whytewidow
Well-Known Member
And roughly 35% of the heat put out by a 1khps is wasted. Bc its withdrawn from the grow area. Not all of it. But alot of it. How many people you know running 1khps isnt either extracting the heat bc its too much. Or cooling it with ac to get temps down. Which in turn is heat not used, and wasted electricity. Nobody runs a 1khps and the temp be right spot on. Without some type of either cooling or extraction. Which is essentially wasted. How can you say any heat extracted out to the atmosphere isnt unused heat and isnt wasted. That makes no sense. Or if you have to cool the ambient air temp with ac. The heated air you are cooling has already used electricity to produce it. And now your using more electricity to cool it. After it's already been heated up. Is wasting. Either way you look at it. That's the samething as saying I'll sell you this dollar for 1.50 you wasted 50 cents bc it's still only worth a dollar.With the same intensity, leaf temps and VPD there should be no difference in transpiration. You only need higher ambient temps to get the same leaf temps like with HPS. 28-29°C is optimal without CO2 and with HPS you need 25-26°C ambient to get the leaf temps in the desired range. With "cold" LED light there is almost no heat/infra red radiation and the leaves have almost the same temps like the sourrounding air(within 1-2°C less). For this reason we need higher ambient temps and because humidity is relative we need higher humidity too.
Heat is not wasted! Plants also need heat but it don't drives photosynthesis directly. But it allows her to work more active. Like insects... At 20°C you can catch a fly easily by hand but at 30°C its almost impossible! An plant getting only 500μMol/s/m² but at 30°C grows faster like the same plant under 1500μMol/s but with only 20°C.
View attachment 4293292
Heat is an important factor inside a grow room and to say its wasted energy is simply not true. We can safe the energy produced from hps by using LEDs but we need higher ambient temps to get the same high growth rates and even better results. We can only get away with leds because the reflected light is also converted into heat and when we reduce the airflow its most of the time enough to heat up the tent but you need a minimum intensity and at the end we end up again with the 30-35w/sft recommendation.
Edit: my point is led will outgrow hps. Plain n simple. It takes less energy to produce the same results or better.
Last edited: