well shit, I sure hope not, cuz i'm fairly certain I use more comfrey than probably anyone else..
that's a very interesting thought, I did a lil research on the tests done on lab rats and here is a copy and paste, sorta reassuring considering..
but it looks as though one would have to consume a metric-fuck-ton of comfrey to do that... between 7 and 1040 kgs??!
that's like 15 lbs to us americans... or 1040kgs??
that's over a ton....
and that's actually eating it too, so I would speculate that it's alright in the cannabis, also considering that you have t literally ingest it via eating..
again, speculating here, but i'd say the alkaloids would likely be lessened, if not destroyed via the whole pyrolictic process of smoking
hope so anyways...
heres the copy/paste
In an experiment that ran for 21 weeks males rats were given 13 mg/kg i.p. twice weekly for 4 weeks and then once a week for 52 weeks. One rat out of twenty developed liver cell adenoma and three rats out of twenty developed hemanagioendothelial sarcomas of the liver. All of the animals displayed megalocytosis in the liver. In order to relate this to human risk an equivalent dose for a 60 kg human has been estimated
(table 5).
In order to receive an equivalent dose of symphytine one would need to consume between 7 and 1040kg of dry leaf, assuming 5% of comfrey PA is symphytine [65] and the variability of PA concentrations in leaf as given in Table 2. An alternate way of estimating the equivalent dose would be to consider all the alkaloids in comfrey to be of equal carcinogenic potential (not probable). The dose administered then would be equivalent to 350g to 52 kg dry leaf. Given a typical therapeutic dose to be about 5g/day it is easy to conclude that the results of this study can not be used it to determine human risk, as levels are 100 to 10,000 times greater in the rat study.