Does anyone here actually watch the Senate hearings on voter fraud?

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
i've made topics like this before, but not here.
Why even ask the question? They provide the answers by their words and actions. If you know what motives you and forms you intention, you have little difficulty understanding others, provided you love and understand yourself and love them. To defeat our enemies we must first understand them and to do that we must first love them. I love you like your mommy, but like your mommy I will sometimes spank you. When Donald goes down I will most likely pity him too, but I have true compassion for his many victims. Donald is my enemy because he represents a threat to my community, my country, he is despicable as a person too and victimized people all his life, then his country, but always himself. No one could fuck Donald more than he fucks himself, his voters try to fuck themselves too, but fortunately there were more sane people in America who haven't consumed the good in themselves with hate and fear.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
To create content for people so they have something to do, even if its mindless or silly.
There is too much to be mindful of right now and the situation in America is dire with 300,000 dead and a 911's worth going down a day. We can joke though, people do that on the gallows too.
 
Last edited:

Mr_X

Well-Known Member
Dominion CEO is going to testify today at the Michigan Legislature hearing, but most people aren't going to watch the stream and going to base their opinion on their favorite news outlet then get pissed at the other side.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Dominion CEO is going to testify today at the Michigan Legislature hearing, but most people aren't going to watch the stream and going to base their opinion on their favorite news outlet then get pissed at the other side.
Are you aware that the politicians can use their time to push propaganda and that these hearings have been used as bullshit?

It is just as important to understand what is the actual reality with factual reporting. The hearings might matter if it was a legitimate issue, or if I really wanted to find out some information about this, but these hearings are just keeping Trump's troll in the news.

You are right though, people who pretend like this is a big issue will be all upset about what Trump's trolls tell them to be upset about and showing the relevant clips of those hearings that actually talk about why it is wrong is a good thing to know is there.
 

Mr_X

Well-Known Member
redhat, "theres fraud!"
me, "oh yeah? can you name one of the counties being questioned or the name of an election official being questioned?"
redhat, "no, but theres fraud. i can feel it"
me, "fuck your feels. go watch the meetings and judge for yourself you sheep"
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I watched some of them. It seems like trial by allegation, instead of trial by evidence. The burden of proof and poll workers/watchers they presented was not strong and liable enough. there were no names to be accused. mismanagement, lack of training, dominion machines breaking, and human error isn't fraud. i do think the dominion machines should be inspected, but its not going to help much except prove that people are too stupid to work a fax machine. i also think that if there was fraud or problems with dominion, it should have been investigated before or during the election, not after the results.
Why do you think there was fraud with Dominion? What evidence was given for that? Why do you think the dominion machines were not inspected? Are you just assuming that they weren't? It's not hard to do as shown here:


and here:

Georgia says voting machine audit found no evidence of fraud or tampering

You are trying to prove a negative. "show me there wasn't fraud". That's not possible, really. So the requirement is: Show proof there was fraud. Trump claimed there was massive fraud across six states. As Bolton criticized the claim:

"The arguments that Trump and his campaign are making on the conspiracy to deny him reelection is this conspiracy is so vast and so successful that apparently there's no evidence of it. "

And so I ask again, what reason would I have to sit through some Republican propaganda, that they call "hearings", churning through a conspiracy theory that contains no evidence that it occurred and plenty of testimony that it did not?
 

Mr_X

Well-Known Member
Why do you think there was fraud with Dominion? What evidence was given for that? Why do you think the dominion machines were not inspected? Are you just assuming that they weren't? It's not hard to do as shown here:


and here:

Georgia says voting machine audit found no evidence of fraud or tampering

You are trying to prove a negative. "show me there wasn't fraud". That's not possible, really. So the requirement is: Show proof there was fraud. Trump claimed there was massive fraud across six states. As Bolton criticized the claim:

"The arguments that Trump and his campaign are making on the conspiracy to deny him reelection is this conspiracy is so vast and so successful that apparently there's no evidence of it. "

And so I ask again, what reason would I have to sit through some Republican propaganda, that they call "hearings", churning through a conspiracy theory that contains no evidence that it occurred and plenty of testimony that it did not?
where did i claim that i thought there was fraud? you seem triggered LOL
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
redhat, "theres fraud!"
me, "oh yeah? can you name one of the counties being questioned or the name of an election official being questioned?"
redhat, "no, but theres fraud. i can feel it"
me, "fuck your feels. go watch the meetings and judge for yourself you sheep"
And then another bubble hardens and a real life link to someone with different information gets severed.

The trick I think is to try to figure out why they think that it matters, where did they see it.

Are they just parroting Trump? Or is it something that they have had spammed to them on Facebook, in every other email that they open up, a conversation with their 'friends' on Facebook, and then listening to Mark Levin scream about it on the way home just before falling asleep with a beer in their hand after a hard days work in front of Tucker yelling it to them.
 

Mr_X

Well-Known Member
And then another bubble hardens and a real life link to someone with different information gets severed.

The trick I think is to try to figure out why they think that it matters, where did they see it.

Are they just parroting Trump? Or is it something that they have had spammed to them on Facebook, in every other email that they open up, a conversation with their 'friends' on Facebook, and then listening to Mark Levin scream about it on the way home just before falling asleep with a beer in their hand after a hard days work in front of Tucker yelling it to them.
and then they assume im part of the other side just because they dont like my opinion.
 

Mr_X

Well-Known Member
It was contained in the "Senate hearings" that you so earnestly want people's opinions about. There is no evidence of fraud, so why should anybody sit through those hearings?
just because i want to hear peoples opinions doesn't mean im part of a political party.
 
Top