You Have The "Religious Liberty" To Suck Baby Dicks

[MidwestGorilla219]

Tell me more about the invisible man I talk to.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

View attachment 4278475 View attachment 4278477

Uh, why are you posting bible tracts?

Are you really this fucking stupid?

 

[Sativied]

Uh, why are you posting bible tracts?

Clearly an attempt to convert you to Satanism

 

[TacoMac]

According to Leviticus, EVERYBODY should be put to death.

 

[londonfog]

IPX/SPX or another routable protocol that fits in the OSI model.

Your turn, explain how we would use TCP/IP without an internetwork...

I wasn’t even suggesting you were wrong with your statement or even the conclusion you imply. But if you insist... Much of both technical and medical advances are a results of war, of the will to power. Which without governments there would still surely be.

IPX/SPX for HTTP ???? Good luck with that service. Much better usage for only LAN within the office not WAN...but I'm sure you knew that.

My point we use government ideas and projects everyday. To say we don't need government is kind of stupid and would lead to chaos and a stoppage of developments.

are you against government funding medical research ? Who would pay for such research if government did not ? Please cite names. Thanks

 

[londonfog]

meaning ...you got nothing to say

 

[MidwestGorilla219]

Uh, why are you posting bible tracts?

Are you really this fucking stupid?

You know what I'm getting at...

Clearly an attempt to convert you to Satanism

 

[Sativied]

IPX/SPX for HTTP ???? Good luck with that service. Much better usage for only LAN within the office not WAN...but I'm sure you knew that.

My point we use government ideas and projects everyday. To say we don't need government is kind of stupid and would lead to chaos and a stoppage of developments.

HTTP is part of the TCP/IP suite so that’s a rather poor example. There are zero technical obstacles to develop a hyper text transfer protocol over SPX, just as any other application layer protocol. Sure, scalability was an issue, but that was true for earlier version of tcp/ip too. In fact the still widely used v4 is an extremely and inherently flawed basis for both public and private networks that still costs the economy billions a year.

It was an example. I’m not seriously suggesting IPX/SPX should be used instead. It’s however ridiculous to suggest we need governments because only they can develop the best scalable routable protocol.

The point is, it's just as “stupid” to suggest we need a government for technological advancement as it is to say we don’t need a government at all.

are you against government funding medical research ? Who would pay for such research if government did not ? Please cite names. Thanks

I’m a socialist when it comes to healthcare. But, you’re making an arguing from ignorance fallacy. Just because you, or we, don’t see possible alternatives doesn't mean they don’t exist or cannot be created by other means. Surely, despite the false dilemma you paint, you don’t really believe the government is the only one funding medical research.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

You know what I'm getting at...


View attachment 4278685

I suspect that you erroneously consider me a deist.

I suspect that you make a habit of erroneously considering information.

 

[Rob Roy]

meaning ...you got nothing to say

No, meaning you, being deaf to logic, can't hear me.

 

[londonfog]

HTTP is part of the TCP/IP suite so that’s a rather poor example. There are zero technical obstacles to develop a hyper text transfer protocol over SPX, just as any other application layer protocol. Sure, scalability was an issue, but that was true for earlier version of tcp/ip too. In fact the still widely used v4 is an extremely and inherently flawed basis for both public and private networks that still costs the economy billions a year.

It was an example. I’m not seriously suggesting IPX/SPX should be used instead. It’s however ridiculous to suggest we need governments because only they can develop the best scalable routable protocol.

The point is, it's just as “stupid” to suggest we need a government for technological advancement as it is to say we don’t need a government at all.


I’m a socialist when it comes to healthcare. But, you’re making an arguing from ignorance fallacy. Just because you, or we, don’t see possible alternatives doesn't mean they don’t exist or cannot be created by other means. Surely, despite the false dilemma you paint, you don’t really believe the government is the only one funding medical research.

I can appreciated the government and her people for the good it can do for the people. I think those who say the government does nothing good are incorrect. Needs improvement in some areas. Hell yeah..but I will take it before I leave it.
I have seen chaos and anarchy and it is not a pretty sight. .

 

[Rob Roy]

I can appreciated the government and her people for the good it can do for the people. I think those who say the government does nothing good are incorrect. Needs improvement in some areas. Hell yeah..but I will take it before I leave it.
I have seen chaos and anarchy and it is not a pretty sight. .

Do you think people should be drafted to "protect freedom" too?

 

[londonfog]

Do you think people should be drafted to "protect freedom" too?

I have never been for the draft...but I would suggest people like you be the first to go

 

[Fogdog]

You know what I'm getting at...


View attachment 4278685

That's not the message taught in Genesis. We can read Genesis and derive our own interpretation as you apparently have done. That's part of the message in the story of the fruit from the tree of knowledge.