Merry fucking Christmas

londonfog

Well-Known Member
So, if a person DOESN'T want and DOESN'T use something, you agree that forcing them to pay for that something is a kind of
theft / extortion ?

BTW, if you don't believe that, I'd like you to send me some money for some ideas I have. If you don't I'm going to steal your house. If you don't like that and resist, you'll be jailed and /or killed. Fair deal?
You used the system for 36 years with your kids. So you DID want and DID use something.
Did any of your boys have to repeat a grade ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You used the system for 36 years with your kids. So you DID want and DID use something.
Did any of your boys have to repeat a grade ?
You have it backwards though. The "system" used me. It didn't ASK if I wanted to purchase a service. It said, "you will be forced to pay for this whether you want to or not". You will be forced to pay for this, whether you use it or not.

To say it's voluntary when a person complies with something while they have no realistic choice not to comply or be harmed if they don't comply, is the argument you are attempting to make. Which is why you're wrong.
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
It's not too late to jump on the bandwagon of Government, make a change for the better and put the rest of the world at ease.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No, I think if all people do not attain the wherewithal to consent to something at the exact same age, there is a possibility that laws which attempt to codify something like consent by setting an exact age in a particular locale, which laughably differs from plantation to plantation, may be abrogating at least one persons ability to consent, somewhere. Hence, abrogating a persons right.

You yourself have provided an excellent example of the idea that while most people follow general age trends when attaining mental wherewithal to do things, it is not a fixed thing. For instance by the age of 17 MOST people know that shitting on a floor in a restroom at a place where people gather to eat food is a dumb thing to do, everyone but you, that is, Poopy Pants.

Yet, you being a shit outlier, you represented the extreme low end of the development of the mental acuity to determine whether to, shit or not to shit, Shitspeare. That is the question. (Well it's not really the question, but the Shitspeare thing wouldn't have worked unless I included that part.)

So you think that some 11 year olds can consent to sex with adults, and that everyone thinks you’re a pedophile because they’re irrational and I make “false accusations” against you
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
You have it backwards though. The "system" used me. It didn't ASK if I wanted to purchase a service. It said, "you will be forced to pay for this whether you want to or not". You will be forced to pay for this, whether you use it or not.

To say it's voluntary when a person complies with something while they have no realistic choice not to comply or be harmed if they don't comply, is the argument you are attempting to make. Which is why you're wrong.
this is why when you retire you have to be cognizant of taxation type which is why arizona, florida etc are considered lower cost retire options. trust me though, you lose out..you may not be paying for schools but lose in other ways- not what it's cracked up to be.

what ever you DO you like paying for..just pretend that money is 100% going to that..don't worry about the pie chart.
 
Last edited:

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You have it backwards though. The "system" used me. It didn't ASK if I wanted to purchase a service. It said, "you will be forced to pay for this whether you want to or not". You will be forced to pay for this, whether you use it or not.

To say it's voluntary when a person complies with something while they have no realistic choice not to comply or be harmed if they don't comply, is the argument you are attempting to make. Which is why you're wrong.
If you had of homeschooled you might have a better argument. You did not. You forced someone to teach and feed your children for a total of 36 years.
Did they also ride the bus. or did you drive them on public roads ?
 

NWO4LIFE

Active Member
this is why when you retire you have to be cognizant of taxation type which is why arizona, florida etc are considered lower cost retire options. trust me though, you lose out..you may not be paying for schools but lose in other ways- not what it's cracked up to be.

what ever you DO you like paying for..just pretend that money is 100% going to that..don't worry about the pie chart.
Financial advice from schuylaar bahahahahahahaha. Merry Christmas ya'll.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
If you had of homeschooled you might have a better argument. You did not. You forced someone to teach and feed your children for a total of 36 years.
Did they also ride the bus. or did you drive them on public roads ?
Your post is fraught with error.

When demonstrating who is in the wrong to the simple minded and children sometimes we need to get them to understand that the person who hits first is often the culpable party.

Need I go on?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Your post is fraught with error.

When demonstrating who is in the wrong to the simple minded and children sometimes we need to get them to understand that the person who hits first is often the culpable party.

Need I go on?
After sending your children to public school for a total of 36 years, when did you start feeling negative towards public schools ?
 
Top