I disagree with the general sentiment that high humidity is bad. If that were the case, we wouldn't have Thai, Vietnamese, or Laotian cultivars (among others).
High humidity is bad for the vast majority of the cannabis gene pool, especially the cultivars of modern day that are so popular. We have the Asian varieties you speak of because of localized evolution. They acclimatized over time. Of the cannabis gene pool they were the only lines in that region that could survive so they exist and they exist in the state they are in. The cultivars you speak of all have terribly loose, stringy, fluffy, and airy buds. 95-99% I would say when grown out are complete hemp garbage compared to the vast majority of cannabis worked or unworked. Working Thai strains and a lot of Asian varieties is a fucking night mare. Fantastic small population of good specimens though.
The only thing sought after in the varieties you mentioned are terp profile, humidity/mold/mildew resistance, and high. Very important things no doubt, but far from sought after strains as a whole compared to the rest of the planet.
By your theory high humidity is awesome for plants. So lets see you grow the top 10 popular and most sought after cultivars in high humidity and let us all know how awesome their performance is compared to a controlled environment with a balanced humidity.
Hell lets see you do that with the top 500 in the past 30 years of cannabis breeding.
Comon now lets be serious here...
High humidity with low temps is bad. High humidity in late stages with certain varieties is bad. Higher temps call for higher humidity in my experience.
Yeah there is some truth here higher temps = more evaporation and loss of water. But how successful is growing extremely thick tight buds or even moderate in Florida? I can tell you from first hand experience the vast majority of the time it is not good...Very dependent on genes though. The stringy fluffy sativas do great....