Joe steals Nancy's purse
- Thread starter ActionianJacksonian
- Start date
ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
Yet it was argued, and ruled and conclusions were made. I'm having a lot of fun at your expense right now. You should phone a friend for help.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
And yet, you continue to cite the ruling to justify Trump keeping his stolen documents.
If you didn't laugh at that no time for sergeants clip, you aren't human. That's some funny shit right there.
doublejj
Well-Known Member
are you implying most student loans aren't federal student loans?...Why can't you highlight the obvious answer to what I asked, it's in your quote? I'm just asking to see if you can draw the line yourself:
"1978 - Bankruptcy Reform Act
Congress overhauled the Bankruptcy Code and added Section 523(a)(. Under that section, education loans owed to a governmental unit or a nonprofit institution of higher education were nondischargeable for 5 years from the date the loan entered repayment unless the debtor was experiencing undue hardship.
1979 - Act on August 14th
The 1979 Act did two things. First, it made it so that a student loan made by the government or made under a government-funded program or a nonprofit institution was nondischargeable. This change made sure that a loan made under the Federal Perkins Loan program received discharge protection.
A Perkins Loan is a federal student loan made by a school to a student. The funds for the loan program come from a pool contributed to by both the government and the school.
Before the 1979 Act, it was arguable that a bankruptcy court could decide the section didn't apply to a loan made under the Perkins loan program. This change closed that loophole.
Second, the Act also changed the Bankruptcy Code by extending the 5-year period when the student loan borrower took a deferment or forbearance.
This change made it more difficult to tell when 5 years had passed. No longer could you look at when the last loan entered repayment and add 5 years.
You had to pull the actual payment history for the student debt to see if there were any deferments or forbearances."
ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
You brought it up just to what, prove you have no idea what you're talking about? It takes the PRA off the table for a criminal charge. Navy v Egan likewise takes espionage off the table.
Do you need help with that one as well? So what's left? Improper storage? Obstruction?
I mean like in your professional opinion lol
ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
No. I'm noticing that since they moved away from GI bills and under defense generally in about the time frame you referenced they have raised tuition 60 cents on the dollar for every dollar made available for the loans. That the federal loans are actually the reason school is so expensive. It's a good idea about bankruptcy though like you said. Maybe that's the entire reason, I'm not so sure.
doublejj
Well-Known Member
DOJ has "enough evidence" to indict Trump, Alan Dershowitz says
Donald Trump's former attorney Alan Dershowitz said Friday that the Department of Justice has enough evidence to indict the former president
DOJ has "enough evidence" to indict Trump, Alan Dershowitz says
Dershowitz said Judge Bruce Reinhart should not be blamed for approving the warrant.
www.axios.com
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I will admit I did not laugh. It was a serious point elegantly made, at a time when such insight was far from the norm.
doublejj
Well-Known Member
Ted Cruz Worries Working Class Might 'Get Off the Bong' and Vote After Student Debt Relief
www.commondreams.org
Ted Cruz Worries Working Class Might 'Get Off the Bong' and Vote After Student Debt Relief | Common Dreams
"Republicans revealing what they REALLY think about the working class," says Krystal Ball after Tex Cruz called student loan recipients pot-smoking "slackers."
www.commondreams.org
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
The case was thrown out because it had no standing.
ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
"AG should have never sought a warrant"DOJ has "enough evidence" to indict Trump, Alan Dershowitz says
Donald Trump's former attorney Alan Dershowitz said Friday that the Department of Justice has enough evidence to indict the former president
DOJ has "enough evidence" to indict Trump, Alan Dershowitz says
Dershowitz said Judge Bruce Reinhart should not be blamed for approving the warrant.
"There was no urgency"
"Does not pass the Nixon Clinton test"
What does that leave, improper storage?
ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
No credit, didn't show your work.
doublejj
Well-Known Member
what would a jury believe?...
ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Shove this up your ass.
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
casetext.com
CONCLUSION
Thus, because the Court is unable to provide the remedy plaintiff seeks by ordering that defendant “assume custody and control” over the audiotapes, the Court is unable to redress plaintiff's claim. Accordingly, the Court will grant defendant's motion to dismiss [Dkt. # 6] under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of standing. A separate order will issue.
doublejj
Well-Known Member
real facts or republican alternate facts?...I'm really counting on the Georgia case conviction so that the next republican president cannot pardon the SOB..
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
lulz
Biden's team is going on the offensive and it's delicious.
www.huffpost.com
On Thursday night, the spiciest thing on the internet (at least in political circles) was Joe Biden. You read that right. Joe. Biden.
With its Twitter account, the White House went after the Republican lawmakers criticizing the president’s decision to forgive student loan debt, pointing out with brutal precision the times that they, too, had government loans forgiven.
Biden's team is going on the offensive and it's delicious.
Joe Biden Goes 'Dark Brandon,’ Comes Out Fighting
The president has been on a run of major policy achievements and seems to be enjoying it.
On Thursday night, the spiciest thing on the internet (at least in political circles) was Joe Biden. You read that right. Joe. Biden.
With its Twitter account, the White House went after the Republican lawmakers criticizing the president’s decision to forgive student loan debt, pointing out with brutal precision the times that they, too, had government loans forgiven.
ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
"
CONCLUSION
Thus, because the Court is unable to provide the remedy plaintiff seeks by ordering that defendant “assume custody and control” over the audiotapes, the Court is unable to redress plaintiff's claim. Accordingly, the Court will grant defendant's motion to dismiss [Dkt. # 6] under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of standing. A separate order will issue."
Oh it fits just fine, I've already had it in there several times myself.
Again, DOJ was Defendant.
ActionianJacksonian
Well-Known Member
GA just cleaned up voter roles and removed 10k Biden voters lol I'm not even joking. Michigan removed 30k. Stacy Abrams literally asked outb of state voters to vote in GA. I'm thinking asking GA to not count 30+k votes that live out of state isn't a crime but pretending is a good way to financially hurt someone you don't like.
Even though I literally despise Lindsay Graham and all.
