Make magats cry
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
They've gone full tribal, Trump should sell spears along with MAGA hats, maybe red war paint too, they can use it to paint SUCKER on their foreheads. The stupid and weak feel most threatened and make up the bulk of racists and xenophobes. Trump has managed to gather them all together in the states and in doing so has reveled the scale of the problem and also the need to combat it with civil rights laws and much more. Ya should grab the bull by the balls before ya have to handle him by the horns.
hotrodharley
Well-Known Member
au·thor·i·tar·i·an
/əˌTHôrəˈterēən/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
- favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom.
"the transition from an authoritarian to a democratic regime"
synonyms: autocratic, dictatorial, totalitarian, despotic, tyrannical, autarchic, draconian, absolute, arbitrary, oppressive, repressive, illiberal, undemocratic, antidemocratic;
There’s Trump and his Trumpistas. People living here hear about supporters of some vicious dictator and they picture some evil person when it’s really just people like Trump supporters. Stupid or wealthy with a lot at stake.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
- Appoint Hillary Clinton as special prosecutor for Trump post inauguration
- Hate speech laws, hate speech is not free speech, either is yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater or says the SCOTUS
- Voter rights laws with stiff penalties for voter fraud or suppression make a special conspiracy law for it.
- Elections USA to defend, supervise & monitor federal and state elections.
- Eliminate the electoral college and while yer at it proportional representation in the senate, people should have votes, not territory.
- Make colluding with a foreign power illegal with specific legislation.
- Make all repeating firearms illegal, single shot muzzle loaders as the founding fathers intended, let the federalist and originalist conservative judges grapple with that one. You know the guys who think the constitution is a dead document. If the government can ban large calibers and machine guns, why not semi automatics and even repeating arms. I mean they should be available for a well ordered militia along with guns right? Not to mention grenades.
- Make Spanish an official language, if ya really wanna drive em off the deep end.
- Call native Americans "First Nations" and honor some treaties for a change.
- Make it illegal to erect or maintain a monument for a traitor, except a grave marker (you'll need to know where to piss).
- Create a conspiracy to commit treason law punishable by death and with no hot war required, unlike regular treason, you don't even have to use the word treason, call it betrayal for instance.
- A trillion dollar reparation fund for African Americans and use it for free heath care, free college etc. Put Obama in charge of it.
Last edited:
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Here's one that should get the Trumpers frothing and do some real good too.
Congress should use it's inherent powers in a most unexpected way. Subpoena Stephen Miller to the house to testify and when if doesn't show up, send the Sargent of Arms to snatch him early some morning with an arrest warrant, if he does show up arrest him there. Put him on the hot seat about child detention, and his influence on policy etc., when he refuses to answer give him a yellow jump suit (canary yellow for the house jail) and put him in a cage in the house basement, just like those on the border (except it won't be over crowded), give him a silver blanket too (if it's good enough for kids, it's good enough for him, equality under the law, no shower or tooth brush either). Keep him there until he answers all questions to the satisfaction of the house and then sentence him to 10 years for contempt of congress after a full house trial (no pardon on that one). That example should prime the pump and be popular among many, Stephen has some serious questions to answer and those answers won't look good in a public hearing. Then there's perjury, but Donald can pardon that...
Congress should use it's inherent powers in a most unexpected way. Subpoena Stephen Miller to the house to testify and when if doesn't show up, send the Sargent of Arms to snatch him early some morning with an arrest warrant, if he does show up arrest him there. Put him on the hot seat about child detention, and his influence on policy etc., when he refuses to answer give him a yellow jump suit (canary yellow for the house jail) and put him in a cage in the house basement, just like those on the border (except it won't be over crowded), give him a silver blanket too (if it's good enough for kids, it's good enough for him, equality under the law, no shower or tooth brush either). Keep him there until he answers all questions to the satisfaction of the house and then sentence him to 10 years for contempt of congress after a full house trial (no pardon on that one). That example should prime the pump and be popular among many, Stephen has some serious questions to answer and those answers won't look good in a public hearing. Then there's perjury, but Donald can pardon that...
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
It doesn't work that way.
You have to show cause for a subpoena. Miller, to date, has nothing to do with anything Congress is investigating.
Also, Congress doesn't have police powers. They can't arrest or detain anybody for any reason.
That's why they're presently in court trying to compell presently subpoenaed witnesses to testify.
You have to show cause for a subpoena. Miller, to date, has nothing to do with anything Congress is investigating.
Also, Congress doesn't have police powers. They can't arrest or detain anybody for any reason.
That's why they're presently in court trying to compell presently subpoenaed witnesses to testify.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
I think with what is going on with immigration and along the boarder there would be just cause to haul Stephen in for a little talk and if he cooperates no problem. He won't though, so give him the full Montey. After they have exhausted all reasonable means congress can deputize a hundred former FBI agents to the Sargent of Arms and go to town with the inherent power of the house, they have the power and the courts will do nothing about it either, it's constitutional.
They wisely want to bring the courts onside with key witnesses to compel testimony and are in no rush, when they are and have to, you'll see the gloves come off. Using inherent powers would not be too popular either, the objective is to win it all in 2020
This was just a bit of fun, the thread is called make magats cry after all, though jailing Miller would stop a lot of suffering and bullshit.
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
You are so completely wrong it's beyond belief.
You're worse than that UFO guy on the History Channel with the shit you post.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Point by point please,ad hominem attacks are not cool, save it for the Trumpers, they deserve it. If you have an argument state it and work on your social skills while yer at it.
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
OK.
First off, you can't subpoena Stephen Miller without cause. He is nothing but an adviser. He has no political post in Washington and as such is not subject to any oath of office or any oversight by the Congress.
You're done right there. It's over.
BUT
Let's say you did actually want to look into "all the stuff happening at the border".
The people you would investigate would be the Department of Homeland Security. That, in and of itself, would take years to pull off and before you did that you would have to ascertain if someone had broken the law (they haven't yet) or broken DHS policy (they're actually looking at that as we speak).
So, you're wrong. Completely. Totally. In every way, shape or form you could possibly be wrong, you are wrong.
There is only one instance in which Stephen Miller could ever be subpoenaed and it's such a far fetched scenario it's laughable to even post it.
Lets say that during an investigation of DHS, a senior official stated under oath that the president ordered ______________ (fill in the blank for the law violation) based on the suggestion of Stephen Miller.
The congress could then subpoena Stephen Miller to ask him if that statement were true and what, if anything, he actually advised the president.
But guess what? He would ignore it because that falls under the protection of executive privilege and there wouldn't be anything on earth Congress could do about it.
But they would get to subpoena him. It would never be enforceable though.
So again, you're wrong in every way, shape and form.
First off, you can't subpoena Stephen Miller without cause. He is nothing but an adviser. He has no political post in Washington and as such is not subject to any oath of office or any oversight by the Congress.
You're done right there. It's over.
BUT
Let's say you did actually want to look into "all the stuff happening at the border".
The people you would investigate would be the Department of Homeland Security. That, in and of itself, would take years to pull off and before you did that you would have to ascertain if someone had broken the law (they haven't yet) or broken DHS policy (they're actually looking at that as we speak).
So, you're wrong. Completely. Totally. In every way, shape or form you could possibly be wrong, you are wrong.
There is only one instance in which Stephen Miller could ever be subpoenaed and it's such a far fetched scenario it's laughable to even post it.
Lets say that during an investigation of DHS, a senior official stated under oath that the president ordered ______________ (fill in the blank for the law violation) based on the suggestion of Stephen Miller.
The congress could then subpoena Stephen Miller to ask him if that statement were true and what, if anything, he actually advised the president.
But guess what? He would ignore it because that falls under the protection of executive privilege and there wouldn't be anything on earth Congress could do about it.
But they would get to subpoena him. It would never be enforceable though.
So again, you're wrong in every way, shape and form.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Even if he ordered illegal things? That would negate privilege.
I wasn't serious about jailing Stephen Miller using the inherent power of congress, just like I wasn't serious about most of the things I listed in the post above. The thread is about the things that would make Trump supporters cry, it was one of Buck's fantasies, not mine, though I do like to pile on... I mean a trillion dollars in reparations for African Americans would go over like a turd in a punch bowl with the electorate, talk about bringing out Trump's base!
Last edited:
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
I think I've figured out most of the Trumper posts, most of these clowns are drunk or half in the bag when they get in front of the computer with a beer in one hand and the mouse in the other. It could explain a lot of the incoherence, stupidity, childish behavior and social and emotional retardation we see from them...
I'm not saying their not racists fools, just drunk ones...
I'm not saying their not racists fools, just drunk ones...
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Dr.Amber Trichome
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Also just 1 year and a handful of days before we watch Trump's head explode while giving his concession speech.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
He won’t concede
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
He'll run to Moscow if he can, might start a pool thread on it one day.
