Russia didn't do it

Milliardo Peacecraft

Well-Known Member
My guess is that you don't understand how DKIM signatures work and how to verify them, and I don't really feel like elaborating.

Suffice it to say, the Podesta emails have been verified by containing a unique identity used by email systems to block spam. In order to spoof that signature, you'd have to somehow infiltrate google's records, and they'd definitely know if you did. Why would they be blaming Russia for hacking them if the emails weren't even real? Wouldn't they be blaming Russia for an elaborate hoax? You're a total nutter, and you're completely detached from reality.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
My guess is that you don't understand how DKIM signatures work and how to verify them, and I don't really feel like elaborating.

Suffice it to say, the Podesta emails have been verified by containing a unique identity used by email systems to block spam. In order to spoof that signature, you'd have to somehow infiltrate google's records, and they'd definitely know if you did. Why would they be blaming Russia for hacking them if the emails weren't even real? Wouldn't they be blaming Russia for an elaborate hoax? You're a total nutter, and you're completely detached from reality.
Hey clueless anime kid that lives with his mom, have you heard about the Drumpfster bathing in Russian hooker piss?

giphy (6).gif
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
My guess is that you don't understand how DKIM signatures work and how to verify them, and I don't really feel like elaborating.

Suffice it to say, the Podesta emails have been verified by containing a unique identity used by email systems to block spam. In order to spoof that signature, you'd have to somehow infiltrate google's records, and they'd definitely know if you did. Why would they be blaming Russia for hacking them if the emails weren't even real? Wouldn't they be blaming Russia for an elaborate hoax? You're a total nutter, and you're completely detached from reality.
we were talking about the guy you voted for registering 8 businesses in saudi arabia, not your compkete and utter inability to cite your claim that this russian propaganda was "verified authentic".

but nice try, loser.
 

Milliardo Peacecraft

Well-Known Member
we were talking about the guy you voted for registering 8 businesses in saudi arabia, not your compkete and utter inability to cite your claim that this russian propaganda was "verified authentic".

but nice try, loser.

hold up, hold up.

A. My candidate won.
B. You said that the emails weren't verifiable and Russian propaganda, the DKIM signatures say otherwise, you are wrong.
C. Registering a business under the auspice of your incorporated company doesn't amount to state level support, and your source is questionable.

Get blown out and change the subject again, you're an intellectual coward. All the bitching in the world isn't going to change the fact that Trump will be president, and you will never have another Clinton in the White House. Stop whining, no one likes a whiner. You aren't pushing anyone away from Trump, only yourself. You are a sad man on the internet who backed a losing, ideologically bankrupt horse. Move on or continue to writhe for the next eight years in your self-destructive moral vanity. Either way, I got exactly what I wanted; your agony is icing on my sweet, sweet cake.

Reminder: We've got Congress and the Supreme Court, too. Not only did your girl lose, you guys lost harder than you have in the last 100 years. You sir, are a verified loser.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
My candidate won.
when did i dispute that?

You said that the emails weren't verifiable and Russian propaganda, the DKIM signatures say otherwise, you are wrong.
you said their authenticity was verified in the report though.

page number and paragraph, please.

Registering a business under the auspice of your incorporated company doesn't amount to state level support, and your source is questionable.
the hill is a rock solid source and you said it is wrong to take money from saudi arabia. yet trump registered 8 businesses in saudi arabia while campaigning and while chastising hillary for taking money from the same and you are mute. like a dumb child.

and the kicker is that any money the clinton foundation got from saudi arabia went to a legitimate charity whereas the money trum gets from saudi arabia (and pays to saudi arabia) just goes into his tiny hands.

not to mention that trum's "charity" can't even be shut down because it is under criminal investigation for things like illegal bribes to pam bondi self-dealing, and never even being registered as a charity in the first place.

Not only did your girl lose, you guys lost harder than you have in the last 100 years.
trum's EV win ranks 46th out of 58 elections and he got as much of the popular vote as dukakis did.
 

Milliardo Peacecraft

Well-Known Member
Yeah, pizzagate is definitely real. A lot of it has become muddled in disinformation by controlled opposition hacks.

page number and paragraph, please.
The whole thing. Where in that report did it say they were falsified? They said "Russia involved in hacking", not "Russia involved in forging". You are a dolt. That's them saying: "the documents are real and were stolen from their originator". You want a pacifier too? Backpedal harder.

Having a business in Saudi isn't the same thing as accepting money from the Saudi government for a pay to play charity that's still under FBI investigation. Yes, the Clinton Foundation is still being investigated. A legitimate charity that pockets 90% of their donations while Clinton brokers the biggest arms deal in history with their country as SS. You're allowed to do business as a private individual, and especially as the CEO of an incorporated company. That isn't directly taking money and receiving the endorsement of the state. Keep squirming.

And Clinton's EV ranks..........
oh yeeeeeah that's riiiiight.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Yeah, pizzagate is definitely real. A lot of it has become muddled in disinformation by controlled opposition hacks.



The whole thing. Where in that report did it say they were falsified? They said "Russia involved in hacking", not "Russia involved in forging". You are a dolt. That's them saying: "the documents are real and were stolen from their originator". You want a pacifier too? Backpedal harder.

Having a business in Saudi isn't the same thing as accepting money from the Saudi government for a pay to play charity that's still under FBI investigation. Yes, the Clinton Foundation is still being investigated. A legitimate charity that pockets 90% of their donations while Clinton brokers the biggest arms deal in history with their country as SS. You're allowed to do business as a private individual, and especially as the CEO of an incorporated company. That isn't directly taking money and receiving the endorsement of the state. Keep squirming.

And Clinton's EV ranks..........
oh yeeeeeah that's riiiiight.
I forget... are you a flat earther too? 9/11 truther? Chemtrailer? Vaccination autism? So many stupid ideas to keep track of.
 
Top