moonofalabama's greatest hits

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It is astonishing that THE media outlet that did the most to shine lights on Clinton is ignored in any of the main stream after-election reporting. I am talking of Wikileaks and Julian Assange who did their very best, under high personal risk, to report the truth about Clinton's and the DNC's utter corruption. A big thank you to them!

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html






another word would be treason but whatevs
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
It is astonishing that THE media outlet that did the most to shine lights on Clinton is ignored in any of the main stream after-election reporting. I am talking of Wikileaks and Julian Assange who did their very best, under high personal risk, to report the truth about Clinton's and the DNC's utter corruption. A big thank you to them!

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html






another word would be treason but whatevs
Lol

Look who just went Republican, folks!
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
With Trump the U.S. would get a president who is a pretty unknown factor but, in my judgment, a less dangerous one to the U.S. and the world than Clinton.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html







nailed it
And so far, so good; the Chump hasn't been able to get much done relative to what a seasoned political operator might accomplish.

I think Mrs Clinton would have started more wars and killed more Innocents by now.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Some Rogers trusted dudes at the NSA (or in the Navy cyber arm which Rogers earlier led) hack into the DNC, Podesta emails and the Clinton private email server. An easy job with the tools the NSA provides for its spies. Whoever hacked the emails then pushes what they got to Wikileaks (and DCleaks, another "leak" outlet). Wikileaks publishes what it gets because that is what it usually does. Assange also has various reasons to hate Clinton. She was always very hostile to Wikileaks. She allegedly even mused of killing Assange by a drone strike.

Rogers then accuses Russia of the breach even while the rest of the spying community finds no evidence for such a claim. That is natural to do for a military man who grew up during the cold war and may wish that war (and its budgets) back. It is also a red herring that will never be proven wrong or right unless the original culprit is somehow found.

Next we know - Trump offers Rogers the Clapper job. He would replace the boss that wanted him fired.

Rogers support for the new cold war will also gain him favor with the various weapon industries which will eventually beef up his pension.

Some of the above is speculation. But it would make sense and explain the quite one-sided wave of leaks we saw during this election cycle.



http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/11/index.html








nailed it so hard. totally not a ridiculous conspiracy theory
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Top