Sarah Sanders: ‘It Is VERY Biblical To Enforce The Law’

Sir Napsalot

Well-Known Member
Check out Griffith Park Observatory. They have a huge telescope you can look through at 7 pm nightly for free and see the moon surface and Jupiter up close. Also many things in the museum to check out. My favorite was the elements installation. They had the rocks of the elements in chart locations on view on the wall in little squares that would light up.
Gallium, indium ,molybdenum and fluorine were my favorites.
View attachment 4152466

We went there in ~1964
 

zeddd

Well-Known Member
the universe won't make it that long, it will start collapsing back into it's center before too long ( cosmically speaking) and when the mass at the center of the universe gets dense enough, it will implode, and it all starts over again....
Yet the evidence from red shift studies imply that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, the farther away the greater the acceleration. The cause of this effect is explained as a phenomenon called dark energy, your turn
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Yet the evidence from red shift studies imply that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, the farther away the greater the acceleration. The cause of this effect is explained as a phenomenon called dark energy, your turn
Calling it anything is a bit pointless, its a mathematically observable but unknown force.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Calling it anything is a bit pointless, its a mathematically observable but unknown force.
the farther away something gets from the center of the universe, the less the gravity from all the mass behind it effects it? first thing that popped into my mind, sounds as plausible as dark matter....
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
the farther away something gets from the center of the universe, the less the gravity from all the mass behind it effects it? first thing that popped into my mind, sounds as plausible as dark matter....
^except the universe's rate of expansion is accelerating. Energy has to be applied to accelerate mass. We don't detect or "see" anything to account for this, hence, dark energy.

If it were simply less gravitational force over time, the universe might still expand but it would be at a decelerating rate until the force of gravity becomes effectively zero. Then the universe would expand at a constant rate.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
^except the universe's rate of expansion is accelerating. Energy has to be applied to accelerate mass. We don't detect or "see" anything to account for this, hence, dark energy.

If it were simply less gravitational force over time, the universe might still expand but it would be at a decelerating rate until the force of gravity becomes effectively zero. Then the universe would expand at a constant rate.
All speculation though, because what's just beyond the expansion "wave"?

There could be a source of extreme gravity outside our "universe" in the unknown.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
All speculation though, because what's just beyond the expansion "wave"?

There could be a source of extreme gravity outside our "universe" in the unknown.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/watch-live-today-a-bold-new-view-of-gravity/

^^An interesting lecture that pretty much says Einstien's and other's theories of the universe and gravity are based upon a teensy fraction of all the information available and therefore incomplete. The lecturer showed that discrepancies between observations and Einstein's theory are currently summed up in fudge factors that are many times larger larger than all the observable energy or matter in the universe. Whether the lecturer's theory is correct or not, he makes the case that explaining the accelerating expansion of the universe and so-called dark energy or matter takes a new theory beyond Einstein's. He gives the audience an idea of what that may be at the beginning and at the end of his lecture.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/watch-live-today-a-bold-new-view-of-gravity/

^^An interesting lecture that pretty much says Einstien's and other's theories of the universe and gravity are based upon a teensy fraction of all the information available and therefore incomplete. The lecturer showed that discrepancies between observations and Einstein's theory are currently summed up in fudge factors that are many times larger larger than all the observable energy or matter in the universe. Whether the lecturer's theory is correct or not, he makes the case that explaining the accelerating expansion of the universe and so-called dark energy or matter requires new theory beyond Einstein's.
Interestingly enough dark energy and dark matter are actually completely separate things.

Dark matter is a source of mass that isn't directly observable by any of our current detection methods but is observable by it's effect on other bodies.

Dark energy is thought to be related to vacuum energy, which is quantum stuff and too complicated to summarize concisely and to be honest, I get the rough concept but amnt even remotely qualified to try explain it to someone else.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Interestingly enough dark energy and dark matter are actually completely separate things.

Dark matter is a source of mass that isn't directly observable by any of our current detection methods but is observable by it's effect on other bodies.

Dark energy is thought to be related to vacuum energy, which is quantum stuff and too complicated to summarize concisely and to be honest, I get the rough concept but amnt even remotely qualified to try explain it to someone else.
Me neither. That presentation I linked to is by a lecturer who is qualified to explain to somebody else.
 

kkt3

Well-Known Member
on separating children from parent at the border.

What a cunt BIBLICAL how does she live with herself..what kind of mother is she?

In other creepy news:

‘He speaks and everyone sits up at attention, that’s what I want’ -Trump on KJU
Many years ago I watched a show called World at War. I found it a fascinating documentary about wartime. Watching and seeing the shocking scenes of death and destruction was quite difficult at times. Then one episode came on and I watched. Don’t remember how far into it I stopped. But what I saw has made me never to this day watch it again. The Nazis were filing people thru a fence and then one of them grabbed a young girl, probably 4 or 5, and forceably pushed her away from her Mother towards the other side of the fence. Even as I type this probably 35 years later, I still can’t believe there are monsters like that.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
But what I saw has made me never to this day watch it again. The Nazis were filing people thru a fence and then one of them grabbed a young girl, probably 4 or 5, and forceably pushed her away from her Mother towards the other side of the fence. Even as I type this probably 35 years later, I still can’t believe there are monsters like that.
If separating a child from her mother was too hard to watch it’s definitely a good thing you stopped at that point and didn’t see where both mom and child ended up.

 
Top