k0rps
Well-Known Member
Can you explainWelcome to HAMAS propaganda, mate
Can you explainWelcome to HAMAS propaganda, mate
Welcome to HAMAS propaganda, mate
Yep the same, propaganda, it is sad what's going on, but until both reach and agreement... what are we gonna do...smh..
Social media countries do not care about Israel and the Palestinians. Why are they removing content? Because if they did not they would be called up by Senators in the US asking why they allow the content from the ME but stifle it in the US. Please think things through before you post.Of course. Social media companies take orders from Israel to censor pro-Palestinian content. Confirmed by Israel's justice minister 2016 who said yt,goog,fb, deleted most the content Israel requested them to remove. Saying the content would "incite" Palestinian violence.
Oh you must be from a Berenstein Bears timeline.Israelis treat Palestinians the same as Native Americans were treated, and for that time in our history, i am ashamed.
No. They wouldn't. That's been done to death.Now, if ALL the Palestinian people would come to the table with the offer of renouncing all violence would Israel bite?
Id like to toss out there that I am not sure this is correct.Welcome to HAMAS propaganda, mate
The Israeli side of things..I think it would be more accurate to describe it as anti-Isreali propaganda.
In 1994 the Knesset amended two basic laws, Human Dignity and Liberty and Freedom of Occupation, introducing (among other changes) a statement saying "the fundamental human rights in Israel will be honored (...) in the spirit of the principles included in the declaration of the establishment of the State of Israel."
1992
Declares basic human rights in Israel are based on the recognition of the value of man, the sanctity of his life and the fact that he is free. Defines human freedom as right to leave and enter the country, privacy (including speech, writings, and notes), intimacy, and protection from unlawful searches of one's person or property. Any violation of this right shall be "by a law befitting the values of the State of Israel, enacted for a proper purpose, and to an extent no greater than is required". This law also includes instruction regarding its own permanence and protection from changes by means of emergency regulations.
1994
Guarantees every Israel national or resident's "right to engage in any occupation, profession or trade". Any violation of this right shall be "by a law befitting the values of the State of Israel, enacted for a proper purpose, and to an extent no greater than is required". This law also includes instruction regarding its own permanence and protection from changes by means of emergency regulations.
2014
Establishes that if the Israeli government adopts a decision or signs an agreement stipulating that the laws, jurisdiction, and administrative authority of the State of Israel will no longer apply to a certain geographical area, such agreement or decision must either be adopted via a treaty approved by 80 MKs, or by an absolute majority vote in a referendum.[14] This means that Israeli sovereign territory (East Jerusalem, Golan Heights and any land within the 1949 armistice lines), under Israeli law, can only be relinquished either through a treaty approved by over 80 MKs, in which case a referendum is not necessary, or before a treaty is valid, it must be approved by an absolute majority vote in a referendum.[15]
2018
Defines Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people.[16] The Nation-State Law also asserts that the Jewish people have the unique claim to national self-determination in the State of Israel, defines Hebrew as the official language of the state, and gives Arabic a special status in the state. It additionally defines the national symbols, holidays, and calendar of the state.[17]
Basic Laws of Israel - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
I don't think Ive seen anyone here are disagreeing with Israel/Netanyahu acting like dicks.The Israeli side of things..
Im not drawing any conclusions about you so no worries on my end. I wish everyone the best and like to try to keep myself from just assuming everyone is a troll, while simultaneously understanding that it is just as likely that they are one.Not sure how speaking out upon the injustices in Palestine can make you think it's Anti-Israeli, this was not my intention.
Please, if you have anything to add from the Israeli's POV or disclaiming the atrocities that are happening in Palestine, you are welcome to share.
Social media outlets are censoring posts about Palestinian oppression.
yeah i can see thisI think it would be more accurate to describe it as anti-Isreali propaganda.
Actually I think I may have been a bit lazy on this.yeah i can see this
There is, have to agree with you on that. Today i decided to go a little further look....so i went over to some Arabic News web sites to see what they have......Actually I think I may have been a bit lazy on this.
I think more it is propaganda using the very real strong emotions wrapped into the violent acts occurring right now and using it as a way to tie those emotions into some kind of conspiracy about 'cancel culture' to people who are then easily nudged with more anti-Israeli/Hamas rabbit holes. At least the video in the above post I made.
Everything that they are discussing as 'anti-free speech for Palestinians' that they are claiming as evidence could easily be mostly militarized trolls trying to enrage these very vulnerable people through their 'friends' getting deleted.
It is possible too that it is really happening, but they are giving a lot of opinion of reasons behind the censorship that they are seeing. But because the emotions about the content is so hot it is impossible to not get drawn into it as suppression because they are seeing it, but not necessarily from the tech companies outside of actually trying to stop the people from being attacked.
If that makes any sense. Basically the same 'cancel culture' troll that the Republicans are also trying to ride the wave of. Lots of butthurt going around.
Reporting on Israeli jets bombing city buildings to rubble and civilian deaths is propaganda?Id like to toss out there that I am not sure this is correct.
I think it would be more accurate to describe it as anti-Isreali propaganda.
I think it is subtle, but important difference, because it is easier to troll than it is to lift up. And a bad actor doesn't have to support Hamas to want to use them to cause made for TV drama using these poor people as a backdrop. Iran/Russia/Netanyahu/MBS/Republicans etc all gain far more for this than the Palestinians.
That's EXACTLY how it all got started.possible this is how all this got started in the first place???
Which video are you talking about?Reporting on Israeli jets bombing city buildings to rubble and civilian deaths is propaganda?
We are talking about an actual current event, not some made up or something from a hundred years ago.
The people of Gaza are prevented from leaving and Israel has a tight blockade that prevents aid from getting to the people living there. It was a humanitarian disaster before Israel started bombing. Is it propaganda to point that out?
Not trying to say it's the same and I'll agree up front that its a leading question and therefore a false argument. But I'll ask anyway.you know ladies and gents...think i might have found the root cause of this.....then again i could be wrong....
this is an excerp of the CNN story....
Egypt and Qatar's efforts to broker a truce have stalled over two main points, a senior Hamas leader with direct knowledge of mediation efforts told CNN on Sunday.
One stumbling block is Israel's insistence that Hamas must initiate the ceasefire, at least three hours before Israel, at which point Israel would follow. Hamas flatly rejected this proposal, the Hamas leader said.
The Hamas source said the other hurdle is Hamas' insistence that any ceasefire must include the ending of Israel's "provocations" at the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem -- the third holiest site in Islam -- and a resolution of the situation in Sheikh Jarrah, an East Jerusalem neighborhood where several Palestinian families face eviction.
A pro-Jewish settler organization called Nahalat Shimon is using a 1970 law to argue the owners of the land in question before 1948 were Jewish families, and so the current Palestinian landowners should be evicted and their properties given to Israeli Jews.
Palestinians say restitution laws in Israel are unfair because they have no legal means to reclaim property they lost to Jewish families in the late 1940s in what became the state of Israel.
possible this is how all this got started in the first place???
that's what i though........al jazeera has got a nice write up bout it too that i was just reading...That's EXACTLY how it all got started.
The Jews came in, kicked all the Palestinians out of their homes and off their land and took it, just like the Nazis had done to them.
Now, at the time, they promised that Palestinians could file for resettlement and/or challenge the rulings but we all know how that worked out. The Israelis have done nothing since day one but take. Then they took more. Then they took even more. And they continue to this day to take.