So people have different philosophies on how to handle their cloning businesses. Who cares. Economically speaking, they're both viable. Smokadepep is right when he talks about low price and high quality products being the goal of many markets. Businesses/individuals compete with one another for the consumers attention and money, and generally speaking, those with bad products lose out in the long run, and of the ones left with good products, the better priced one generally (not always) wins. This is just fine, so long as there's not a trail of morally ambiguous bread crumbs behind the business, like sweatshops in foreign countries or environmental malpractice, but we're cloning plants here guys, not making shoes.
HTOYO seems to look at it differently. Less volume, higher pricing, and more personal involvement (willing to ship internationally it seems, larger clones, etc). I'd call this the 'craft' business model, and it sells just as well. Some people are willing to pay higher prices for something they feel was cared for or 'done right', which makes good sense. It's in stark contrast to the lifeless factory feel of a Walmart business model, where you know damn well the table you just bought hasn't been looked at by another human for more than just a few seconds since the day it was chopped down in the amazon. This model is psychologically enticing, as it invokes trust and familiarity. This is why even in today's modern age of ultra-technologically efficient business models, smaller and medium sized businesses are still around, and thriving in some markets (craft beer, craft food joints, smaller local farms, honey, meat, local cafe vs starbucks, etc etc).
Forgive me if either of you feel misrepresented by this post, but I don't see the big deal. Go ahead and think of it differently! Diversity and differences are welcome in markets. It makes things constantly evolve and move forward. Why the tension here?