Khashoggi wasn’t murdered,he died in a fist fight!

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Hate speech is protected by the first amendment.
It is and it isn't.

Speech critical or insulting to someone is. Speech calling for or advocating for violence on someone or a group is not.

However, here in Georgia, it is not. Hate speech is categorized as "fighting words". You utter them, you are going to get your ass kicked...and there will be absolutely nothing you can do about it legally.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
I'll do one better. Here's republicans doing to her what she called for. She called for "collateral damage" so people responded. I know, the republicans here are wrong, but here ya go.

LMMFAO!!!

Are you kidding me with that bullshit?!?!

You have to be. You just have to be. NOBODY is that fucking stupid.

Here is the actual sentence:

“We owe the American people to be there for them, for their financial security, respecting the dignity and worth of every person in our country, and if there is some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it, but it shouldn’t be our original purpose,” she said Sunday.

Her commentary came against a political backdrop in which the U.S. unemployment rate is at a 49-year low — 3.7 percent — in conjunction with moderate inflation.


She was referring to FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC COLLATERAL DAMAGE you fuckwit - namely that the wealthy (of which she is one of them) would have to foot the bill to pay for it.

Physical violence wasn't even mentioned at any point at all. Source: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/18/nancy-pelosi-on-the-collateral-damage-of-dems-econ/
 
LMMFAO!!!

Are you kidding me with that bullshit?!?!

You have to be. You just have to be. NOBODY is that fucking stupid.

Here is the actual sentence:

“We owe the American people to be there for them, for their financial security, respecting the dignity and worth of every person in our country, and if there is some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it, but it shouldn’t be our original purpose,” she said Sunday.

Her commentary came against a political backdrop in which the U.S. unemployment rate is at a 49-year low — 3.7 percent — in conjunction with moderate inflation.


She was referring to FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC COLLATERAL DAMAGE you fuckwit.

Physical violence wasn't even mentioned at any point at all. Source: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/18/nancy-pelosi-on-the-collateral-damage-of-dems-econ/
Sure. Financial collateral damage. Sure.
 
Top