Civil Discourse

Status
Not open for further replies.

MichiganSpinDoctor

Well-Known Member
Ron Paul was a raving racist who published reams of essays in support of white nationalism and white supremacy.
He is alive today, and no, he is not. He has disavowed those publications. He was the only anti war, anti drug war, anti IRS, audit the fed, sound money candidate.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
He is alive today, and no, he is not. He has disavowed those publications. He was the only anti war, anti drug war, anti IRS, audit the fed, sound money candidate.
You claim he disavowed those publications but the link you posted as "proof" said nothing of the sort.

It just said he didn't write the articles -- that were published in a newsletter carrying his name and that he owned -- himself. Oh and it was a long time ago. That does not fit the meaning of the word "disavow".

dis·a·vow
ˌdisəˈvou/
verb
  1. deny any responsibility or support for.
    "he appears to be in denial of his own past, which he continually disavows"
    synonyms: deny, disclaim, disown, wash one's hands of, repudiate, reject, renounce
    "the chairman disavowed the press release"
Ron Paul never denied his responsibility or support for those articles.
 

MichiganSpinDoctor

Well-Known Member
Your argument isn't very convincing.

But please do list reasons why mainstream media is left leaning. How about if yoou start with AP, Reuters, AFP, Bloomberg, CBS and NBC. Also please show us how the Weekly Standard and the Wall Street Journal are left leaning.

Here's a good outline for your first paragon of journalism, the ap. This is from a former journalist.

I am getting extremely tired of your continued use of the left-leaning Associated Press as the main source for your stories about President Trump. You claim that AP is unbiased but the stories you print about our President always leave a bad taste in the mouth.

As a writer and former journalist I'll give you some examples. Headline: "President launches commission to investigate UNSUBSTANTIATED voter fraud." (My emphasis) Result = negative toward Mr. Trump. Since there are many reports substantiating the claim that over 800,000 and up to 2 million illegal aliens voted in California alone, an unbiased headline would read "President Trump launches commission to study REPORTED voter fraud.

Another headline on the same page: "Acting FBI head undercuts Trump claims on probe." CNN reports it that way but Mr. McCabe actually said that Comey's claim that he had asked for more money to continue the "Russian" probe is patently false. And it goes on and on.


I never saw this kind of negativity when the socialist Barack Obama was in power. But given the fact that Journalism students in our major universities are liberal (socialist) by a 20 to 1 margin, it is understandable. And given the fact that you guys constantly print stories containing grammatical errors and misuse of the language (see caption about the ship that "was sank" 133 miles off the New Jersey coast) It's not surprising that your level of reporting is also sophomoric.

My hint to the editors and publishers of this paper—Idaho is a conservative state, we voted for Mr. Trump by a large margin. Stop using the leftist AP as your main source in your efforts to belittle him.

Here's another hint: Most people read your paper only because it's the only choice over the Gannett owned and truly socialist Idaho Statesman.


Patrick Craig, Caldwell

Editor's Note: The Idaho Statesman is owned by McClatchy.
 

MichiganSpinDoctor

Well-Known Member
You claim he disavowed those publications but the link you posted as "proof" said nothing of the sort.

It just said he didn't write the articles -- that were published in a newsletter carrying his name and that he owned -- himself. Oh and it was a long time ago. That does not fit the meaning of the word "disavow".

dis·a·vow
ˌdisəˈvou/
verb
  1. deny any responsibility or support for.
    "he appears to be in denial of his own past, which he continually disavows"
    synonyms: deny, disclaim, disown, wash one's hands of, repudiate, reject, renounce
    "the chairman disavowed the press release"
Ron Paul never denied his responsibility or support for those articles.
Yes he did. Over and over and over. Some folks can't take it for an answer.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Here's a good outline for your first paragon of journalism, the ap. This is from a former journalist.

I am getting extremely tired of your continued use of the left-leaning Associated Press as the main source for your stories about President Trump. You claim that AP is unbiased but the stories you print about our President always leave a bad taste in the mouth.

As a writer and former journalist I'll give you some examples. Headline: "President launches commission to investigate UNSUBSTANTIATED voter fraud." (My emphasis) Result = negative toward Mr. Trump. Since there are many reports substantiating the claim that over 800,000 and up to 2 million illegal aliens voted in California alone, an unbiased headline would read "President Trump launches commission to study REPORTED voter fraud.

Another headline on the same page: "Acting FBI head undercuts Trump claims on probe." CNN reports it that way but Mr. McCabe actually said that Comey's claim that he had asked for more money to continue the "Russian" probe is patently false. And it goes on and on.


I never saw this kind of negativity when the socialist Barack Obama was in power. But given the fact that Journalism students in our major universities are liberal (socialist) by a 20 to 1 margin, it is understandable. And given the fact that you guys constantly print stories containing grammatical errors and misuse of the language (see caption about the ship that "was sank" 133 miles off the New Jersey coast) It's not surprising that your level of reporting is also sophomoric.

My hint to the editors and publishers of this paper—Idaho is a conservative state, we voted for Mr. Trump by a large margin. Stop using the leftist AP as your main source in your efforts to belittle him.

Here's another hint: Most people read your paper only because it's the only choice over the Gannett owned and truly socialist Idaho Statesman.


Patrick Craig, Caldwell

Editor's Note: The Idaho Statesman is owned by McClatchy.
One letter to the editor is proof that the AP is left-biased?

Your argument is not very convincing.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
But if someone murders a pregnant woman they are charged with two murders. A social security number does not make a life, a heartbeat does. I am neither pro life or pro abortion. But I do believe a heartbeat deserves some consideration. It is a very slippery slope.
Nope, they are charged with homicide and feticide
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
Oh, Hi!!!

Hey, I asked you a question earlier and I guess you were so busy defending your faith, white power and Thor that you just forgot to answer.

What is it that alt.right, KKK and Proud Boys protest FOR? What wrongs are they demonstrating to have made right?
I already directed you at Thor. Pray to him for answers. They concern you not me. I pray to Buddha, not Thor. I also think the alt-right are loons along with alt-left antifa loons like you. But enough here laugh at the altright so I'm covered. There isn't enough laughing at alt-lefters, so I generously volunteered. You're welcome.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He is alive today, and no, he is not. He has disavowed those publications. He was the only anti war, anti drug war, anti IRS, audit the fed, sound money candidate.
Did he ever return the money from those racist newsletters?

Why did he post that ultra racist cultural Marxism picture the other day?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Here's a good outline for your first paragon of journalism, the ap. This is from a former journalist.

I am getting extremely tired of your continued use of the left-leaning Associated Press as the main source for your stories about President Trump. You claim that AP is unbiased but the stories you print about our President always leave a bad taste in the mouth.

As a writer and former journalist I'll give you some examples. Headline: "President launches commission to investigate UNSUBSTANTIATED voter fraud." (My emphasis) Result = negative toward Mr. Trump. Since there are many reports substantiating the claim that over 800,000 and up to 2 million illegal aliens voted in California alone, an unbiased headline would read "President Trump launches commission to study REPORTED voter fraud.

Another headline on the same page: "Acting FBI head undercuts Trump claims on probe." CNN reports it that way but Mr. McCabe actually said that Comey's claim that he had asked for more money to continue the "Russian" probe is patently false. And it goes on and on.


I never saw this kind of negativity when the socialist Barack Obama was in power. But given the fact that Journalism students in our major universities are liberal (socialist) by a 20 to 1 margin, it is understandable. And given the fact that you guys constantly print stories containing grammatical errors and misuse of the language (see caption about the ship that "was sank" 133 miles off the New Jersey coast) It's not surprising that your level of reporting is also sophomoric.

My hint to the editors and publishers of this paper—Idaho is a conservative state, we voted for Mr. Trump by a large margin. Stop using the leftist AP as your main source in your efforts to belittle him.

Here's another hint: Most people read your paper only because it's the only choice over the Gannett owned and truly socialist Idaho Statesman.


Patrick Craig, Caldwell

Editor's Note: The Idaho Statesman is owned by McClatchy.
His commission didn’t find any voter fraud though

Why do you constantly spew white nationalist rhetoric?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I already directed you at Thor. Pray to him for answers. They concern you not me. I pray to Buddha, not Thor. I also think the alt-right are loons along with alt-left antifa loons like you. But enough here laugh at the altright so I'm covered. There isn't enough laughing at alt-lefters, so I generously volunteered. You're welcome.
You are the RIU resident expert on white pride, white power, reverse discrimination, media bias and gas from eating too much broccoli. As such you have the best perspective of what the alt.right boys think they are doing at their demonstrations, most of which involves their violent acts.

I am looking for a good objective reason as to why the white power groups feel the need to drive for hundreds of miles, some even flying in from Florida to march about and project white power. What is is that they are protesting for?
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
You are the RIU resident expert on white pride, white power, reverse discrimination, media bias and gas from eating too much broccoli. As such you have the best perspective of what the alt.right boys think they are doing at their demonstrations, most of which involves their violent acts.

I am looking for a good objective reason as to why the white power groups feel the need to drive for hundreds of miles, some even flying in from Florida to march about and project white power. What is is that they are protesting for?
I already answered. Please refer.

The problem is clinging to any emotion. For some reason they feel unhappy. Being happy comes of it's own. When you force an emotion, for a while you can delude yourself, especially from outside forces you have no control over. Happiness comes from within not the outside world.

Emotions of all kinds flow in a person. The trick is to ride them out and not fight it. Eventually after letting go you become liberated and feel the qi. A feeling of bliss and well being comes. Nothing bothers you.

People make life out to be much harder than it is because they have preconceived notions about how things should be rather than accepting how things really are.
 

Stink Bug

Well-Known Member
You are the RIU resident expert on white pride, white power, reverse discrimination, media bias and gas from eating too much broccoli. As such you have the best perspective of what the alt.right boys think they are doing at their demonstrations, most of which involves their violent acts.

I am looking for a good objective reason as to why the white power groups feel the need to drive for hundreds of miles, some even flying in from Florida to march about and project white power. What is is that they are protesting for?
At least they are not paid and bussed in to protest. The extreme WS are easily dealt with. Just as the extreme liberals are. Just ignore them. When the attention goes away so do they.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I already answered. Please refer.
You see, there are these white supremacists who keep showing up in Portland to demonstrate. They don't live here. Most don't even live in Oregon. As an alt.right boy yourself, I'm asking what you and your kind are protesting FOR?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
At least they are not paid and bussed in to protest. The extreme WS are easily dealt with. Just as the extreme liberals are. Just ignore them. When the attention goes away so do they.
Why would we ignore nazis like you instead of violently crushing them with overwhelming force?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top