UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i wonder why @chemphlegm changed his vote?
just wants to be a piece of shit but not be known as a piece of shit?
just wants to be a piece of shit but not be known as a piece of shit?
nope.. corn poop dicksWhat?
No lawyer memes??
Thanks but I've already eaten.nope.. corn poop dicks
nope, actually talked awhile with the wife, you know, of the female kind, and realized exactly what I felt. Originally I thought of this as a wife needing the permission of her husband to abort their baby, but then realized the bigger picture. Comprehende pendejo?i wonder why @chemphlegm changed his vote?
just wants to be a piece of shit but not be known as a piece of shit?
Completely oppose. The father had plenty of opportunities to place his reproductive in his own hands. If he fails at that simple thing, he deserves his fate.So if a woman gets pregnant, in order for her to legally have access to an abortion, she and the father would have to legally consent to it.
Would you support or oppose that?
So a better, more persuasive argument came along and you changed your position.nope, actually talked awhile with the wife, you know, of the female kind, and realized exactly what I felt. Originally I thought of this as a wife needing the permission of her husband to abort their baby, but then realized the bigger picture. Comprehende pendejo?
Rent Free in your head, 24/7 !!!
Didn't the mother also have the opportunity to place her reproduction in her own hands? If she fails at that simple thing, do you also believe she "deserves her fate"?Completely oppose. The father had plenty of opportunities to place his reproductive in his own hands. If he fails at that simple thing, he deserves his fate.
hello there, bitter MRA.Didn't the mother also have the opportunity to place her reproduction in her own hands? If she fails at that simple thing, do you also believe she "deserves her fate"?
That man should have wore a condom kids are expensive and it's a full time job raising a child until they go to school.There seems to be a potential inequity here.
What if a man wants the woman to abort and she refuses? Should the man then be made to use his body to labor for the upkeep of a child he didn't want ? If women own their bodies, don't men too?
As an answer to the original question. I am not in favor of a bill which requires the consent of the man. Although I do wonder if the "consent" of the unborn should be considered ?
wow.should the "consent" of the unborn should be considered ?
No. It's not the man's body. He has no say. He had a chance to prevent pregnancy: vasectomy, rubbers, whatever. But once conception takes place, the woman has all the say. It's HER body, NOT the man's. Have you always been this stupid, or did you have to take a class?Didn't the mother also have the opportunity to place her reproduction in her own hands? If she fails at that simple thing, do you also believe she "deserves her fate"?
Too bad. Should have stuck his dick in someone who wanted a kid.I agree it should be legal for a woman to have one. I also think that the mans permission shouldn't be needed.
What if the man wants the kid?
That doesn't bring anything to the discussion. You know it doesn't.Too bad. Should have stuck his dick in someone who wanted a kid.
then the dude is SOL.What if two people agree to kids and then the woman decides not to have it?
Then they don't have kids. There is NO discussion. The woman has the say, once conception takes place. What is there to discuss? Men have ALL the control, until they give it up. Once given up, they rarely get it back. That's LIFE. Is it fair? Maybe not, but until men can carry pregnancies to term (yeah, right), once they jizz in the cooter, it's up to the woman.That doesn't bring anything to the discussion. You know it doesn't.
Just saying. What if two people agree to kids and then the woman decides not to have it?