You are again citing worthless PR paid for by the fossil fuel industry to seed doubt about climate change. The climate record goes back thousands of years and farther if one knows where to look.
Micro-scale? Global average temperature is micro-scale?
Now then, let's talk about all of the effects going on around the world that can only happen when the earth's climate warms. Such as loss of glacier ice. Rising sea temperatures. Migration of animals and plants into areas they haven't been seen ever. More severe weather events including flash flood caused by historically unprecedented intense rain such as in Houston, North Carolina and Kerala India. These events are all independent of each other but explained by a rapidly warming climate.
If you don't believe that the shit you are citing comes from PR consultants paid for by the fossil fuel industry, then take a gander at this from the Union of Concerned Scientists. ExxonMobil has already come out and said that the greenhouse effect cannot be denied:
https://www.ucsusa.org/using-astroturf-front-groups-hide-fossil-fuel-lobbying-efforts#.XFIscVxKiUk
an excerpt:
As a leaked 2014 presentation by WSPA (Western States Petroleum Association) President Catherine Reheis-Boyd revealed, WSPA’s strategy was to use these fabricated organizations to falsely represent grassroots opposition to forward-looking policy on climate change and clean technologies. WSPA and its member companies oppose science-based climate policies that are critically needed to mitigate the damaging impacts of global warming.
WSPA’s leaked presentation was hardly the first time the fossil fuel industry’s plans to manufacture uncertainty about climate science and science-based policies were exposed. These efforts have a very long history. For instance, as a later leaked memo reveals, in 1998, the American Petroleum Institute—the county’s largest oil trade association—convened a team of major oil producers to create the “Global Climate Science Communications Plan.” This plan set the roadmap for deceiving the public about climate change by overplaying uncertainties in the science.
By this point, internal memos at ExxonMobil had alerted the industry that “the scientific basis for the Greenhouse Effect […] cannot be denied,” so the Plan can’t be interpreted as a legitimate call for balance. Some companies were even publicly acknowledging that global warming was “possibly due in part to greenhouse emissions caused by human activity” while they privately worked through this Plan to promote uncertainty about climate science.
You right whingers never got the memo. I wonder why? Actually I don't. You and your kind are tools.