In ultimate alpha move, trump orders tear gas to be fired at shoeless children

Budley Doright

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
“the silly string conversation has been put to rest- you missed it sorry..i'm not re-hashing.”
Nope!
Oh I get it, you think I’m here for the scholarly discussions.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
blaze 57 said:
That mean Orange Man. Now he is gassing his own citizens. Gas prices dropping below $2.00 gal in Texas and who knows where else. Impeach him!
Click to expand...
LOL

You so don't get it.

Gas prices are dropping because demand is projected to drop due to recession.

Trump's tariffs are good for me because food prices are depressed due to reduced demand. Farmers are already feeling the pinch. It will be worse next year when the new contracts for their products are drawn up. Low gas prices are good for me but talk to the people in the west and mid-west who are about to see their boom go to bust. Your earlier brag about China's economy being dragged down was stupid too. Our economies are linked, dumbshit.

Economics aren't an "I win if you lose" kind of game, it's more of a "win-win" or "lose-lose" partnership between nations, sectors and economies. That's too complicated for you, isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
LOL

You so don't get it.

Gas prices are dropping because demand is projected to drop due to recession.

Trump's tariffs are good for me because food prices are depressed due to reduced demand. Farmers are already feeling the pinch. It will be worse next year when the new contracts for their products are drawn up. Low gas prices are good for me but talk to the people in the west and mid-west who are about to see their boom go to bust. Your earlier brag about China's economy being dragged down was stupid too. Our economies are linked, dumbshit.

Economics aren't an "I win if you lose" kind of game, it's more of a "win-win" or "lose-lose" partnership between nations, sectors and economies. That's too complicated for you, isn't it?
Click to expand...
The modern day Republican is almost as dumb as the average Russian at this point.
 
Boberman

Boberman

Well-Known Member
If you were raped or the unborn child has some horrible genetic defect then yes. Now if you let some dude nut in you and you got knocked up. Well that is a choice and choices have consequences. 100% you should have that child. Especially with reports like this coming out. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html . Again sex is a choice letting a dude nut in you is a choice. To me at that point the women already made here choice. That is her right to choose. Now there is a life created and it should have the right to live. And of course there should be exceptions in the case of rape or disease.
 
Budley Doright

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
Boberman said:
If you were raped or the unborn child has some horrible genetic defect then yes. Now if you let some dude nut in you and you got knocked up. Well that is a choice and choices have consequences. 100% you should have that child. Especially with reports like this coming out. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html . Again sex is a choice letting a dude nut in you is a choice. To me at that point the women already made here choice. That is her right to choose. Now there is a life created and it should have the right to live. And of course there should be exceptions in the case of rape or disease.
Click to expand...
Thank you old wise one. “Nut in you” wow lol.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Boberman said:
If you were raped or the unborn child has some horrible genetic defect then yes. Now if you let some dude nut in you and you got knocked up. Well that is a choice and choices have consequences. 100% you should have that child. Especially with reports like this coming out. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html . Again sex is a choice letting a dude nut in you is a choice. To me at that point the women already made here choice. That is her right to choose. Now there is a life created and it should have the right to live. And of course there should be exceptions in the case of rape or disease.
Click to expand...
I think everybody should have an abortion whether they need one or not.

You and Buddha Boi 1st. Get on the table.

Let me know when you brainless idiots care as much about children as you do about fetuses. Thanks.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Plan B is available and no one has to get pregnant if they had unprotected sex..if you don't use it, it won't work. only you and your partner know this..it takes two..go spend $9.50, for 'my choice emergency' at walmart.

if you can't spend $9.50, same as condoms which should've been used..you may wish to consider sterilization.

this will stop the abortion debate in it's tracks..all in favor say 'aye'.

now let's get back to thread topic.
 
Last edited:
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Buddha2525 said:
My issue isn't about what women can do with their body. The baby needs an advocate. I'm it's advocate. Just like slaver owners tried to say non-slave owners had no say if they don't own slaves. If it what was only the woman, without another life involved, you'd have a point.

In the case of a tumor or parasite, a woman has every right to implore a doctor to remove it. No matter how much you'd like to liken a baby to a tumor or parasite, doesn't make your fantasy a reality.

The slave and unborn in both cases are argued as property. Unlike slavery the baby is still considered property. That doesn't get rid of the arguement because one side is completely convinced of its merits.

What's ironic is women were once considered a man's prolerty and was one of the reasons they couldn't vote. Justification was because man is doninant over woman. A woman couldn't defend herself. Just like a baby can't.

A senile old person can't defend themselves from the dominant youth who would send them adrift to die. A quadriplegic can't defend themselves from being pushed off a cliff in their wheel chair. If you don't know another's language you can't understand their pleas for you not to kill them.

But you may rightfully claim that even if all those people can't express in words you understand nor can they stop your actions to kill them, all of them can show their intent for you not to. Just like the aborted baby shown in this video tries to get away from the abortionist's suction wand trying to tear it apart. Nor can you deny that if left to nature without human intervention the unborn would eventually become born.

You liberals suck at making arguments.

Click to expand...
You have an abortion homicide pact with your wife
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Boberman said:
If you were raped or the unborn child has some horrible genetic defect then yes. Now if you let some dude nut in you and you got knocked up. Well that is a choice and choices have consequences. 100% you should have that child. Especially with reports like this coming out. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2018/cb18-41-population-projections.html . Again sex is a choice letting a dude nut in you is a choice. To me at that point the women already made here choice. That is her right to choose. Now there is a life created and it should have the right to live. And of course there should be exceptions in the case of rape or disease.
Click to expand...
You sound like an incel
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
I think everybody should have an abortion whether they need one or not.

You and Buddha Boi 1st. Get on the table.

Let me know when you brainless idiots care as much about children as you do about fetuses. Thanks.
Click to expand...
wait..wasn't this thread about throwing tear gas at unwanted children?..at what age (or point) do they go from wanted to unwanted?
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Buddha2525 said:
My issue isn't about what women can do with their body. The baby needs an advocate. I'm it's advocate. Just like slaver owners tried to say non-slave owners had no say if they don't own slaves. If it what was only the woman, without another life involved, you'd have a point.

In the case of a tumor or parasite, a woman has every right to implore a doctor to remove it. No matter how much you'd like to liken a baby to a tumor or parasite, doesn't make your fantasy a reality.

The slave and unborn in both cases are argued as property. Unlike slavery the baby is still considered property. That doesn't get rid of the arguement because one side is completely convinced of its merits.

What's ironic is women were once considered a man's prolerty and was one of the reasons they couldn't vote. Justification was because man is doninant over woman. A woman couldn't defend herself. Just like a baby can't.

A senile old person can't defend themselves from the dominant youth who would send them adrift to die. A quadriplegic can't defend themselves from being pushed off a cliff in their wheel chair. If you don't know another's language you can't understand their pleas for you not to kill them.

But you may rightfully claim that even if all those people can't express in words you understand nor can they stop your actions to kill them, all of them can show their intent for you not to. Just like the aborted baby shown in this video tries to get away from the abortionist's suction wand trying to tear it apart. Nor can you deny that if left to nature without human intervention the unborn would eventually become born.

You liberals suck at making arguments.

Click to expand...
that's called 'quickening' the fetus will move at anything that touches it..if i poked my stomach the fetus would move.

and slaves are not considered property? women were men's property until just about 100 years ago..the children belonged to the man, too. a women could not initiate a divorce but the man could, keep the children and throw the women out with no money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top