TacoMac
Well-Known Member
I was there last weekend. I knew two of them.what a retard you are.
remember how it was a white christian that shot those 9 black people dead in church as they prayed?
I was there last weekend. I knew two of them.what a retard you are.
remember how it was a white christian that shot those 9 black people dead in church as they prayed?
*part and partialcould you two possibly be more cucked?
clearly he said the western world, not the united states, which is only part and parcel to the western world.
your worldviews are tiny.
LOLyou need help finding the libertarian platform? it's non-negotiable, like my currency is.
very much unlike you post modern Marxists posing as democrats and the republicans which are Democrat lites.
the neo-nazis and trump supporters on this forum just ignore their deaths at the hands of a white terrorist who was radicalized by conservative groups and online racist websites because it does not fit the agenda they have among their conservative groups and online racist websites.I was there last weekend. I knew two of them.
he didn't use to be, he used to be pretty far right. but the republican party decided to coddle nazis and klanheads, so now he is.LOL
You are really going to call me a communist? How archaic.
Face it, you are a status quo Republican. About the worst thing anybody can be called. And its true.
So you too are subscribing to @undercovergrow 's idea thatcould you two possibly be more cucked?
clearly he said the western world, not the united states, which is only part and parcel to the western world.
your worldviews are tiny.
i can just see the fedora you're wearing based on that pic, fat boi.who cares? I can't even see my sig on this phone because I have a actual life unlike yourself:
View attachment 3968091
great day to fly.
basic income is actully welfare. food stamps are welfare and tax deductions are welfare.Children count for welfare, food stamps and tax deductions, why not basic income? They eat and need shelter, services like education and healthcare.
no, they don't have to have an income to make zero. zero is still less than 30k .You mixed up your input numbers. Children don't work and so don't make 30k per year. The median income in 2015 was 35k, but that's a small error compared to your assumption that every man woman and child have an income.
People who don't earn an income aren't wage earners. The statistic you quote is "median personal income" of people who earn one. I don't even know what to call what you are referring to but it would be a lot less than 30k.no, they don't have to have an income to make zero. zero is still less than 30k .
what numbers are mixed up?
This is your life? Seriously? I should have figured.who cares? I can't even see my sig on this phone because I have a actual life unlike yourself:
View attachment 3968091
great day to fly.
what purpose does it serve to give the wealthy more money? why do you "have to make it universal"?I didnt run your numbers but at face value you could definitely tax them more than that individually...
No-one opposes the wealthier paying more, it's the smash and grab tactics by some on the ridiculous left that most people oppose.
You have to make the payment universal though, so count that into your math and increase taxes accordingly.
I'll give you a hint...what purpose does it serve to give the wealthy more money? why do you "have to make it universal"?
enough people oppose having the rich pay more. hence , they don't.
what smash and grab tactics? sounds like propaganda against having the rich pay taxes.
You know what's amazing?the neo-nazis and trump supporters on this forum just ignore their deaths at the hands of a white terrorist who was radicalized by conservative groups and online racist websites because it does not fit the agenda they have among their conservative groups and online racist websites.
Nah it's part and parcel...*part and partial
Its not as if the wealthy would go to a hospital for the hoi polloi anyway.I'll give you a hint...
Its symbolism, you give it to them with one hand and take many times more with the other.
Its based on the principle that everyone gets it, hence "universal".
i i was using the top 1% to cover half the total pop . 159 million is half the pop not half the earners. everyone under 30k including kids can be easily covered by taxing to top 2 % wealthiest . everyone including kids living ff of less than 30 k is just over 50% of the total pop.People who don't earn an income aren't wage earners. The statistic you quote is "median income" of people who earn one. I don't even know what to call what you are referring to but it would be a lot less than 30k.
idk talk to your shrink. don't let the va talk you into painkillers to prop up Afghan poppies either.Seriously? You think I'm fronting? Why would I have to feel like I need to?