White Nationalist Warns of Multicultural Bloodbath if Trump Loses

[choomer]

<dead gif?>

Scott Foval ‏@Scott_Foval 10h10 hours ago

No one at the #DNC even likes you @HillaryClinton

Now THAT sounds like a bit of a meltdown, but he did vet the entire footage of himself and others in the Project Veritas investigation. I like the pic of him and Podesta @ a "team" meeting.

 

[Fogdog]

No I didn't.

I was alluding to the broken status of our system.
Hitlery gets away with things that have sent people to prison CONSISTENTLY, but not Hitlery.

IF she gets in the oval office (and the chances of that are VERY high no matter the vote count as we've seen from other partiality) it will be a sad day as it proves that this country has completely turned into oligarchy from the constitutional republic from which it was born.
Oligarchical taxation (to protect corony interests) is what spurred the active minority of colonial subjects to revolt and start a revolution.
She (deplorable person that she is) is not the reason, only the trigger that could make the quote from Thomas Jefferson, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." an ugly reality.

BTW...seems that the Hitlery/DNC machine has a malfunctioning (and recently fired) cog.

https://twitter.com/Scott_Foval/with_replies

.....W/ bon mots such as this:

Scott Foval ‏@Scott_Foval 8h8 hours ago

If voters start connecting our paid protesters & birddogging to the Baltimore Riots it could really hurt HRC huh Aaron @blackcatunloads

yeah but (insert fabrication here). Twenty five years of right wing BS and you guys keep using the same ploy that didn't work the first time. Absolutely bonkers

She will win tomorrow. And fuckers like you are all up about armed resistance. But you are a pussy and just talk that way because you have a gun. Fucking second amendment jerk. I support and will defend to the best of my ability the whole constitution and laws of this country. Which includes the peaceful transfer of power after an election. There is no "yeah but" to that fool.

 

[choomer]

I support and will defend to the best of my ability the whole constitution and laws of this country.<snip>There is no "yeah but" to that fool.

I didn't say "yeah, but", you did.
But about that 1st quoted sentence, you can say that with a straight face and still shill for Hellery?

25 years of "right wing" BS? The last 24 have had 16 years of democratic control of the white house.
Clit'n '92-'00
Shrub '00-'08
Obummer '08-'16

...and the house/senate breaks down like this:

Good numbers to support your :

Twenty five years of right wing BS and you guys keep using the same ploy that didn't work the first time. Absolutely bonkers

 

[Fogdog]

I didn't say "yeah, but", you did.
But about that 1st quoted sentence, you can say that with a straight face and still shill for Hellery?

25 years of "right wing" BS? The last 24 have had 16 years of democratic control of the white house.
Clit'n '92-'00
Shrub '00-'08
Obummer '08-'16

...and the house/senate breaks down like this:

Good numbers to support your :

25 years of Right wing BS attacks on Hillary Clinton. Yes, the congress has been controlled by Republicans for much of that time. Their leaders have been obsessed with using the same ugly approach to create scandals and investigations about Ms Clinton that went nowhere.. During that time, a Democratic President managed to get them to work with him to finally balance the budget. Which, Shrub completely obliterated. That same fucking Republican Party Congress obstructed Obama during the great recession they and Shrub created..

And you somehow think that occupying Congress and doing practically nothing other than obstruct and litigate is something to brag about?
Edit: not to mention your stated intent to take up arms against the US government when Ms Clinton wins.

Absolutely bonkers.

 

[UncleBuck]

I didn't say "yeah, but", you did.
But about that 1st quoted sentence, you can say that with a straight face and still shill for Hellery?

25 years of "right wing" BS? The last 24 have had 16 years of democratic control of the white house.
Clit'n '92-'00
Shrub '00-'08
Obummer '08-'16

...and the house/senate breaks down like this:

Good numbers to support your :

you are a loser and it will be proven tonight.

 

[choomer]

25 years of Right wing BS attacks on Hillary Clinton. Yes, the congress has been controlled by Republicans for much of that time. Their leaders have been obsessed with using the same ugly approach to create scandals and investigations about Ms Clinton that went nowhere.. During that time, a Democratic President managed to get them to work with him to finally balance the budget. Which, Shrub completely obliterated. That same fucking Republican Party Congress obstructed Obama during the great recession they and Shrub created..
And you somehow think that occupying Congress and doing practically nothing other than obstruct and litigate is something to brag about? Absolutely bonkers.

Again, you project that I must be a republican since I can't stomach an OBVIOUS proven criminal as the POTUS?
DC has been shoving dirt under the rug since there has been a DC and it hasn't been very noticeable to the american public until the heap under the rug suddenly grew to block the view of the TV and you blame the maid.
The maid has finally had enough and cleaned up all the dirt and transferred it to the bosses bed.

you are a loser and it will be proven tonight.

A candidate that I voted for to block the ascension of a career criminal to POTUS may lose (and if he does time will tell if we all do, or not) but I have better self identity and worth than to have to live vicariously through my political choice.

Too bad you can't say the same Buckold.

 

[UncleBuck]

Again, you project that I must be a republican since I can't stomach an OBVIOUS proven criminal as the POTUS?
DC has been sholving dirt under the rug since there has been a DC and it hasn't been very noticeable to the american public until the heap under the rug suddenly grew to block the view of the TV and you blame the maid.
The maid has finally had enough and cleaned up all the dirt and transferred it to the bosses bed.

A candidate that I voted for to block the ascension of a career criminal to POTUS may lose (and if he does time will tell if we all do, or not) but I have better self identity and worth than to have to live vicariously through my political choice.

Too bad you can't say the same Buckold.

 

[choomer]

Thank you for underscoring my point.

 

[UncleBuck]

Thank you for underscoring my point.

thank you for being a loser.

 

[Fogdog]

Again, you project that I must be a republican since I can't stomach an OBVIOUS proven criminal as the POTUS?
DC has been sholving dirt under the rug since there has been a DC and it hasn't been very noticeable to the american public until the heap under the rug suddenly grew to block the view of the TV and you blame the maid.
The maid has finally had enough and cleaned up all the dirt and transferred it to the bosses bed.

I don't know what sholving is. Must be a wing nut term and I'm not in on the jargon.

I think that your outcry to take up armed insurrection if "the wrong one", meaning Clinton, wins is a horrible cry to degrade this democracy.

 

[choomer]

thank you for being a loser.

Only in your eyes Buckold, which amounts to fuckall.

 

[UncleBuck]

Only in your eyes Buckold, which amounts to fuckall.

no, a racist birther conspiracy theorist like you is seen as a loser by everyone except his fellow racists, who are also losers.

 

[choomer]

I don't know what sholving is. Must be a wing nut term and I'm not in on the jargon.

Or it could just be a typo. Thanks for pointing that out. Seems I got caught between shoving and shoveling.
But I thought you were better than to let 1 word stop your understanding of the rest of it.
Well, I hoped anyway.

I think that your outcry to take up armed insurrection if "the wrong one", meaning Clinton, wins is a horrible cry to degrade this democracy.

While you and your cohorts keep trying to relabel our gov't as a democracy, it has, and hopefully will continue to be a constitutional republic.
A democracy is 2 wolves and 1 sheep voting on what's for dinner.

Remember grade school?
"....and to the republic for which it stands....."

 

[UncleBuck]

Or it could just be a typo. Thanks for pointing that out. Seems I got caught between shoving and shoveling.
But I thought you were better than to let 1 word stop your understanding of the rest of it.
Well, I hoped anyway.

While you and your cohorts keep trying to relabel our gov't as a democracy, it has, and hopefully will continue to be a constitutional republic.
A democracy is 2 wolves and 1 sheep voting on what's for dinner.

Remember grade school?
"....and to the republic for which it stands....."

 

[Fogdog]

Or it could just be a typo. Thanks for pointing that out. Seems I got caught between shoving and shoveling.
But I thought you were better than to let 1 word stop your understanding of the rest of it.
Well, I hoped anyway.

While you and your cohorts keep trying to relabel our gov't as a democracy, it has, and hopefully will continue to be a constitutional republic.
A democracy is 2 wolves and 1 sheep voting on what's for dinner.

Remember grade school?
"....and to the republic for which it stands....."

Remember that old fashioned US democratic ideal of peaceful transfer of power? This is a cornerstone of our democracy. I don't know why you and other wing nuts take armed insurrection so lightly. I guess because you only agree with democracy if the voters cast their ballots as you would. That's not democracy but you wouldn't understand, I guess.

In most places wolves are an endangered species and without protected status, they would be extinct. Sheep are doing just fine. Why are you so fearful?

 

[tangerinegreen555]

Thank you for underscoring my point.

choomer, who underscored your missing testicles?

 

[choomer]

Remember that old fashioned US democratic ideal of peaceful transfer of power? This is a cornerstone of our democracy. I don't know why you and other wing nuts take armed insurrection so lightly. I guess because you only agree with democracy if the voters cast their ballots as you would. That's not democracy but you wouldn't understand, I guess.
In most places wolves are an endangered species and without protected status, they would be extinct. Sheep are doing just fine. Why are you so fearful?

I cant' reason w/ such wantonly oblique idiocy.
But I can make fun of it.

I don't know too many domesticated wolves but I know a few sheep farmers (and it seems you're very familiar w/ them too) w/ herds of sheep.
The thing is a wolf lives free and may die because of it.
A sheep is cared for but routinely sheared of it's product up until the day it's slaughtered because that's all it is good for now.

 

[UncleBuck]

I cant' reason w/ such wantonly oblique idiocy.
But I can make fun of it.

I don't know too many domesticated wolves but I know a few sheep farmers (and it seems you're very familiar w/ them too) w/ herds of sheep.
The thing is a wolf lives free and may die because of it.
A sheep is cared for but routinely sheared of it's product up until the day it's slaughtered because that's all it is good for now.

 

[tangerinegreen555]

I cant' reason w/ such wantonly oblique idiocy.
But I can make fun of it.

I don't know too many domesticated wolves but I know a few sheep farmers (and it seems you're very familiar w/ them too) w/ herds of sheep.
The thing is a wolf lives free and may die because of it.
A sheep is cared for but routinely sheared of it's product up until the day it's slaughtered because that's all it is good for now.

 

[Fogdog]

I cant' reason w/ such wantonly oblique idiocy.
But I can make fun of it.

I don't know too many domesticated wolves but I know a few sheep farmers (and it seems you're very familiar w/ them too) w/ herds of sheep.
The thing is a wolf lives free and may die because of it.
A sheep is cared for but routinely sheared of it's product up until the day it's slaughtered because that's all it is good for now.

I don't know why you are so fearful about a species that has been hunted to near extinction. But then again, I don't know why you would take up arms just because you don't like the fact that a majority of voters did not agree with you.

You don't understand biology and evolution very well either. Sheep do well because they are tended and protected by the same species that has hunted those wolves to near extinction. A majority of that species is going to put Clinton in office. This group is doing best economically; it's better educated, healthy and diverse. Also more females. In biological science, diversity equates to robust, thriving populations. The weaker sub-group of this same species is failing to thrive and looking for a protector. It sounds like you have the sheep analogy backwards.