily be shining on the moon from 4000 miles up,View attachment 3748485

This is not a correct statement. Once again you state shit

There is lots more evidence, ...

No, there is not a ton of "evidence." Just more pictures that are ALL VERY CLEARLY EXPLAINED

 

[Douglas.Curtis]

You are new here, he is doing this for sport and it's interspersed with Jew hating and white supremacy screeds. Note the time he came in today and check tonite, you'll see he spends the whole day here

I thought as much. New here, yet been on the net since '92 Appreciate the heads up.

 

[nobodies]

Uh, I've used a 10" scope and I know they're round. Saturn looks freaking AWESOME with the naked eye through a scope. You're thinking of someone else in this thread who lacks awareness of physics. lol

Douglas

Yea I didnt mean to quote you, I meant to hit reply.

 

[tyler.durden]

The comment about "The world has 2 poles!" was hilarious. Yes. I mean, what kid never got to play with pole magnets as a kid? I guess this one?

Basic physics again. Same reason you see people smashing their faces and asses on facebook, complete lack of an awareness of basic reality. BRAVO!

Douglas
p.s. love a good laugh this early in the morning.

He should have known this, as his dads have two poles...

 

[Singlemalt]

Ah jeez, now polack bashing? Mores the pity

 

[Rrog]

I just think it's particularly telling that he would use this double pole arguement when it is so cleanly and clearly explained with a 30 second Google

Obviously THEY don't fact- check the stream of BS they share amongst one another. So they review nothing and accept it even though the rest of the planet would argue them

This is statistically just stupid. Even PT Barnum didn't see this kinda dumb coming

 

[greasemonkeymann]

I just think it's particularly telling that he would use this double pole arguement when it is so cleanly and clearly explained with a 30 second Google

Obviously THEY don't fact- check the stream of BS they share amongst one another. So they review nothing and accept it even though the rest of the planet would argue them

This is statistically just stupid. Even PT Barnum didn't see this kinda dumb coming

you consistently amaze me at your involvement in this thread my man
Gotta hand it to ya.
you got patience