Fire Kelly Johnstone or Boycott Campbell's Soup

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I am discriminating against the poor by not giving them a billion dollars so they can harbor the most radical elements in society. You poor thing.

Schuylaar isn't a Nazi, she's racist. All Nazis are racist but only some racists are Nazis. I didn't make her post racist comments.
Forcing your ideals on others, makes a person a facist, because they're ideals not moral absolutes.

Just because I think your view of relativism makes you an idiot, doesn't mean you don't need compassion.

For being a party of compassion, it's quite "ironic" you're least compassionate to those who need it most.

The problem is identifying what's moral. Take for instance slavery. Practically no one would condone it now. But that wasn't always the case. We shouldn't retroactively condemn those who did in the past because the issue wasn't settled. Yet that's exactly what your side does.

But that doesn't mean we should take a relativistic stance on slavery. We need to condone the actual practice, but have compaasion those who did it weren't "enlightened" enough.

One day we'll finally realize eating animals is an incompassionate act. Like how cats and dogs are illegal to eat, because we realize they're our companions or for some "pets." But even our "food" have the same characteristics but unfortunately lack the PR cats and dogs take for granted.

When that day comes morals you hold dear are condemned in the future, you better hope my vision of values of compassion come about, rather than yours of judging the past bases upon the present.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Forcing your ideals on others, makes a person a facist, because they're ideals not moral absolutes.

Just because I think your view of relativism makes you an idiot, doesn't mean you don't need compassion.

For being a party of compassion, it's quite "ironic" you're least compassionate to those who need it most.

The problem is identifying what's moral. Take for instance slavery. Practically no one would condone it now. But that wasn't always the case. We shouldn't retroactively condemn those who did in the past because the issue wasn't settled. Yet that's exactly what your side does.

But that doesn't mean we should take a relativistic stance on slavery. We need to condone the actual practice, but have compaasion those who did it weren't "enlightened" enough.

One day we'll finally realize eating animals is an incompassionate act. Like how cats and dogs are illegal to eat, because we realize they're our companions or for some "pets." But even our "food" have the same characteristics but unfortunately lack the PR cats and dogs take for granted.

When that day comes morals you hold dear are condemned in the future, you better hope my vision of values of compassion come about, rather than yours of judging the past bases upon the present.
“Stop making me a nazi fascist by advocating for higher marginal tax rates on the wealthy!”
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
You are actually the one who is in complete control of how you get labeled

You have chosen to be a racist alt right nazi so you get labeled accordingly
You're the one who's closer to the Nazi end of the spectrum. You stated how you rejected full out legalization because "medical" marijuana makes your "product" worth more, and completely legal weed would make growing too expensive.

Which you've found out living currently in Colorado.

I think capitalism is an abomination upon humanity. You happily accept it, but want an authoritarian government to protect your causes, and interefere with those which cause you threat, because you realize the same, and are deluded into thinking it can be tamed to serve your will.

But capitalism is a wild animal who only knows serving the highest bidder, and once your "protectors" in government are offered enough capital bribes, they'll have no moral qualms betraying your causes.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
[cramming jews into the ovens]

You made me do this when you voted for a payroll tax cut for families making 150% of poverty or less
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You're the one who's closer to the Nazi end of the spectrum. You stated how you rejected full out legalization because "medical" marijuana makes your "product" worth more, and completely legal weed would make growing too expensive.

Which you've found out living currently in Colorado.

I think capitalism is an abomination upon humanity. You happily accept it, but want an authoritarian government to protect your causes, and interefere with those which cause you threat, because you realize the same, and are deluded into thinking it can be tamed to serve your will.

But capitalism is a wild animal who only knows serving the highest bidder, and once your "protectors" in government are offered enough capital bribes, they'll have no moral qualms betraying your causes.
[finishes white genocide meme depicting George soros with lizard tail]

Really it’s you who’s the nazi
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
“Stop making me a nazi fascist by advocating for higher marginal tax rates on the wealthy!”
I advocate nothing of the sort. Nothing would make me happier than seeing Trump losing everything and living on the streets for a few years to help him realize how much of a greedy asshole he is.

I also advocate such on Oprah, Zuckerberg, Gates, and Buffet to have the same happen. Unlike you their politics has no bearing upon how I view them.

Billionaires pick sides to appeal to a certain group, not because they agree. It's all a facade to gain more capital and build image empire. Essentially all billionaires all agree, exploiting those who are weaker.

Proof is Kellogs that sells many products from factory farms that torture animals because it's cheaper than being humane. They own Morning Star which advocates meatless compassionate alternatives. But the company is full of shit and only sells those products to accommodate fools that believe such a lie
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I advocate nothing of the sort. Nothing would make me happier than seeing Trump losing everything and living on the streets for a few years to help him realize how much of a greedy asshole he is.

I also advocate such on Oprah, Zuckerberg, Gates, and Buffet to have the same happen. Unlike you their politics has no bearing upon how I view them.

Billionaires pick sides to appeal to a certain group, not because they agree. It's all a facade to gain more capital and build image empire. Essentially all billionaires all agree, exploiting those who are weaker.

Proof is Kellogs that sells many products from factory farms that torture animals because it's cheaper than being humane. They own Morning Star which advocates meatless compassionate alternatives. But the company is full of shit and only sells those products to accommodate fools that believe such a lie
You just tried to blame liberals being liberal for your descent into nazism
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Forcing your ideals on others, makes a person a facist, because they're ideals not moral absolutes.

Just because I think your view of relativism makes you an idiot, doesn't mean you don't need compassion.

For being a party of compassion, it's quite "ironic" you're least compassionate to those who need it most.

The problem is identifying what's moral. Take for instance slavery. Practically no one would condone it now. But that wasn't always the case. We shouldn't retroactively condemn those who did in the past because the issue wasn't settled. Yet that's exactly what your side does.

But that doesn't mean we should take a relativistic stance on slavery. We need to condone the actual practice, but have compaasion those who did it weren't "enlightened" enough.

One day we'll finally realize eating animals is an incompassionate act. Like how cats and dogs are illegal to eat, because we realize they're our companions or for some "pets." But even our "food" have the same characteristics but unfortunately lack the PR cats and dogs take for granted.

When that day comes morals you hold dear are condemned in the future, you better hope my vision of values of compassion come about, rather than yours of judging the past bases upon the present.
"Stop making me a nazi fascist by advocating for affirmative action, equal funding for schools and fair lending laws.”
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
You just tried to blame liberals being liberal for your descent into nazism
You've said a lot of moronic things but that has to be the most moronic. I never claimed to be a Nazi and only point out how much your side are "friendly" Nazis, but Nazis all the same.

I haven't read a single rhetoric of a Nazi who calls for the abolition of capitalism, and calls everyone who says such is a Marxist.

Capitalism is an authoritarian system. One proposed alternative is Marxism, which is even more authoritarian, and every bit a death sentence upon humanity.

The Nazis as you call them, are exactly like you who think they can tame capitalism to serve their means.

But there are many alternatives to ending capitalism which aren't Marxism, that pretends to do away with capitalism, but only does so for the proletariat, while the bourgeois are the only ones taking advantage of a capitalist economy with a "capitalist free" mask.
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
"Stop making me a nazi fascist by advocating for affirmative action, equal funding for schools and fair lending laws.”
You live on Fantasy Island, I live in reality. While it may sound good to you, It's not good to the white folk who are then a second class citizen. Paying back the evil rich whites (who I agree are evil, but so are the rich minorities whose wealth is just as equal, you forgetting your people Kanye or is he magically now white?)by penalizing the poor ones isn' solving anything but your ego with revenge.

We already have fair lending laws, it's called a credit score and your wage to debt ratio.

Equal funding of schools isn't up to me, it's up to the communities who don't agree on your definition of "equal funding" and go by tax codes such as Mello Roos that take local property taxes and give them to the community school, not into a national fund.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
You live on Fantasy Island, I live in reality. While it may sound good to you, It's not good to the white folk who are then a second class citizen. Paying back the evil rich whites (who I agree are evil, but so are the rich minorities whose wealth is just as equal, you forgetting your people Kanye or is he magically now white?)by penalizing the poor ones isn' solving anything but your ego with revenge.

We already have fair lending laws, it's called a credit score and your wage to debt ratio.

Equal funding of schools isn't up to me, it's up to the communities who don't agree on your definition of "equal funding" and go by tax codes such as Mello Roos that take local property taxes and give them to the community school, not into a national fund.
Affirmative action, equal funding for schools and fair housing laws does not make white people into second class citizens.

As usual, your ignorance is showing alt.right white boy.
 

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
Affirmative action, equal funding for schools and fair housing laws does not make white people into second class citizens.

As usual, your ignorance is showing alt.right white boy.
Saying white people have white "privilege" is insulting, demeaning, and racist, making them admit they're second class citizens.
 
Top