Doesn't change the facts
28% < 50%
It's a fact that 28% is less than 50%. Doesn't matter who says it. I am referring to this remark, not your deflection about my math skills.
In addition to that, I can also factually state that 45 < 1991
I can also factually state that 28% of 1991 = 557 (this is arithmetic, I wouldn't call it math, but whatever).
Also, 557 < 1991
So, yeah, current elections results support my conclusion that Bernie isn't close to a large plurality, much less the majority needed to win the nomination outright. Do you want to argue with that?
Now then, for a non-math question regarding logic. You say you won't vote for Biden, Bloomer, or Buddgig because they are all racist. Sanders has made many racist statements and has been criticized by black rights activists in Vermont for treating them as if they were invisible (yeah, ok so there are like three black people in the state but still, bear with me). What makes Bernie's history of being racist acceptable to you yet you reject the others?